GTX580: 1.025VID: 950/1900/2300: stock cooler: guaranteed?!?

[NapalmV5]

@Roch nice

so you comfortable with 900/1800/2200/1.125v 24/7 ?

Very nice result man! Can you please try Cargo Flythrough map in Warhead bench with this settings and post screenshot? It seems for me that this map is a lot heavier than others.

thanx man! yeh this map uses about 250mb mem more than ambush but its no issue i ran it several times just to make sure and im getting these constant results

how does this map compare? i have no clue.. let me know

[Kimofil]

thanx man! yeh this map uses about 250mb mem more than ambush but its no issue i ran it several times just to make sure and im getting these constant results

how does this map compare? i have no clue.. let me know

Very nice FPS you can get with this one mate!

But why you tested it in 32-bit (64bit box unchecked)?
64 bit version have better textures LOD and managed memory a little better. I think you use unpatched version of Warhead without 64-bit support.
This official patch enable 64-bit support for Warhead.

For compare, this is my result on heavy overclocked 5970 and i7 930 (all air), in 64-bit mode with 4xAA. Slightly old drivers, with new average i think will be close to 50...


You can try bench one more with my settings, i cannot use 16xQAA anyway

[NapalmV5]

Very nice FPS you can get with this one mate!

But why you tested it in 32-bit (64bit box unchecked)?
64 bit version have better textures LOD and managed memory a little better. I think you use unpatched version of Warhead without 64-bit support.
This official patch enable 64-bit support for Warhead.

For compare, this is my result on heavy overclocked 5970 and i7 930 (all air), in 64-bit mode with 4xAA. Slightly old drivers, with new average i think will be close to 50...


You can try bench one more with my settings, i cannot use 16xQAA anyway

yes unpatched

before i patched to 64bit aa 4x vs aa 16xq same results @ 32bit

avg fps should be at least 90? but its under 70

[Kimofil]

yes unpatched

before i patched to 64bit aa 4x vs aa 16xq same results @ 32bit

avg fps should be at least 90? but its under 70

It seems like AA level don't matter for tri-sli.
And yes, 64-bit FPS a lower for me too than 32 because of better LOD i think.
Anyway, min FPS a LOT higher

Nice one for stock 6850's, Gaul! But i think with patch in 64-bit mode FPS will be a little lower (about 35 avg i think).


Did a retest with much never drivers and CPU/GPU on stock clock.

[NapalmV5]

It seems like AA level don't matter for tri-sli.
And yes, 64-bit FPS a lower for me too than 32 because of better LOD i think.
Anyway, min FPS a LOT higher

exactly min fps is higher so should max+avg but oh well i guess theres always hope in the next drivers


this is another first ever bench for me: dmc4

4.8ghz 980x/900mhz tri-sli 580/max 1080p

[Kimofil]

exactly min fps is higher so should max+avg but oh well i guess theres always hope in the next drivers


this is another first ever bench for me: dmc4

4.8ghz 980x/900mhz tri-sli 580/max 1080p

Yes the drivers is always the case....
Nice looking fps in dmc4 man

[NapalmV5]

Shadow0001

i know you two are the only ones here so far @ 5760 rez

i just brought it up since you can compare vs 2way sli @ 5760x1080

It seems like AA level don't matter for tri-sli.
And yes, 64-bit FPS a lower for me too than 32 because of better LOD i think.
Anyway, min FPS a LOT higher

Did a retest with much never drivers and CPU/GPU on stock clock.

while tri-sli worx @ ambush map doesnt quite work @ cargo flythrough

tri-sli^ vs sli @ same clocks