Results 1 to 25 of 807

Thread: Areca 1880

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    2,838
    Nizzen surpassed 100.000 4K rr iops last night using the C300s, not sure of what settings he used.

    (might have been the read ahead stuff, I'll ask him)
    -
    Hardware:

  2. #2
    RAIDer
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    699
    Quote Originally Posted by Anvil View Post
    Nizzen surpassed 100.000 4K rr iops last night using the C300s, not sure of what settings he used.

    (might have been the read ahead stuff, I'll ask him)
    It passed 100k @ qQD and the "default" controller settings where used. HDD Read Ahead Cache: enabled
    Volume Data Read Ahead: Normal
    Volume Stripe Size: 4k
    Tagged Command Queuing: enabled
    Volume Cache Mode: Writeback

    12 workers in Iometer
    Align i/o : ON "4k"
    Last edited by Nizzen; 08-31-2010 at 10:32 AM.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    133
    Help someone with areca 1880. I have just recieved the cables 3ware and on connecting the card up to 2 x Intel 80GB G1's in default raid 0 my results have me confused.



    atto result



    Previous ICH10 Intel raid 0



    Every time I run atto it seems low numbers appear on some of the reads. I have set and redone the array even tried changing cables still same results inconsitency. Can anyone point me where might the problem lie. just got back in from work so probably something I missed. BTW these results are taken from OS on normal HD with win7 and drivers installed for card etc. My HD teach for the intels on ICH 10 was around 525MB across the board.

    Crystal mark is better
    old intel

    seq = 565.7 write 158.1
    512k = 368.7 write 151.2
    4k = 18.74 write 121.4
    4kqd32 = 240.9 write 140.6

    new areca
    seq = 553 write 179.9
    512 = 593 write 191.9
    4k = 22.98 write 130.3
    4kqd32 = 225.5 write 157.2

    0 fill 512 cache enabled

    So why the strange atto. Long bench HDtach is very good?

    hmm downloaded newer version atto results speak for themselves.



    And long bench areca but short still shows 300 odd must be glitch or untrustworthy bench or cache. Looks good otherwise

    Last edited by DeViTTo; 08-31-2010 at 11:18 AM.
    System:


    Asus P8P67 Deluxe 2600K 4.8Ghz 5970 4GB Corsiar GT 2000 Areca 1880i & Corsair F40 and 2 Intel 80 Watercooled DDC 120.3

  4. #4
    SLC
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    2,795
    Both ATTO and HDtach are no good at measuring things. ATTO works fine only if there is no cache.

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    133
    I know the cache plays into the score, but I still think something is not quite right here is my intel score 1gb and areca 1gb so taking away the cache which on my card is only 512mb anyways. Please someone chirp in if you know why my reads on the areca at 1 gb should be so low.

    Intel


    Areca


    Anyone?
    System:


    Asus P8P67 Deluxe 2600K 4.8Ghz 5970 4GB Corsiar GT 2000 Areca 1880i & Corsair F40 and 2 Intel 80 Watercooled DDC 120.3

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •