Page 13 of 22 FirstFirst ... 310111213141516 ... LastLast
Results 301 to 325 of 537

Thread: Sandy Bridge i7 & i5 Reviews

  1. #301
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Windsor, Canada
    Posts
    858
    Nice to see we finally have reviews. Reading Anand's review right now... Arg the decision to wait for Bulldozer and see how things play out or just jump on the Sandy Bridge bandwagon right now is going to be a hard one!
    Quote Originally Posted by jimmyz View Post
    A DFI board is like a divorce, expensive, but well worth it.
    Quote Originally Posted by virtualrain View Post
    I dunno... I think a DFI board is more like marriage... demanding, time consuming, and a PITA but rewarding in it's own twisted way.

  2. #302
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Madison, WI
    Posts
    638
    The power consumption under load compared to a i7 920 is just crazy. Some of the reviews show close to 100W difference even with 1.4+ voltage on the 2600K.

    I'm definitely picking up a 2600K for folding but now to find the best mobo.

  3. #303
    HWiNFO Author
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    /dev/null
    Posts
    801
    HWiNFO32 offers a more advanced support of Sandy Bridge (since several months).
    It can report several additional params and monitoring that no other tool is currently capable (like power limits, consumption, GT GPU clock, etc.).

  4. #304
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,116
    wtf how is sandy bridge losing in real world tests, those amd systems were way slower in the synthetic tests. gotta read more reviews and see if the real world improvement is there.

  5. #305
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    SF
    Posts
    1,070
    Quote Originally Posted by bamtan2 View Post
    wtf how is sandy bridge losing in real world tests, those amd systems were way slower in the synthetic tests. gotta read more reviews and see if the real world improvement is there.
    can you post up an example?

  6. #306
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the Land down -under-
    Posts
    4,452
    Quote Originally Posted by bamtan2 View Post
    wtf how is sandy bridge losing in real world tests, those amd systems were way slower in the synthetic tests. gotta read more reviews and see if the real world improvement is there.




    Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?

  7. #307

  8. #308
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    18
    According to the chart on Anandtech the K series don't support VT-d or TXT(Whatever that is :P).

    Anyone got an explanation why?

  9. #309
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Bucharest, RO
    Posts
    33

    Another review


  10. #310
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    380
    Quote Originally Posted by FISKER_Q View Post
    According to the chart on Anandtech the K series don't support VT-d or TXT(Whatever that is :P).

    Anyone got an explanation why?
    VT-d has got to do with virtualization. mistake in the charts ?

    Core i5-2500K Specifications

    Base Clock Speed: 3.3GHz
    # of Cores: 4
    # of Threads: 4
    Max Turbo Frequency: 3.7GHz
    L1 Cache: 32KB Instruction and 32KB Data for each core
    L2 Cache: 256KB Shared Instruction/Data for each core
    L3 Cache: 6MB Shared Instruction/Data among all cores
    Instruction Set: 64-bit
    Instruction Set Extensions: SSE4.2
    Lithography: 32nm
    Max TDP: 95W
    1ku Bulk Budgetary Price: $216
    Memory Types: DDR3-1066/1333
    Intel HD Graphics: Yes
    Intel HD Graphics 2000/3000: 3000
    Graphics Base Frequency: 850MHz
    Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency: 1100MHz
    Intel Flexible Display Interface: Yes
    Intel Clear Video HD Technology: Yes
    Dual Display Capable: Yes
    Socket Supported: LGA1155
    Intel Hyper-Threading Technology: No
    Intel Virtualization Technology: Yes
    Intel Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX): Yes
    Intel vPro / TXT / VT-d / Intel SIPP: Yes
    Intel Quick Sync Video: Yes
    AES New Instructions: Yes
    http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.ph...1&limitstart=1
    Last edited by geo; 01-03-2011 at 03:30 AM.

  11. #311
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    @Rockwell Business Center
    Posts
    129
    wow 2600k is even beating 980x!
    would there still be a socket 2011 or is this the highend SB??
    will wait for that one and for the bulldozer/FX whatever amd comes up with before jumping..
    Newbie Cruncher

  12. #312
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    ROMANIA
    Posts
    687
    i5 2500K@ 4.5Ghz
    Asrock P67 PRO3


    P55 PRO & i5 750
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=966385
    239 BCKL validation on cold air
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=966536
    Almost 5hgz , air.

  13. #313
    HWiNFO Author
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    /dev/null
    Posts
    801
    K-series do not support neither TXT nor VT-d

  14. #314
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    380
    Quote Originally Posted by Mumak View Post
    K-series do not support neither TXT nor VT-d
    damn, that sucks. bad for people who were looking to build some cheap workstations

  15. #315
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    prospekt Veteranov, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
    Posts
    494
    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...k,2833-18.html - pay attention to the minimum fps

  16. #316
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Denmark / Aarhus
    Posts
    1,036
    Any reviews of a duel core laptop? Pretty sure they are not stuffing a quad core into the X201 Tablet replacement with these batterytimes I would not mind though
    Desktop I5-3570k, 8GB Ram, GTX 560, Silverstone TJ08-E, Crucial M4 128GB, 750W Silver Power, ASUS P8Z77-M
    Laptop ThinkPad W520 2720QM /2 x 4 GB ram / Quadro 1000M / Crucial M4 128GB + 500Gb Hdd / FHD Screen / Intel WiFi Link 6300 AGN WLAN / 9 Cell Battery
    Laptop 2 New Macbook Pro Retina / i7 QuadCore / 650 GT / 16GB Ram / 512 GB SSD
    Server: Athlon II X4 640, ASROCK K10N78, 8GB Ram, LSI MegaRaid 8 port, 64GB Vertex 1, 5 x 1 TB WD Raid6, 3 x 3TB Seagate Raid5

  17. #317
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    399
    Quote Originally Posted by Chaserjzx100 View Post
    would there still be a socket 2011 or is this the highend SB??
    Anand mentions 4 and 6 cores on LGA2011 in Q4, without IGP. No 8 cores though.

  18. #318
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    prospekt Veteranov, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
    Posts
    494
    8 full cores do not fit thermal envelope at 32 nm
    8 bulldozer semi-cores do fit

  19. #319
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Thessaloniki, Greece
    Posts
    1,307
    Quote Originally Posted by geo View Post
    VT-d has got to do with virtualization. mistake in the charts ?



    http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.ph...1&limitstart=1
    VT-d also needs to be supported by the chipset and the bios of the mobo.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mumak View Post
    K-series do not support neither TXT nor VT-d
    If true that sucks
    Last edited by BrowncoatGR; 01-03-2011 at 04:13 AM.
    Seems we made our greatest error when we named it at the start
    for though we called it "Human Nature" - it was cancer of the heart
    CPU: AMD X3 720BE@ 3,4Ghz
    Cooler: Xigmatek S1283(Terrible mounting system for AM2/3)
    Motherboard: Gigabyte 790FXT-UD5P(F4) RAM: 2x 2GB OCZ DDR3 1600Mhz Gold 8-8-8-24
    GPU:HD5850 1GB
    PSU: Seasonic M12D 750W Case: Coolermaster HAF932(aka Dusty )

  20. #320
    HWiNFO Author
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    /dev/null
    Posts
    801
    Since the IMC and GFX is now integrated in the CPU, the VT-d support is now split between CPU (DMA, Memory, GFX) and PCH (HDA, SATA, USB, GbE, APIC, HPET..)

  21. #321
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Australia! :)
    Posts
    6,096
    just thinking.. if the 2500 is ~$215(?) & is better than i7-920.. what will happen to the price of 2nd hand i7 CPUs?
    DNA = Design Not Accident
    DNA = Darwin Not Accurate

    heatware / ebay
    HARDWARE I only own Xeons, Extreme Editions & Lian Li's
    https://prism-break.org/

  22. #322
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,366
    Anand reviewed SB notebook (i7-2820QM + HD3000):
    http://www.anandtech.com/show/4084/i...le-landscape/2
    Looks very impressive. Mostly faster then desktop i7-920, pretty capable graphics (level of hd5470 & 320M) and excellent battery life.

    Personally i'm locking forward to buy i7-2657M based notebook (i hope it would not be to expensive). That thing would destroy any brazos based notebook.

  23. #323
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    253
    The turbo mode for SB notebooks has been improved a lot. If you look at first page of anandtech review, you would see that 2820QM can go up to 3.4GHz when 1 core used, 3.3GHz when two cores are used and 3.1GHz when all the 4 cores are used.

    Also, all the mobile CPUs (except OEM & LV/ULV models) have GPU turbo up to 1300MHz

    http://www.anandtech.com/show/4084/i...le-landscape/1

    Not to mention that power consumption is much better than previous generation

    EDIT: LV/ULV models are going to have HD3000 (12EU) graphics. Though, the GPU clock is going to be lower than regular models
    Last edited by dartaz; 01-03-2011 at 05:40 AM.

  24. #324
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    SF
    Posts
    1,070
    yeah the high-end mobile SB chips are impressive, but you know darn well they are going to command a very high price. I'm more interested in seeing how the lower-end mobile SB will be priced.

  25. #325
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Quote Originally Posted by DarthShader View Post
    Anand mentions 4 and 6 cores on LGA2011 in Q4, without IGP. No 8 cores though.
    I was surprised by this too. Maybe Anand made a typo there? Of course,there is a possibility that intel is going for maximum of 6 cores with SB(power limited) and 8 cores with IB refresh.

Page 13 of 22 FirstFirst ... 310111213141516 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •