I see what you mean. This move (and the following price-reduction) could work for mid-range or low-range cards, but we are taking about high-end cards here. In this segment, many would pay $100 more for 5% more performance, or so.
The high-end is all about the performance crown!. The next-best is usually uninteresting and therefore is much cheaper. Just like, 6970 is not that much better than 6950, but the price is much higher. The same is true for 580 vs 570 too.
I personally mean they should try to gain performance, not the opposite, because these are AMDs top-cards, not mid-range.
► ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
► 2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
► Silver Arrow , push/pull
► 2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
► GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
► Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
► CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
+
► EVGA SR-2 , A50
► 2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
► Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
► 3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
► XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
► Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
► SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W
Bookmarks