Results 1 to 25 of 256

Thread: Bulldoze that Sandy Bridge

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,209
    I think no. Quad FX was a try to get back the "FX" Performance crown just using 2 processors because one didnt do it. It was a flop. I dont think they will try that again.

    In Socket 939 and earlier times, FX was just the highest clocked Athlon, which indeed was the fastest gaming processor on the market those times. I hope they will revive that spirit again (which is very likely, even if its going to be slightly less fast then some intel when it comes out..)
    1. ASUS Sabertooth 990fx | FX 8320 || 2. DFI DK 790FXB-M3H5 | X4 810
    8GB Samsung 30nm DDR3-2000 9-10-10-28 || 4GB PSC DDR3-1333 6-7-6-21
    Corsair TX750W | Sapphire 6970 2GB || BeQuiet PurePower 450w | HD 4850
    EK Supreme | AC aquagratix | Laing Pro | MoRa 2 || Aircooled

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    317
    Quote Originally Posted by Oese View Post
    In Socket 939 and earlier times, FX was just the highest clocked Athlon, which indeed was the fastest gaming processor on the market those times. I hope they will revive that spirit again (which is very likely, even if its going to be slightly less fast then some intel when it comes out..)
    For some AMD trivia, before socket 939 the FX wasn't in a mainstream plattform. IIRC the FX-51 debuted as a socket 940 part along the 754 introduction, requiring buffered RAM like an opteron. For a short time it was 200MHz faster than the 754 flagship.
    Strix X470-F, 1.2.0.6b | 5800X3D + Galahad 360, 3xP28 | 4x8GB Flare X 3200C14 @3200C14 1T+GDM | Strix 2070S A8G @1830/1750 | SB Z | SN750 500GB, MX500 1TB, DT01 2TB | O11D XL: 6xNB PL-2 | RM750

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •