Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 76 to 92 of 92

Thread: MSI AM3+ 990FX Spotted

  1. #76
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    2,084
    Quote Originally Posted by Sn0wm@n View Post
    and did they show am3+ compatibility or a new socket need for komodo??? not yet ... so its still in the air as far as we know ....


    so again my first post about the not complaining about the am3+ sockets dead end ...
    Komodo needs a new socket BECAUSE it got an integrated GPU, according to two different revisions of AMD slides.
    Which part of that don't you understand?
    Quote Originally Posted by Sn0wm@n View Post
    btw compairing server roadmap with client roadmap doesnt mean anything ... server roadmap is one thing .. and client roadmap is another ..
    Well obviously, otherwise there would be only one..
    However, they're usually not far away from each other in some terms.
    What you're suggesting is that Komodo shouldn't have integrated PCIe, which honestly doesn't make sense at all.
    Why would AMD do that?

    Can you tell me one reason why AMD shouldn't integrate PCIe in Komodo CPU's when the roadmap shows that the server CPU's will get it in 2012, and Intel have by that time been using it in desktop CPU's for 3 years?

    I never said I had had any facts, but according to AMD:

    C32/G34 was launched ~Q2 2010, and will work with first gen BD, but not second gen 32 nm BD. One obvious reason is integrated PCIe, see #2 and #3 in the post you replied to.

    Disclaimer: Komodo is not an APU.

  2. #77
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    1,886
    Quote Originally Posted by Mats View Post
    Komodo needs a new socket BECAUSE it got an integrated GPU, according to two different revisions of AMD slides.
    Which part of that don't you understand?

    Well obviously, otherwise there would be only one..
    However, they're usually not far away from each other in some terms.
    What you're suggesting is that Komodo shouldn't have integrated PCIe, which honestly doesn't make sense at all.
    Why would AMD do that?

    Can you tell me one reason why AMD shouldn't integrate PCIe in Komodo CPU's when the roadmap shows that the server CPU's will get it in 2012, and Intel have by that time been using it in desktop CPU's for 3 years?

    I never said I had had any facts, but according to AMD:

    C32/G34 was launched ~Q2 2010, and will work with first gen BD, but not second gen 32 nm BD. One obvious reason is integrated PCIe, see #2 and #3 in the post you replied to.

    Disclaimer: Komodo is not an APU.

    wich part of it says new socket on a roadmap ?????


    wich part of it says am3+ ... none .. so anything is still up for speculation ... but its not set in stones thats all that i said ...
    Last edited by Sn0wm@n; 01-19-2011 at 02:58 PM.
    WILL CUDDLE FOR FOOD

    Quote Originally Posted by JF-AMD View Post
    Dual proc client systems are like sex in high school. Everyone talks about it but nobody is really doing it.

  3. #78
    Brilliant Idiot
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Hell on Earth
    Posts
    11,015
    I'm glad MSI listened and staggered the dimm slots.
    heatware chew*
    I've got no strings to hold me down.
    To make me fret, or make me frown.
    I had strings but now I'm free.
    There are no strings on me

  4. #79
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Nor*cal
    Posts
    351
    Quote Originally Posted by Mats View Post
    Komodo needs a new socket BECAUSE it got an integrated GPU, according to two different revisions of AMD slides.
    Which part of that don't you understand?
    Well, as for the GPU, for all we know, AM3+ could be simply implementing a passthrough or a frame buffer copy device to the NB's IGP, in that way, mantaining existing compatibility, while also allowing APUs to work

    As for PCIe controllers on die, maybe, we'll have to see what AMD decides to do. We don't even know if Intel will keep Socket 2011 with on-die or seperate PCIe controllers

  5. #80
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hungary (EU)
    Posts
    1,376
    Quote Originally Posted by chew* View Post
    I'm glad MSI listened and staggered the dimm slots.
    That's right.
    -

  6. #81
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    2,084
    Quote Originally Posted by Sn0wm@n View Post
    wich part of it says new socket on a roadmap ?????
    Nowhere, no official doc, AFAIK. As I said on page 2, nothing is set in stone.

    It's all about making conclusions out of the few things we know, but you fail to show me any indications that Komodo will work with AM3+, and that's just because there aren't any.

    You really don't get it, do you? You don't want to understand, but that's just because of wishful thinking.

    I still hope I'm wrong, because I don't wanna swap board again. You just refuse to change your mind. How beautiful.

  7. #82
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    Quote Originally Posted by chew* View Post
    I'm glad MSI listened and staggered the dimm slots.
    ??? What do u mean? Slots as dualchannel A1+B1 or...?
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  8. #83
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside an AS355F2
    Posts
    414
    Quote Originally Posted by NEOAethyr View Post
    Hmm...
    Why are all the brand's of mobo makers using those lame round power buttons ?

    Does anyone know for sure if am3+ has quad chan support?
    If it doesn't then the only thing I'm really interested in is the avx support on the cpu it's self (that would come in real handy).
    .
    It sounds to me like you are running out of memory capacity not bandwidth.

    2Gb barely runs windows these days.

  9. #84
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Aussie FX View Post
    It sounds to me like you are running out of memory capacity not bandwidth.

    2Gb barely runs windows these days.
    Well, I went from 4Gb to 8Gb and also added a 32GB SSD drive to my computer and with DVD Maker and Windows media player removed and now my computer flies along (after I reinstalled Win7 of course).

  10. #85
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    i was just thinking about the new AM3+ platform and NB speeds

    are they expecting to increase the default now that a newer platform is coming out?

    all NB speeds have been 2ghz, but we know that 2.4ghz is reachable with any chip. so maybe BD could be based around like 2.6/2.8ghz and every 9xx platform is being built for such speeds, since they dont have to worry about people putting a BD into an old weak 8xx/7xx board.
    2500k @ 4900mhz - Asus Maxiums IV Gene Z - Swiftech Apogee LP
    GTX 680 @ +170 (1267mhz) / +300 (3305mhz) - EK 680 FC EN/Acteal
    Swiftech MCR320 Drive @ 1300rpms - 3x GT 1850s @ 1150rpms
    XS Build Log for: My Latest Custom Case

  11. #86
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    US, MI
    Posts
    1,680
    Quote Originally Posted by Aussie FX View Post
    It sounds to me like you are running out of memory capacity not bandwidth.

    2Gb barely runs windows these days.
    You try running blackman resize 1080p 4 tap along with a bunch of filters, frame rate conversion, audio rate upsampling and supereq...
    Even without messing with the video in any way it's still to slow to pull off supereq.

    I can set blackman resize to upscale to that res on my 1090t, use 100% of my availible mem and it's fine.
    If I use certain filtes it's slow though, even if I don't upscale.
    Supereq doesn't even use all of my mem, and the fps is something like 1-5fps if that, only 50% of my dual core at 2.9ghz being used for supereq...(edit: oh duh it's probably stuck using all of one core..., I wasn't thinking of that, maybe that needs an extremely fast cpu more then 4.5ghz...)

    It needs more balls in some way or another...
    Thinking quad chan might help.
    That's all .
    Last edited by NEOAethyr; 01-24-2011 at 01:57 PM.

  12. #87
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    1,886
    Quote Originally Posted by Mats View Post
    Nowhere, no official doc, AFAIK. As I said on page 2, nothing is set in stone.

    It's all about making conclusions out of the few things we know, but you fail to show me any indications that Komodo will work with AM3+, and that's just because there aren't any.

    You really don't get it, do you? You don't want to understand, but that's just because of wishful thinking.

    I still hope I'm wrong, because I don't wanna swap board again. You just refuse to change your mind. How beautiful.

    why would i need to show proof that komodo will work for am3+ if you agree that nothing is set in stones ...
    WILL CUDDLE FOR FOOD

    Quote Originally Posted by JF-AMD View Post
    Dual proc client systems are like sex in high school. Everyone talks about it but nobody is really doing it.

  13. #88
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Sydney Australia
    Posts
    5
    I'm really liking the look of that board.

    CPU: Intel I5 2500k@4.5ghz
    MB: Gigabyte Z68X-UD3-H B3
    GPU: 8gb G.Skill Rip Jaw X DDR3-2133mhz
    RAM: 1.2gb Inno3d GTX 570@900/1800/200mhz
    PSU: Corsair HX-750
    CASE: CoolerMaster CM690 II Advanced Window
    MONITOR: 24inch Viewsonic VX2433WM
    HDD: 1tb Samsung Spinpoint F3

  14. #89
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    2,084
    Quote Originally Posted by Sn0wm@n View Post
    why would i need to show proof that komodo will work for am3+ if you agree that nothing is set in stones ...
    You don't need to do anything, including replying to me, but you did.
    It's not my problem that it takes two weeks for you to read my post.

    You asked me what I based my conclusions on, and I answered.

    I asked you to do the same. You didn't. My bet is that you can't!
    Last edited by Mats; 01-25-2011 at 06:35 AM.

  15. #90
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    1,886
    Quote Originally Posted by Mats View Post
    You don't need to do anything, including replying to me, but you did.
    It's not my problem that it takes two weeks for you to read my post.

    You asked me what I based my conclusions on, and I answered.

    I asked you to do the same. You didn't. My bet is that you can't!


    LOLL what sort of reply is this???


    out of answers allready


    and btw i allready answered that post
    WILL CUDDLE FOR FOOD

    Quote Originally Posted by JF-AMD View Post
    Dual proc client systems are like sex in high school. Everyone talks about it but nobody is really doing it.

  16. #91
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    still waiting at enxt mobos...example Crosshair V Extreme .
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  17. #92
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    249
    PCSX2 already runs great on my 1090T aside from the usual bugs/compatibility issues with some games. I don't think any Bulldozer chips will be a bottleneck for that emulator. The only people I see complaining about performance with Deneb/Thuban in the forums are those running at stock or a light overclock.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •