I would say because now they have an established product ready for market even if in limited numbers vs the challenges brought about in just getting v1.0 out of the labs and into the market. I mean we got A3 silicon on gf100, everything since has been A1 silicon hasn't it.
Work Rig: Asus x58 P6T Deluxe, i7 950 24x166 1.275v, BIX2/GTZ/D5
3x2048 GSkill pi Black DDR3 1600, Quadro 600
PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 810
Game Rig: Asus x58 P6T, i7 970 24x160 1.2v HT on, TRUE120
3x4096 GSkill DDR3 1600, PNY 660ti
PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 830
AMD Rig: Biostar TA790GX A2+, x4 940 16x200, stock hsf
2x2gb Patriot DDR2 800, PowerColor 4850
Corsair VX450
Because it wasn't ready at all(the card was a mess of wires until the beginning of the year) and reviews would not be the most positive(it wasn't really positive as it was), early models of the card were hitting 500-600mhz, sending such a disastrous card to reviewers would only make AMD look good as the 5870 would have been faster. The only reason NV would release it early is to get positive reviews, otherwise you would just be hyping your competitors up.
What would you think would happen if NV released a early gtx 480 release and it performed 10 percent less while consuming way more power? That's the answer to your question.
Even with the current edition of the gtx 480, considering what the card is, it was released to early and should have been fixed before it came out.
You could say the gtx 480 has a very beta feel to it and was released too early as quantities were bad and their was some obvious flaws in the chip design(no card should have a hole for cooling).
Last edited by tajoh111; 11-05-2010 at 10:56 PM.
Core i7 920@ 4.66ghz(H2O)
6gb OCZ platinum
4870x2 + 4890 in Trifire
2*640 WD Blacks
750GB Seagate.
Bookmarks