MMM
Page 15 of 34 FirstFirst ... 51213141516171825 ... LastLast
Results 351 to 375 of 848

Thread: GTX580: 1.025VID: 950/1900/2300: stock cooler: guaranteed?!?

  1. #351
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    4,046
    Shadow0001 use the 1.025vidder as main/gpu 0

    the 1.063vidder will dictate how far the whole tri-sli system will go.. 900mhz under best circumstances

    try 1.100-1.125vgpu/auto fan and see how hot they get @ default clocks then work your way up the clock ladder

    good luck!

  2. #352
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    115
    Quote Originally Posted by NapalmV5 View Post
    Shadow0001 use the 1.025vidder as main/gpu 0

    the 1.063vidder will dictate how far the whole tri-sli system will go.. 900mhz under best circumstances

    try 1.100-1.125vgpu/auto fan and see how hot they get @ default clocks then work your way up the clock ladder

    good luck!

    Thanks,i'll be plenty happy at 850 mhz for all 3 cards,but what about memory speeds?....

  3. #353
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    4,046
    2200 do try up to 2300 may have to set fan higher

  4. #354
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    115
    Quote Originally Posted by NapalmV5 View Post
    2200 do try up to 2300 may have to set fan higher

    Actually,i got 850Mhz right on the first try with all 3 cards at 1.1 volts,without any artifacting and running several loops of the heaven demo,but came across something i never though would happen..


    I use 3 screens,so i though that the overclock on the GPU's would make a performance difference,and this is with a 980x running at 4.5 Ghz(1.4 volts,air cooled),but look at these results:


    With the cards at stock clocks:




    With the cards running at 850/2100:





    So what i'm going to do next is push the CPU a little bit harder and see if the difference increases,compared to the minimal difference acheived by overclocking the cards,and if it does get larger,then a 980x at 4.5 Ghz,simply isn't enough to uncork all the performance out of the cards,even at stock clocks,and at least with regards to the heaven demo...

  5. #355
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    4,046
    ^ 260.99 vs 263.09 ^

    forget that.. for 3way and 4way sli you need the 265.90 quadro drivers+appropriate inf

    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=263009

  6. #356
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    115
    Quote Originally Posted by NapalmV5 View Post
    ^ 260.99 vs 263.09 ^

    forget that.. for 3way and 4way sli you need the 265.90 quadro drivers+appropriate inf

    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=263009

    I'll install them tomorrow and run the benchmark with the cards overclocked and see if there's any improvements then,if not,then squeeze the CPU a little harder and see then.


    Would be shocking hitting a wall at these crazy settings,CPU wise though.

  7. #357
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    4,046
    what power supply ?

    cpu is ok the benchmark is totally gpu dependent at this rez/settings

    you need those quadro drivers

    heres boulard83s 5760x1080 so you can compare

    Quote Originally Posted by Boulard83 View Post
    My 885mhz SLI GTX460 was barelly keeping 30fps AVG at this res. 2 GTX580s nearly stock and WAY better.




    These pics are with Xtrem Tess and 4x AA/AF.









  8. #358
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    4,046
    Shadow0001

    to replicate a heavy load i ran heaven @ max settings+tess scale/factor/distance @ 2.0

    default and 850/2100 clocks

    nothing new here if you want higher performance in heaven youve got to resort to watercooling




  9. #359
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    115
    Quote Originally Posted by NapalmV5 View Post
    Shadow0001

    to replicate a heavy load i ran heaven @ max settings+tess scale/factor/distance @ 2.0

    default and 850/2100 clocks

    nothing new here if you want higher performance in heaven youve got to resort to watercooling

    Boulard isn't running the same settings as me,as i'm running in extreme tesselation mode and 5760*1200 resolution,16X AF and 4X antialiasing...

  10. #360
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    4,046
    Shadow0001

    i know you two are the only ones here so far @ 5760 rez

    i just brought it up since you can compare vs 2way sli @ 5760x1080


    Quote Originally Posted by NapalmV5 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Kimofil View Post
    It seems like AA level don't matter for tri-sli.
    And yes, 64-bit FPS a lower for me too than 32 because of better LOD i think.
    Anyway, min FPS a LOT higher

    Did a retest with much never drivers and CPU/GPU on stock clock.
    while tri-sli worx @ ambush map doesnt quite work @ cargo flythrough

    tri-sli^ vs sli @ same clocks


  11. #361
    PI in the face
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    3,083
    I have a new 1.035 that does 975/1050 3d11 all day
    Quote Originally Posted by L0ud View Post
    So many opinions and so few screenshots

  12. #362
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    4,046
    Splave

    nice! sli results coming?

  13. #363
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    269
    Quote Originally Posted by NapalmV5 View Post
    shigs nice what vid?
    Hi Napalm,

    Thanks for the help, my Vid = 1.012 ... this good or bad? :P


    system spec coming soon...

