MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 954

Thread: AMD's Bobcat and Bulldozer

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,782
    Quote Originally Posted by Oj101 View Post
    I don't care about the FUD, I care that it's time to upgrade my 965BE and I can't wait for BD's release I'm almost tempted to go for server hardware to satisfy myself
    A year from now you'll see BD for the desktop. If you want something faster than your 965, then grab a cheap X6 1055 and wait until Q3 of next year or grab a Sandy Bridge setup from Intel. And this coming from an AMD user.
    Last edited by freeloader; 09-02-2010 at 10:14 AM.
    As quoted by LowRun......"So, we are one week past AMD's worst case scenario for BD's availability but they don't feel like communicating about the delay, I suppose AMD must be removed from the reliable sources list for AMD's products launch dates"

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    138
    Quote Originally Posted by freeloader View Post
    A year from now you'll see BD for the desktop. If you want something faster than your 965, then grab a cheap X6 1055 and wait until Q3 of next year or grab a Sandy Bridge setup from Intel. And this coming from an AMD user.
    I think you could rather buy an octy MC and a dual socket mobo... this will be somewhat future-proof... as after BD comes you should be able to run it with a simple bios update... which is not something that you could say about Intel platforms (both server and desktop) and AMD's desktop offerings at this point in time...

    Edit: Makes for an incredible value proposition too... what with the cheapest MC coming in at $290 appx and dual socket board for about $450
    FYR...
    Mobo... http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813131643
    CPU... http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819105266
    Last edited by tifosi; 09-03-2010 at 12:06 AM.

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by tifosi View Post
    I think you could rather buy an octy MC and a dual socket mobo... this will be somewhat future-proof... as after BD comes you should be able to run it with a simple bios update... which is not something that you could say about Intel platforms (both server and desktop) and AMD's desktop offerings at this point in time...

    Edit: Makes for an incredible value proposition too... what with the cheapest MC coming in at $290 appx and dual socket board for about $450
    FYR...
    Mobo... http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813131643
    CPU... http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819105266
    The big problem with AMDs dual server boards are that they are not overclockable!

    If the MC dual boards ever came out as an overclockable workstation board, then I would by two or three of them!

    If MC or BD CPUs came out unlocked (like Intel's) runs at around 3.0 GHz, then I would buy four to six CPUs!

    If AMD released BD as an Phenom FX CPU for G34 or whatever socket that comes out, then I would buy four to six of those CPUs!
    Last edited by scorpidragon; 09-03-2010 at 01:42 AM.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    138
    Quote Originally Posted by scorpidragon View Post
    The big problem with AMDs dual server boards are that they are not overclockable!

    If the MC dual boards ever came out as an overclockable workstation board, then I would by two or three of them!

    If MC or BD CPUs came out unlocked (like Intel's) runs at around 3.0 GHz, then I would buy four to six CPUs!

    If AMD released BD as an Phenom FX CPU for G34 or whatever socket that comes out, then I would buy four to six of those CPUs!
    Did you really miss this thread?

    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=233565

    This bloke blew the pants off of the opty :P

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by tifosi View Post
    Did you really miss this thread?

    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=233565

    This bloke blew the pants off of the opty :P
    Not really interested in that thread.

    The reason as to why I am not interested in G34 server boards are that they cannot be overclocked!

  6. #6
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    1,886
    Quote Originally Posted by scorpidragon View Post
    Not really interested in that thread.

    The reason as to why I am not interested in G34 server boards are that they cannot be overclocked!

    opterons have dual link ht so they can talk between themselves .. so you will need to look into server motherboard ... nothing else .. sorry but what you are dreaming about has to come from the server world ...


    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman View Post
    Me..Four systems running here and none are single socket.
    Why? Here's some reasons:
    1) Boards are better quality
    2) Electrical usage for a given job done is better.

    3) Space: The duals outperform the singles by a wide margin and take essentially the same space
    4) Buy top boards,they don't break and I mean DON'T.
    Whens the last time you saw a single socket board run 3+ years at 100% load with out a boot other than from a electrical outage or twice a year cleaning?
    I see that all the time.
    5) Time effectiveness: Toss any muti threaded task on a dualie and it's done much faster than any single socket machine can do.

    Ok,thats settled, back on topic now.

    Oh, I forgot one thing:
    6) E-PEEN!

    how much did all your dually system cost you ????

    and yes i know people like to oc stuff up .. but only people on xs ... most people use their stock clocks system without any problem ... .. BUT THOSE PEOPLE WORK and dont game ....

    and to tell you the truth my single socket am2 opteron never did have to shutdown for a whole 13 months .. and i did a reboot only because a hdd crashed ....


    e-peen is all that matters to people oc'ing dual socket boards ....
    Last edited by Sn0wm@n; 09-12-2010 at 05:17 PM.
    WILL CUDDLE FOR FOOD

    Quote Originally Posted by JF-AMD View Post
    Dual proc client systems are like sex in high school. Everyone talks about it but nobody is really doing it.

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Sn0wm@n View Post
    opterons have dual link ht so they can talk between themselves .. so you will need to look into server motherboard ... nothing else .. sorry but what you are dreaming about has to come from the server world ...
    Yeah I'd say so. But I have heard that AMD maybe bring out a new 1P/2P board that will target high-end users?

    Looks like I will need 12 threaded CPU then.

    So that means I'll need the following then:
    Phenom FX 12 core 3.2GHz CPU (with MCM Thuban) for socket G34.
    16GB to 32GB DDR3 RAM.
    SATA6 x4/x8 PCIe RAID card.
    USB 3.0 x4 PCIe card.
    Radeon HD5850/6850 PCIe card.

  8. #8
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    Quote Originally Posted by Sn0wm@n View Post
    e-peen is all that matters to people oc'ing dual socket boards ....
    If I've said it once, I've said it probably four or five times: This is simply not true. Believe it or not, some of us aren't 100% work or 100% play.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •