Pi-fast Benchmark V.4.3

[hipro5]

Hi all you guys....

We (here in Hellas) have "fixed" the Pi-fast V.4.3 (newer one) so as to be easy benchable

Just "click" on "thelab_pifast.bat" file ......

There you go ...Give it a try......

[eva2000]

downloaded

[hipro5]

Originally posted by eva2000
downloaded

Hi there eva2000......What's up my friend.....

[eva2000]

I'm still playing with a pile of nice ram... while waiting on RMA for my X800Pro heh

[hipro5]

OK ..Here's on of mine......

[The Stilt]

Pifast really hates prescotts



Got once 33.94 (4660MHz), but it crashed when I opened paint

[nfin1te]

nice, but could u make it modifiable?
(like change values in a .bat file)

[chrisbmw150]

[chrisbmw150]

The Stilt... xmm... your score is really weird

[zyx]

[Mini]

Isnt this1 faster than the other 1??? If so then thats kinda bad as its a smaller differance...

But on my school comp i got 209.79 P3 933Mhz - 128 MB ram ;o)

[LarsK]

Here's my result, P4 EE @ 4 Ghz

[hipro5]

Originally posted by nfin1te
nice, but could u make it modifiable?
(like change values in a .bat file)

But if it's modifiable , then we couldn't have a standard one to compare!!!..........

[eva2000]

what a difference in times from hexus pifast vs thelab pifast

2.8C @ 200fsb
AI7
2x 256MB KHX3200K2/512 @ 200mhz 2-2--26
NB Strap 800fsb
GAT = F1-A-A-D-D

hexus pifast = ~68s
thelab pifast = 46.16s!

[hipro5]

Originally posted by chrisbmw150
The Stilt... xmm... your score is really weird

It's because those Prescotts REALY don't like Pi-fast bench............I've seen it too.....Don't know why though.......


BTW Nine overclock you've got there The Stilt with the Prescott....

[hipro5]

Originally posted by LarsK
Here's my result, P4 EE @ 4 Ghz

Those EE's are fast M8.........Dumn fast.......Mine's an EE too.......

[hipro5]

Originally posted by eva2000
what a difference in times from hexus pifast vs thelab pifast

2.8C @ 200fsb
AI7
2x 256MB KHX3200K2/512 @ 200mhz 2-2--26
NB Strap 800fsb
GAT = F1-A-A-D-D

hexus pifast = ~68s
thelab pifast = 46.16s!

Hexus pi-fast is based on pi-fast V.4.1 (old one) and thelab's is based on the newer one(2003) pi-fast V.4.3 with some bugs fixed and I think that it can handle or recognise the newer instructions of nowdays CPU's like SSE2 for example......

[eva2000]

awesome anything that makes better use of our cpus is

2.8C SL6Z5
Abit AI7 17 bios
2x 256MB KHX3200K2/512 BH-5

old hexus pifast using v4.1 pifast = 51.39s


newer thelab pifast using v4.3 pifast = 35.02s

[LarsK]

Originally posted by hipro5
Those EE's are fast M8.........Dumn fast.......Mine's an EE too.......

Yup, they sure are. Especially when compared to Northwoods and Prescotts clock for clock. I'm about to sell mine though, hoping to pick up a 3.4EE with better oc potential than this particular chip. I see from your results that the new stepping should be really good. I was lucky enough to pick up one of the last Mach II GT's (if not THE last one here in Denmark), so cooling it shouldn't be a huge problem

I did run the test @ 4115 Mhz (257 Mhz fsb), mem @ 5:4 but it was slower (32.45 vs. 32.23 @ 4 Ghz, mem @ 250 Mhz).

[shidokanjohn]

Hello Hipro

[hipro5]

Originally posted by LarsK
Yup, they sure are. Especially when compared to Northwoods and Prescotts clock for clock. I'm about to sell mine though, hoping to pick up a 3.4EE with better oc potential than this particular chip. I see from your results that the new stepping should be really good. I was lucky enough to pick up one of the last Mach II GT's (if not THE last one here in Denmark), so cooling it shouldn't be a huge problem

I did run the test @ 4115 Mhz (257 Mhz fsb), mem @ 5:4 but it was slower (32.45 vs. 32.23 @ 4 Ghz, mem @ 250 Mhz).

All of the EE aren't good overclockers.........I think it's because a. they have over 3 times the tranzistors than a normal one and b. that the L3 must work at 1:1 with the core even with higher latency than the L2...............