  14. #364
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    4,046
    shigs

    oh its good better cooling+more voltage: 1ghz+ easy


    im looking at watercooling offerings.. last time i was into watercooling was ~7 years ago

    what do you guys think of this setup ?

    at least 5ghz 980x 1ghz 3x 580 - performance would be phenomenal

    but do you guys think its worth it ?

    what water pump/s would you guys recommend ?

    Last edited by NapalmV5; 12-16-2010 at 06:52 AM.

  15. #365
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    IND
    Posts
    1,038
    @ ts = COMPARE with 6950 CF plz.......same setting MUST



    3D MARK 2011 ( X )
    Last edited by Gaul; 12-16-2010 at 08:33 AM.

  16. #366
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Taipei, Taiwan
    Posts
    95
    Wow, I can't wait to get a 580 now. Awesome results all around!

  17. #367
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    269
    Quote Originally Posted by NapalmV5 View Post
    shigs

    oh its good better cooling+more voltage: 1ghz+ easy


    im looking at watercooling offerings.. last time i was into watercooling was ~7 years ago

    what do you guys think of this setup ?

    at least 5ghz 980x 1ghz 3x 580 - performance would be phenomenal

    but do you guys think its worth it ?

    what water pump/s would you guys recommend ?
    i've also been looking into watercooling, like you i've not watercooled for about 5 years now!

    however i'm thinking of going down the chiller route...

    thinking of getting one of these http://www.aquatuning.co.uk/product_...capacity-.html

    picking up a 990x when it comes out

    1GHZ GPU 24 / 7 stable sounds good to me


    system spec coming soon...

  18. #368
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    4,046
    Quote Originally Posted by nolonger View Post
    Wow, I can't wait to get a 580 now. Awesome results all around!
    thanx!

    Quote Originally Posted by shigs View Post
    i've also been looking into watercooling, like you i've not watercooled for about 5 years now!

    however i'm thinking of going down the chiller route...

    thinking of getting one of these http://www.aquatuning.co.uk/product_...capacity-.html

    picking up a 990x when it comes out

    1GHZ GPU 24 / 7 stable sounds good to me
    chiller? i dont wanna worry about condensation.. more power to yah though

    this is what i ended up getting + 110v eheim 1250 pump

    the hunt for 1.025 or better 3rd vidder is on

    once i get it all done its going to be a 24/7 m0nster.. i hope

    goal: ~5.2ghz 980x ~1100/2200/2600 3x 580

    Last edited by NapalmV5; 12-16-2010 at 03:02 PM.

  19. #369
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    4,046
    Quote Originally Posted by Gaul View Post
    @ ts = COMPARE with 6950 CF plz.......same setting MUST



    3D MARK 2011 ( X )
    heres 3dmark11: x4573

    Last edited by NapalmV5; 12-16-2010 at 03:35 PM.

  20. #370
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    IND
    Posts
    1,038
    @ ts = def plzzzzz, my 6950 CF on stock clock

    here 6950 CF def

    HEAVEN
    Last edited by Gaul; 12-16-2010 at 04:12 PM.

  21. #371
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    4,046
    youre doing up to 950.. do 950 vs 950 comparo

    how about clock for clock?


  22. #372
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    IND
    Posts
    1,038
    Quote Originally Posted by NapalmV5 View Post
    youre doing up to 950.. do 950 vs 950 comparo

    how about clock for clock?
    well u must think about prize too....., even 6970 CF still have lower prize than 580 SLI
    anyway no problem, thanx 4 share

    syill wait compare with 580 SLI for my heaven v2.1 same setting.....
    Last edited by Gaul; 12-16-2010 at 04:36 PM.

  23. #373
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    4,046
    lol i could care less if even lower prize aint gonna buy a radeon ever again

  24. #374
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    4,046
    Quote Originally Posted by Gaul View Post
    well u must think about prize too....., even 6970 CF still have lower prize than 580 SLI
    anyway no problem, thanx 4 share

    syill wait compare with 580 SLI for my heaven v2.1 same setting.....
    whats the point.. no matter how we slice it dice it default clocks oced clock for clock the radeons always win lol besides your on an ep45 mobo 8x pcie x 2 and im on 16x pcie x 2 right there the radeons win

  25. #375
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    IND
    Posts
    1,038
    Quote Originally Posted by NapalmV5 View Post
    whats the point.. no matter how we slice it dice it default clocks oced clock for clock the radeons always win lol besides your on an ep45 mobo 8x pcie x 2 and im on 16x pcie x 2 right there the radeons win
    yup mine was 8x/8x on CF coz P45 and...............old q9550
    OK no problemo, I'll be back with 6970 CF then........



    Last edited by Gaul; 12-16-2010 at 05:17 PM.

Page 15 of 34 FirstFirst ... 51213141516171825 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •