ASUS Crosshair IV Extreme review and AMD WR as bonus!!!

[FlanK3r]

Finally we can see some review great mobo Corsshair IV Extreme in Czech Republic. Is more than good, he has been achieved WR AMD at superpi benchmarks
Thanks WR user and writer of reviews OBR from PCtuning.cz





review ASUS Cross IV Extreme review google translate

[Booj]

Is it just me or is that 1m a little too fast?

[G.Foyle]

OBR has a track record of awesome pi efficiency

[Kal-EL]

Solid benchmarks and clock speeds

[[XC] Oj101]

Better RAM = sub 10m 32m?

Very well done to him

[Final8ty]

Are the 4 all PCI-E slots x16 wired ?

[Tomasis]

congratulations!!!! cant wait for sub 10 min

it did strike me that mem timings are so high? there is big chance for sub 10min

[Manicdan]

how did he get low 9s 1M when most people at clocks like that were getting low 10s?

[K404]

I'd like to see some matx Crosshair boards

[FlanK3r]

Booj and others doubters:

yes, because with superpi and wazza is not cheating, so u can got under10min think. This point is good IMC and high CPU freq. 6909 MHz, NB 4605 MHZ, RAM 2046 MHz 9-8-8-24-40-1T. For 1M at AMD is better higher RAM clock than timings and next +80 MHz CPU clock diference. If u can, try it at home (setings with some RAM clock and timings in 1M, lower timings and lower RAM clock with lower CPU clock, higher RAM clocks with higher CPU clock etc etc. can combined to diferent HT clock, its playing at much much hours :-) )

Look at MADs result, its 2 AMD WR for 1M superpi. I Know from MAD222, he not use tweak OS and not wazza.

CPU clock: 6831 MHz
NB clock: 4807 MHz
RAM 1686MHz 6-6-5-15-11-1T

For me, 1M result is really corect with rules

[[XC] gomeler]

Yeah, that 1M is incredibly fast. The 32M is also a bit funky compared to the top 3 X4 965s. Either CPU-Z is reading the timings wrong or we've all been approaching SPi 32M the wrong way.

[Brian y.]

very nice clocks...

that was done using Windows 7?

[chew*]

the 1m is bugged, got removed from bot just some FYI sub 65K effeciency is not even remotely possible when sub 67K is the goal.

Not to take away from fact that if he runs it again......it will be a 1m wr at those speeds.

[FlanK3r]

gomeler: yes, its quick, but not unreal with this setings, maybe later OBR will test this same chip and tell him record some video...OBR is big talker, but not cheater, believe me.

[FlanK3r]

the 1m is bugged, got removed from bot just some FYI sub 65K effeciency is not even remotely possible when sub 67K is the goal.

Not to take away from fact that if he runs it again......it will be a 1m wr at those speeds.

and with wazza tweak it is impossible do u think? MAD dont used tweak OS etc...think, with some legals tweak it is possible...

[chew*]

and with wazza tweak it is impossible do u think? MAD dont used tweak OS etc...think, with some legals tweak it is possible...

We are talking 1m here..............waza is not shaving off 3k worth of effeciency on a 9 sec bench. The diff from a well tweaked run to a non tweaked run would be lets say 67,900 effeciency versus like 66,900 effeciency.

Don't take my word for it take hwbots Results get removed for reasons, not just for kicks.

In all seriousness the best I have ever seen is sub 67K. This is 64k effec......thats a huge huge jump.......

No one saying he cheated, he just got a bugged run, it happens. No one doubts at those speeds without a bugged run it will surely be 1m record either

[DosDuoNo]

seems legit to me, i sense a lot of, can i say envy here? just because he does something over and above anything that has been seen, doesnt mean it isnt possible.

new tweak maybe?

and heres a random pic of my new invention, going into production 2011,

[Manicdan]

chew dosnt get jealous, he just gets more LN2

[chew*]

seems legit to me, i sense a lot of, can i say envy here? just because he does something over and above anything that has been seen, doesnt mean it isnt possible.

new tweak maybe?

Sure ok i'm jealous and its a new tweak.............

The fact remains it was removed from hwbot.....the question you then need to ask yourself is why.........then you need to follow up that question and ask yourself why OBR did not challenge the fact it was removed.

BTW the 32m result did not get removed. Just some fyi.

[Booj]

Booj and others doubters:

Snip

I don't want to call anyone a cheater unless it's blatant. More likely a bugged run. I'll be the first to congratulate him if such efficiency can be replicated.

[DosDuoNo]

chew dosnt get jealous, he just gets more LN2

i neither said 'Chew*' or 'Jealous' in my post, so exactly where are you getting your info?

as for asking questions, i am pretty good at making my own investigations as to who, when, why and how, as have been not bad at this since i was say............. 4 years old.

its legit, as far as i am concerned, hwbot is a farce, simply in place to massage the ego's of those who pusue its 'brilliance'

have you seen my new trolley bike? wht you think?

[chew*]

its legit, as far as i am concerned, hwbot is a farce, simply in place to massage the ego's of those who pusue its 'brilliance'

Ahhh ok so i'm gonna use OPB tweak and beat that "record" on air then......rules don't seem so bad now.

This is nothing about ego's here this is about software hardware limits and the limit is like sub 67K effeciency until amd does something about CPC performance.

its very simple, clock speed multiplied by result = effec.

try and break 67K, when you realize that task is hard enough sub 65K seems unrealistic.

[DosDuoNo]

Ahhh ok so i'm gonna use OPB tweak and beat that "record" on air then......rules don't seem so bad now.

go right ahead then, but i think your confusing me with someone else





















thats it, you confusing me with someone that actualy cares what you do.

[Manicdan]

i neither said 'Chew*' or 'Jealous' in my post, so exactly where are you getting your info?

which is probably why you thought i was replying to you, instead of giving a sarcastic perspective of chew's laid back personality

visit the AMD section, half his posts are him trying to help others get better results. his knowledge is one of the best that section sees.

[OC Maximus]

need more coffee..........