MMM
Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 158

Thread: Intel to show off Sandy Bridge at IDF next week, AMD counters with Zacate demo nearby

  1. #76
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Budaors, Hungary.
    Posts
    143
    AMD Zacate sneak peak overt at YouTube - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZE2SuJlJCw

    "We are going to hell, so bring your sunblock..."

  2. #77
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,176

  3. #78
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    whau, n1 !!
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  4. #79
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    1,886
    nice fps difference in the 2nd video
    WILL CUDDLE FOR FOOD

    Quote Originally Posted by JF-AMD View Post
    Dual proc client systems are like sex in high school. Everyone talks about it but nobody is really doing it.

  5. #80
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    Quote Originally Posted by Sn0wm@n View Post
    nice fps difference in the 2nd video
    HTML5 is the future,
    the future is Fusion

    math seems accurate to me, lol. glad to see more and more things being done by the gpu.

  6. #81
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    Does the GMA HD even supports HTML5 acceleration?

  7. #82
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Denmark / Aarhus
    Posts
    1,036
    I must say I am not that impressed how it beat the old i5, its only 20-30% and SB should be much faster (More power consumsuing though) but given the gfx capabilities of AMD/ATI I really hope this is one of the smallest versions, unless this test dont scale very well with gfx powers (but then why would amd choose it?)
    Desktop I5-3570k, 8GB Ram, GTX 560, Silverstone TJ08-E, Crucial M4 128GB, 750W Silver Power, ASUS P8Z77-M
    Laptop ThinkPad W520 2720QM /2 x 4 GB ram / Quadro 1000M / Crucial M4 128GB + 500Gb Hdd / FHD Screen / Intel WiFi Link 6300 AGN WLAN / 9 Cell Battery
    Laptop 2 New Macbook Pro Retina / i7 QuadCore / 650 GT / 16GB Ram / 512 GB SSD
    Server: Athlon II X4 640, ASROCK K10N78, 8GB Ram, LSI MegaRaid 8 port, 64GB Vertex 1, 5 x 1 TB WD Raid6, 3 x 3TB Seagate Raid5

  8. #83
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    116
    Looking good, very intrigued by these new low power chips. I think we will see a lot of innovation after companies get their hands on them.
    Flawless heatware (161-0-0)
    http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=43931

  9. #84
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,782
    Quote Originally Posted by Mech0z View Post
    I must say I am not that impressed how it beat the old i5, its only 20-30% and SB should be much faster (More power consumsuing though) but given the gfx capabilities of AMD/ATI I really hope this is one of the smallest versions, unless this test dont scale very well with gfx powers (but then why would amd choose it?)
    I think the GPU & CPU is under 20w. Why complain?
    As quoted by LowRun......"So, we are one week past AMD's worst case scenario for BD's availability but they don't feel like communicating about the delay, I suppose AMD must be removed from the reliable sources list for AMD's products launch dates"

  10. #85
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    1,886
    Quote Originally Posted by Mech0z View Post
    I must say I am not that impressed how it beat the old i5, its only 20-30% and SB should be much faster (More power consumsuing though) but given the gfx capabilities of AMD/ATI I really hope this is one of the smallest versions, unless this test dont scale very well with gfx powers (but then why would amd choose it?)
    huh??? did you take time to see how much fps difference the amd setup pulled compared to the intel setup ???

    the amd setup clearly stayed in the high 30's fps .. closer to 35fps and intel stayed in the mid 20's ... closer to 25fps ... showing a 40+% difference in framerate ... how is that 20 - 30% difference ???
    Last edited by Sn0wm@n; 09-13-2010 at 12:47 PM.
    WILL CUDDLE FOR FOOD

    Quote Originally Posted by JF-AMD View Post
    Dual proc client systems are like sex in high school. Everyone talks about it but nobody is really doing it.

  11. #86
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    Quote Originally Posted by Mech0z View Post
    I must say I am not that impressed how it beat the old i5, its only 20-30% and SB should be much faster (More power consumsuing though) but given the gfx capabilities of AMD/ATI I really hope this is one of the smallest versions, unless this test dont scale very well with gfx powers (but then why would amd choose it?)
    im not sure how many HTML5 sites really exist that would even use gpu speedup yet. also if atom dosnt support it at all, i think that would make an even more shocking comparison. anyone have a atom chip and want to compare (non nvidia gpu pls)

  12. #87
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,176
    Quote Originally Posted by Mech0z View Post
    I must say I am not that impressed how it beat the old i5, its only 20-30% and SB should be much faster (More power consumsuing though) but given the gfx capabilities of AMD/ATI I really hope this is one of the smallest versions, unless this test dont scale very well with gfx powers (but then why would amd choose it?)
    Zacate isn't bulldozer.

    It's a 20w chip including the chipset and igpu

  13. #88
    YouTube Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Klaatu barada nikto
    Posts
    17,574
    Quote Originally Posted by Manicdan View Post
    im not sure how many HTML5 sites really exist that would even use gpu speedup yet. also if atom dosnt support it at all, i think that would make an even more shocking comparison. anyone have a atom chip and want to compare (non nvidia gpu pls)
    I have yet to find a single website that requires more than a 500Mhz K6-2 and 50MB of ram.

    And that is on the excessive side.

    Thus I find it hard to understand, what could people be possibly going to that would require a FULL gpu to speedup the site to a reasonable speed?
    Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
    The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
    http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
    Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was

  14. #89
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    Quote Originally Posted by nn_step View Post
    I have yet to find a single website that requires more than a 500Mhz K6-2 and 50MB of ram.

    And that is on the excessive side.

    Thus I find it hard to understand, what could people be possibly going to that would require a FULL gpu to speedup the site to a reasonable speed?
    looks to be some kind of game with lots of Flash like features.
    vector based rendering i guess is really intensive when you have thousands of of them in a decent resolution. but im not going to act like i know a single thing, cause i dont.

  15. #90
    YouTube Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Klaatu barada nikto
    Posts
    17,574
    Quote Originally Posted by Manicdan View Post
    looks to be some kind of game with lots of Flash like features.
    vector based rendering i guess is really intensive when you have thousands of of them in a decent resolution. but im not going to act like i know a single thing, cause i dont.
    I have not been able to find a single flash game or java application that fits that requirement.

    Could you perhaps point one out so that I may examine its bytecode and come to understand what would truly improve its performance.
    Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
    The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
    http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
    Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was

  16. #91
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    Quote Originally Posted by nn_step View Post
    I have not been able to find a single flash game or java application that fits that requirement.

    Could you perhaps point one out so that I may examine its bytecode and come to understand what would truly improve its performance.
    i wish i could, i dont even know what the hell they showed in that demo. and im not much for games that get played in the browser (last time i did that was on shockwave back in school, talking a decade ago when the computers were sub 400mhz, and enjoyed every bit of it)

  17. #92
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    Quote Originally Posted by nn_step View Post
    I have yet to find a single website that requires more than a 500Mhz K6-2 and 50MB of ram.

    And that is on the excessive side.

    Thus I find it hard to understand, what could people be possibly going to that would require a FULL gpu to speedup the site to a reasonable speed?
    Guess depends on what your doing or better on how you program it...I know some flash animations that need 90%+ cpu time on a haexcore.

  18. #93
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,128
    Quote Originally Posted by nn_step View Post
    I have not been able to find a single flash game or java application that fits that requirement.

    Could you perhaps point one out so that I may examine its bytecode and come to understand what would truly improve its performance.
    I had hard time running a flash game called Vector Tower Defence with a 600 MHz P3 in 2007, the fps was < 5. Also with 416 MHz Celeron Youtube was unusable.

    1.6 GHz Celeron M can't run Youtube fullscreen at all, though that's because of poor flashplayer performance on linux.

    If one blocks all flash content, a 10 year old machine can run 90 % of websites with ease.

  19. #94
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    Quote Originally Posted by Calmatory View Post
    I had hard time running a flash game called Vector Tower Defence with a 600 MHz P3 in 2007, the fps was < 5. Also with 416 MHz Celeron Youtube was unusable.

    1.6 GHz Celeron M can't run Youtube fullscreen at all, though that's because of poor flashplayer performance on linux.

    If one blocks all flash content, a 10 year old machine can run 90 % of websites with ease.
    Guess why every serious web designer despises flash...

  20. #95
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Thessaloniki, Greece
    Posts
    1,307
    Quote Originally Posted by nn_step View Post
    I have not been able to find a single flash game or java application that fits that requirement.

    Could you perhaps point one out so that I may examine its bytecode and come to understand what would truly improve its performance.
    Some of the facebook games run very choppy on a P3 1Ghz Celeron i have.
    Seems we made our greatest error when we named it at the start
    for though we called it "Human Nature" - it was cancer of the heart
    CPU: AMD X3 720BE@ 3,4Ghz
    Cooler: Xigmatek S1283(Terrible mounting system for AM2/3)
    Motherboard: Gigabyte 790FXT-UD5P(F4) RAM: 2x 2GB OCZ DDR3 1600Mhz Gold 8-8-8-24
    GPU:HD5850 1GB
    PSU: Seasonic M12D 750W Case: Coolermaster HAF932(aka Dusty )

  21. #96
    YouTube Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Klaatu barada nikto
    Posts
    17,574
    Quote Originally Posted by Calmatory View Post
    I had hard time running a flash game called Vector Tower Defence with a 600 MHz P3 in 2007, the fps was < 5. Also with 416 MHz Celeron Youtube was unusable.

    1.6 GHz Celeron M can't run Youtube fullscreen at all, though that's because of poor flashplayer performance on linux.

    If one blocks all flash content, a 10 year old machine can run 90 % of websites with ease.
    hmm interesting, using Gnash as my flash Interpreter; it seems to play smoothly and without any problems on my 500Mhz K6-2.

    I'd need more details about your setup to find the point of the slowdown.

    Quote Originally Posted by BrowncoatGR View Post
    Some of the facebook games run very choppy on a P3 1Ghz Celeron i have.
    I need names, so that I can actually experiment on them.


    Quote Originally Posted by xVeinx View Post
    We like to call it flash .
    But WHAT flash applications/games exactly. Something finite and testable please.
    Last edited by nn_step; 09-13-2010 at 01:29 PM.
    Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
    The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
    http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
    Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was

  22. #97
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    580
    Today marks the first day of our IDF 2010 coverage and we just left Dadi Perlmutter's keynote. Keeping up with tradition, Dadi's keynote focused on two of Intel's upcoming microprocessors.

    Westmere-EX



    Sandy Bridge





    Officially Sandy Bridge will be called the 2nd generation Intel Core processor, and here are the new logos:



    Intel confirmed that Sandy Bridge has dedicated video transcode hardware that it demoed during the keynote. The demo used Cyberlink's Media Espresso to convert a ~1 minute long 30Mbps 1080p HD video clip to an iPhone compatible format. On Sandy Bridge the conversion finished in a matter of a few seconds (< 10 seconds by my watch).



    http://www.anandtech.com/show/3916/i...anscode-engine

  23. #98
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    new thread maybe?

  24. #99
    PCMark V Meister
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Athens GR
    Posts
    771
    does anyone knows any link for livestream to IDF???

  25. #100
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Budaors, Hungary.
    Posts
    143
    Quote Originally Posted by Tiltevros View Post
    does anyone knows any link for livestream to IDF???
    TechReport has some sort of live blogroll of the event. http://www.techreport.com/articles.x/19626

    "We are going to hell, so bring your sunblock..."

Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •