MMM
Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: AMD rolls out Radeon HD 6000M GPUs

  1. #1
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060

    AMD rolls out Radeon HD 6000M GPUs

    Source: http://www.fudzilla.com/
    AMD followed up the official release of Fusion platform by announcing its newest HD 6000M series mobile GPUs. The entire Radeon HD 6000M series has DirectX 11 support, HD3D for stereo 3D and AMD's EyeSpeed technology.

    Although it has been noted that the Radeon HD 6000M series will feature the HD 6900M/6800M for enthusiast market, HD 6700M, 6600M and 6500M for the performance, Radeon HD 6400M for mainstream and Radeon HD 6300M for "thin and light", for now, AMD has only released full specs for the HD 6300M and the 6500M GPUs.

    The HD 6500M features 400 stream processors and 20 texture units, core clock set between 500 and 650MHz, 400 to 520 GigaFLOPS of processing power and either DDR3 or GDDR5 memory working at 1.8GHz and 3.6GHz.

    The slower Radeon HD 6300M features 80 stream processors and 8 texture units, GPU clocked between 500 and 750MHz offering between 80 to 120 GigaFLOPS of processing power, and DDR3 memory with clocks depending on the choice of memory (1.6 or 1.8GHz).

    The AMD Radeon 6000M series GPUs have been seen running in a couple of notebooks already and we are sure that we'll see more, and the rest of the lineup pretty soon.
    Hm, no 6900M specs...
    But others look good. Just need some reviews of the notebooks now, to see them in action.
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    302
    http://www.amd.com/us/products/noteb...n-6900m.aspx#2
    6900m

    * 960 Stream Processing Units
    * 48 Texture Units
    * 128 Z/Stencil ROP Units
    * 32 Color ROP Units

    core: 580-680 MHz
    mem: 900 MHz

    Edit:
    http://forum.notebookreview.com/hard...ity-6000m.html
    Last edited by Sgt.McRuff; 01-04-2011 at 07:55 AM.
    Motherboard: GigaByte P67UD4 f6 | CPU: Intel 2500k 4.5ghz 1.26v | Memory: GSkill 2x4gb @ 1600mhz 1.34v | PSU: SeaSonic X650 Gold 650W | Video: AMD 6970 Koolance water block 880c/1450mem 1.035v | HDD: WD 640gb cavier black: VelociRaptor 300gb: Intel x-25 g2 80gb | Sound: Asus xonar D1 | OS: W7 64bit

  3. #3
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Ace Deuce, Michigan
    Posts
    3,955
    Quote Originally Posted by Sgt.McRuff View Post
    http://www.amd.com/us/products/noteb...n-6900m.aspx#2
    6900m

    * 960 Stream Processing Units
    * 48 Texture Units
    * 128 Z/Stencil ROP Units
    * 32 Color ROP Units

    core: 580-680 MHz
    mem: 900 MHz
    Nice, more powerful than 5870M and should be considerably more power efficient
    Quote Originally Posted by Hans de Vries View Post

    JF-AMD posting: IPC increases!!!!!!! How many times did I tell you!!!

    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    .....}
    until (interrupt by Movieman)


    Regards, Hans

  4. #4
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    1,972
    Look similar of the 6850.
    CPU: - I7 4930K (EK Supremacy )
    GPU: - 2x AMD HD7970 flashed GHZ bios ( EK Acetal Nickel Waterblock H2o)
    Motherboard: Asus x79 Deluxe
    RAM: G-skill Ares C9 2133mhz 16GB
    Main Storage: Samsung 840EVO 500GB / 2x Crucial RealSSD C300 Raid0

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    145
    So it goes something like this?

    6900M: Barts
    6800M: Juniper
    6700M/6600M: Turks?
    6500M: Redwood
    6400M: Caicos?
    6300M: Cedar

    If that's the case we have the SP counts of Turks (480) and Caicos (160)…
    Last edited by iMacmatician; 01-04-2011 at 08:50 AM.

  6. #6
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Flying through Space, with armoire, Armoire of INVINCIBILATAAAAY!
    Posts
    1,939
    Quote Originally Posted by Lanek View Post
    Look similar of the 6850.
    no surprise there.

    5870M looks suspiciously similar to 5770
    Sigs are obnoxious.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    253
    Quote Originally Posted by iddqd View Post
    no surprise there.

    5870M looks suspiciously similar to 5770
    5870M has lower default clock speed

    So, it is even weaker than HD5770 even though both have 800sp

    And 6900m also has lower clock speed than HD6850
    Last edited by dartaz; 01-04-2011 at 09:32 AM.

  8. #8
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,012
    the real question is what is the bus width? if it's 256bit then this will make a great chip if it's not.....then nothing really to see here. my bet is on 256bit tho...
    CPU: Intel Core i7 3930K @ 4.5GHz
    Mobo: Asus Rampage IV Extreme
    RAM: 32GB (8x4GB) Patriot Viper EX @ 1866mhz
    GPU: EVGA GTX Titan (1087Boost/6700Mem)
    Physx: Evga GTX 560 2GB
    Sound: Creative XFI Titanium
    Case: Modded 700D
    PSU: Corsair 1200AX (Fully Sleeved)
    Storage: 2x120GB OCZ Vertex 3's in RAID 0 + WD 600GB V-Raptor + Seagate 1TB
    Cooling: XSPC Raystorm, 2x MCP 655's, FrozenQ Warp Drive, EX360+MCR240+EX120 Rad's

  9. #9
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    450
    Quote Originally Posted by [XC] hipno650 View Post
    the real question is what is the bus width? if it's 256bit then this will make a great chip if it's not.....then nothing really to see here. my bet is on 256bit tho...
    With 960SPs it should be 256bit since it should be a Barts GPU. Doesn't make much sense in making another die just for mobile.

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    90
    Hm.. 6800M = Juniper.

  11. #11
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,012
    Quote Originally Posted by marten_larsson View Post
    With 960SPs it should be 256bit since it should be a Barts GPU. Doesn't make much sense in making another die just for mobile.
    well they can't just plaster a barts GPU into it and call it a day.... the chip is mobile designed it's just very similar to barts. but like I said i expect it to be 256bit but we don't know for sure...
    CPU: Intel Core i7 3930K @ 4.5GHz
    Mobo: Asus Rampage IV Extreme
    RAM: 32GB (8x4GB) Patriot Viper EX @ 1866mhz
    GPU: EVGA GTX Titan (1087Boost/6700Mem)
    Physx: Evga GTX 560 2GB
    Sound: Creative XFI Titanium
    Case: Modded 700D
    PSU: Corsair 1200AX (Fully Sleeved)
    Storage: 2x120GB OCZ Vertex 3's in RAID 0 + WD 600GB V-Raptor + Seagate 1TB
    Cooling: XSPC Raystorm, 2x MCP 655's, FrozenQ Warp Drive, EX360+MCR240+EX120 Rad's

  12. #12
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Nor*cal
    Posts
    351
    Quote Originally Posted by [XC] hipno650 View Post
    well they can't just plaster a barts GPU into it and call it a day.... the chip is mobile designed it's just very similar to barts. but like I said i expect it to be 256bit but we don't know for sure...
    Actually, that is what they do, afaik. They bin, powergate, undervolt, anything under the sun, to get a mobile GPU that is acceptably fast with a low power consumption. That's why a HD5870m will go for about 350usd (w/o OEM HSF), while most will never even touch a HD5770 that expensive. But both are the same die.

  13. #13
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    145
    Quote Originally Posted by [XC] hipno650 View Post
    well they can't just plaster a barts GPU into it and call it a day.... the chip is mobile designed it's just very similar to barts. but like I said i expect it to be 256bit but we don't know for sure...
    According to the specs page it has 900 MHz memory and 115.2 GB/s bandwidth which means 256-bit bus.

  14. #14

  15. #15
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    660
    Strange, but 6850M has 256-bit, while its elder brother 6870m has only 128-bit memory interface. A typo? but where?
    An unfortunate person is one tries to fart but sh1ts instead...

    My Water Cooling Case Build (closed)

  16. #16
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Lima, Peru
    Posts
    600
    Based on Juniper so yes, it's a typo. 128bit for the 6800M.
    Athlon II X4 620 2.6Ghz @1.1125v | Foxconn A7DA-S (790GX) | 2x2GB OCZ Platinum DDR2 1066
    | Gigabyte HD4770 | Seagate 7200.12 3x1TB | Samsung F4 HD204UI 2x2TB | LG H10N | OCZ StealthXStream 500w| Coolermaster Hyper 212+ | Compaq MV740 17"

    Stock HSF: 18°C idle / 37°C load (15°C ambient)
    Hyper 212+: 16°C idle / 29°C load (15°C ambient)

    Why AMD Radeon rumors/leaks "are not always accurate"
    Reality check

  17. #17
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,125
    Barts in a mobile platform will be very awesome

  18. #18
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Flying through Space, with armoire, Armoire of INVINCIBILATAAAAY!
    Posts
    1,939
    ^
    should be about twice as fast a 5870M
    Sigs are obnoxious.

  19. #19
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Lima, Peru
    Posts
    600
    Now if the new low end gpu in desktops is the HD6450 160SP, sb igp instantly becomes obsolete as a "perform as low end". It was pretty funny compare it with 1 year old low end(wich was also a rehash of a two year old chip 4350/4550).


    Reading the official specs:
    HD6700M/6600M based on dekstop Turks (half Barts Pro)
    HD6500M based on Redwood
    HD6400M based on Caicos

    http://www.amd.com/us/products/noteb...n-6400m.aspx#2
    http://www.amd.com/us/products/noteb...n-6500m.aspx#2
    http://www.amd.com/us/products/noteb...m-6600m.aspx#2

    If I'm correct the next desktop chips should look like this.

    HD6700 Turks XT
    560SP
    28Texture Units
    16Rops
    GDDR5
    128bit

    HD6600 Turks Pro
    480SP
    24Texture Units
    8Rops
    GDDR5
    128bit

    HD6500 Redwood
    400SP
    20Texture Units
    8Rops
    DDR3/GDDR5
    128bit

    HD6400 Caicos
    160SP
    8Texture Units
    4Rops
    DDR3/GDDR5
    64bit
    Athlon II X4 620 2.6Ghz @1.1125v | Foxconn A7DA-S (790GX) | 2x2GB OCZ Platinum DDR2 1066
    | Gigabyte HD4770 | Seagate 7200.12 3x1TB | Samsung F4 HD204UI 2x2TB | LG H10N | OCZ StealthXStream 500w| Coolermaster Hyper 212+ | Compaq MV740 17"

    Stock HSF: 18°C idle / 37°C load (15°C ambient)
    Hyper 212+: 16°C idle / 29°C load (15°C ambient)

    Why AMD Radeon rumors/leaks "are not always accurate"
    Reality check

  20. #20
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by iddqd View Post
    no surprise there.

    5870M looks suspiciously similar to 5770
    yeah, same i was thinking...

    not that its bad for a laptop, but for a DTR thats definitely not enough... then AGAIN they dont make proper DTRs anymore these days with 15" being the biggest

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •