MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 263

Thread: What to Expect From AMD at ISSCC 2011

Threaded View

  1. #10
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    TX, USA
    Posts
    898
    Quote Originally Posted by JkS View Post
    Agreed, it's the best of both worlds when it comes to multithreading and IPC.

    If you're a guy who doesn't need more than 4 cores, the cores get the FPU and cache to themselves and thus more single threaded performance.*

    If you're a guy who likes threaded applications, you get to leverage the threaded power of the architecture for more threaded performance.

    *I'm curious to know if the Bulldozer design tries to prioritize single threaded apps to their own modules, does anyone know if this is the case?
    I would expect that responsibility ultimately ends up at the OS thread scheduler's mercy (or use of direct thread binding). It should still pose a similar situation as Hyper-Threading/SMT, the scheduler could use whatever logical processors it wants, however it *might* not necessarily know how to optimize for the underlying micro-architectural implications, e.g. the logical to physical mapping and their resource-sharing relation.

    The more I hear about Bulldozer, the more I see it as an adaptation of the ideas inherent in the UltraSPARC T2/3 architecture, with AMD mainly emphasizing single-thread latency instead of going all out on throughput
    Last edited by rcofell; 02-24-2011 at 07:44 AM.



Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •