Results 1 to 25 of 126

Thread: AMD HD6950/HD6970 1GB in a few weeks (the people's high end gpu)

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme 3D Team
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    8,499
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam_oslo View Post
    These guys are going the wrong way.
    If they want to make a good change, then they have to increase RAM (or something else, I dunno what) to match/beat nVidis 570 and 580. A 50-60$ price-cut wouldn't cut it.
    Chances are, this sill hurt performance about 5% or less, I wouldn't mind two of these 1GB 6950's at all.
    Smile

  2. #2
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Oslo - Norway
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by BeepBeep2 View Post
    Chances are, this sill hurt performance about 5% or less, I wouldn't mind two of these 1GB 6950's at all.
    I see what you mean. This move (and the following price-reduction) could work for mid-range or low-range cards, but we are taking about high-end cards here. In this segment, many would pay $100 more for 5% more performance, or so.

    The high-end is all about the performance crown!. The next-best is usually uninteresting and therefore is much cheaper. Just like, 6970 is not that much better than 6950, but the price is much higher. The same is true for 580 vs 570 too.

    I personally mean they should try to gain performance, not the opposite, because these are AMDs top-cards, not mid-range.

    ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
    2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
    Silver Arrow , push/pull
    2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
    GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
    CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
    +
    EVGA SR-2 , A50
    2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
    Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
    3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
    XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
    SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W

  3. #3
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    2,095
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam_oslo View Post
    I see what you mean. This move (and the following price-reduction) could work for mid-range or low-range cards, but we are taking about high-end cards here. In this segment, many would pay $100 more for 5% more performance, or so.

    The high-end is all about the performance crown!. The next-best is usually uninteresting and therefore is much cheaper. Just like, 6970 is not that much better than 6950, but the price is much higher. The same is true for 580 vs 570 too.

    I personally mean they should try to gain performance, not the opposite, because these are AMDs top-cards, not mid-range.
    No, they wouldn't. If I could get a 6950 for ~250, I would not pay another $50 to get 5% more performance, that being contingent on me using high res.
    E7200 @ 3.4 ; 7870 GHz 2 GB
    Intel's atom is a terrible chip.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •