Results 1 to 25 of 3724

Thread: AMD Cayman info (or rumor)

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,125
    Quote Originally Posted by tajoh111 View Post
    I have the opposite feeling. If they are going to launch it, launch it early, even if they have no quantities to sell. That way the hype of the 6970 is derailed because it can no longer claim fastest GPU crown.

    If NV had crap loads of cards to sell I could understand your reasoning(as they want to sell a crap load of cards before the 6970 comes out), but it sounds like quantities are horrendous. So NV is not launching this card early to make money obviously. I think launching such a low quantity product is to just steal your competitors fanfare.

    This release is a pure marketing move. If the 6870 was launched before the gtx 460, the release of the gtx 460 would have been a crazy disappointment.

    I think you have to ask yourself? Why would NV release a card that not going to be for sale immediately ahead of it competitor if at the very least it didn't beat it. Their is no logical reason to release it later.
    Well, then why didn't Nvidia do so with Fermi v1.0? It works both ways here

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,656
    Quote Originally Posted by zerazax View Post
    Well, then why didn't Nvidia do so with Fermi v1.0? It works both ways here
    I would say because now they have an established product ready for market even if in limited numbers vs the challenges brought about in just getting v1.0 out of the labs and into the market. I mean we got A3 silicon on gf100, everything since has been A1 silicon hasn't it.
    Work Rig: Asus x58 P6T Deluxe, i7 950 24x166 1.275v, BIX2/GTZ/D5
    3x2048 GSkill pi Black DDR3 1600, Quadro 600
    PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 810

    Game Rig: Asus x58 P6T, i7 970 24x160 1.2v HT on, TRUE120
    3x4096 GSkill DDR3 1600, PNY 660ti
    PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 830

    AMD Rig: Biostar TA790GX A2+, x4 940 16x200, stock hsf
    2x2gb Patriot DDR2 800, PowerColor 4850
    Corsair VX450

  3. #3
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    2,207
    Quote Originally Posted by zerazax View Post
    Well, then why didn't Nvidia do so with Fermi v1.0? It works both ways here
    Because it wasn't ready at all(the card was a mess of wires until the beginning of the year) and reviews would not be the most positive(it wasn't really positive as it was), early models of the card were hitting 500-600mhz, sending such a disastrous card to reviewers would only make AMD look good as the 5870 would have been faster. The only reason NV would release it early is to get positive reviews, otherwise you would just be hyping your competitors up.

    What would you think would happen if NV released a early gtx 480 release and it performed 10 percent less while consuming way more power? That's the answer to your question.

    Even with the current edition of the gtx 480, considering what the card is, it was released to early and should have been fixed before it came out.

    You could say the gtx 480 has a very beta feel to it and was released too early as quantities were bad and their was some obvious flaws in the chip design(no card should have a hole for cooling).
    Last edited by tajoh111; 11-05-2010 at 10:56 PM.
    Core i7 920@ 4.66ghz(H2O)
    6gb OCZ platinum
    4870x2 + 4890 in Trifire
    2*640 WD Blacks
    750GB Seagate.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •