significant? in this chart we're looking at crap fps from every card. in the end, it doesn't matter if you have 15 or 19fps. it's unplayable either way.Originally Posted by Jodiuh
That looks pretty significant to me. [...]
however, i agree that the radeon's min fps look pretty bad in many reviews (however, not in all - i guess it's very dependant on the benchmarked scene...), but that's also one of the reasons i'm happy to bought a gtx570 over the 6950/70.
1. Asus P5Q-E / Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 @~3612 MHz (8,5x425) / 2x2GB OCZ Platinum XTC (PC2-8000U, CL5) / EVGA GeForce GTX 570 / Crucial M4 128GB, WD Caviar Blue 640GB, WD Caviar SE16 320GB, WD Caviar SE 160GB / be quiet! Dark Power Pro P7 550W / Thermaltake Tsunami VA3000BWA / LG L227WT / Teufel Concept E Magnum 5.1 // SysProfile
2. Asus A8N-SLI / AMD Athlon 64 4000+ @~2640 MHz (12x220) / 1024 MB Corsair CMX TwinX 3200C2, 2.5-3-3-6 1T / Club3D GeForce 7800GT @463/1120 MHz / Crucial M4 64GB, Hitachi Deskstar 40GB / be quiet! Blackline P5 470W
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks