Orignal link in English
http://translate.google.co.uk/transl....htm%26hl%3Den
Orignal link in English
http://translate.google.co.uk/transl....htm%26hl%3Den
funny stuff there.
haha joke
Intel Core i5 6600K + ASRock Z170 OC Formula + Galax HOF 4000 (8GBx2) + Antec 1200W OC Version
EK SupremeHF + BlackIce GTX360 + Swiftech 655 + XSPC ResTop
Macbook Pro 15" Late 2011 (i7 2760QM + HD 6770M)
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) , Huawei Nexus 6P
[history system]80286 80386 80486 Cyrix K5 Pentium133 Pentium II Duron1G Athlon1G E2180 E3300 E5300 E7200 E8200 E8400 E8500 E8600 Q9550 QX6800 X3-720BE i7-920 i3-530 i5-750 Semp140@x2 955BE X4-B55 Q6600 i5-2500K i7-2600K X4-B60 X6-1055T FX-8120 i7-4790K
Question : Why do some overclockers switch into d*ckmode when money is involved
Remark : They call me Pro AsusSaaya yupp, I agree
Last edited by Mungri; 08-29-2010 at 11:29 PM.
anyway, "at least" was not meant regarding the number of slotsm, which are 4, but regarding the number of features. there is at least the feature of bringing 4 slots. "at least" in this situation is a term i use in my native language but might be confusing in english ...
each slot uses 16 pcix lanes, so all cards are capable of using full 16x bandwidth for communication to an other card.
have no idea how much communication takes place between cards and how much takes place between the cards and the processor when using sli? but as said before, communication between the cards might use 16x bandwidth.
as already mentioned by somebody: the only interface between this expander and the motherboard are the two pcix slots at the back. so i assume, as long as slot spacing permits, this expander could be used on other boards too. but thats just an assumption.
Processor: Intel Core i7 990X
Motherboard: ASUS Rampage III Extreme
Memory: Corsair CMT6GX3M3A2000C8
Video Card: MSI N680GTX Lightning
Power Supply: Seasonic S12 650W
Case: Chieftec BH-01B-B-B
Well, even if the slot spacing isn't the same, there are flexible PCIe risers which could solve the problem.
BIOS support is much more of an issue.
Last edited by rado992; 08-30-2010 at 01:13 AM.
Excep!!! Oh My Good!
I2I3 Impacta OC Team
http://hard1xtreme.wordpress.com/
My Hwbot Points
i7 860 @ 4.4Ghz - TRUE COPPER - Evga Classified 200 - 4GB Mushkin 1.7Ghz cas6 - 2x SSD WD Silicom 128GB Raid0 - GTX 580 0.95Ghz - Rec Cougar 1000W - CM ACTS 840
i7 2600K @ 4.6Ghz - H70 @ 150CFM - Gigabyte P67A - UD7 - 16GB RipjawsX 2133Mhz Cas9 - 2TB Raid1 - 1.25TB - XFX 8400GS - Corsair HX 1000W - G15 - Razer 2000DPI - Philips HT3365X - TT Armor Modded
a fairy showed up?
insulation: but it worked out in the end? k...
slot spacing: just use flexible pciE risers...
code? what code? why do you have to lay hands on any code?
mhhhh no, each pair of cards can talk to each other through 16 lanes, when the pair wants to talk to the other pair they talk through 8 lanes, and to the nf200, which talks to the IOH, which talks to the other nf200, which then knocks on the door of the other pair
thats why nvidia actually recommended all board partners to piggyback dual nf200 chips, so the hops stay low...
nf200_1 connected to vga_1 and nf200_2 which is connected to vga_2 and vga_3
of course back then it was all about tri sli...
but even for tri sli this config made no sense because hops between cards dont actually matter as it turns out... cause despite what nvidia claimed, the inter card communication doesnt really need a lot of bw and low latency...
so what really matters is bandwidth to the cpu and low latency to the cpu... and for the first the nf200s dont do anything, 8 per card stays 8 per card (bandwidth wise), and for the latter they make things worse...
the only reason there are nf200s at all is cause nvidia wont allow 4way sli without it...
If only you can crunch with NF200 chips..
is their any downflaws in using the xpander? Looks mad but im not sure how well it would go lol
Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?
Bookmarks