How about 2GB/s + raid-5 read?
The array was buildt in 10 minutes
8xc300 128gb in raid-5
How about 2GB/s + raid-5 read?
The array was buildt in 10 minutes
8xc300 128gb in raid-5
@ Nizzen
Nice, but only ATTO?
Please try AS SSD Benchmark (+ copy), FC-Test (create, read, copy) and IO-Meter (Workstation, Database and Fileserver) too
And maybay some real-world-benches???
@ all
Who can confirm this?
Drives > 2TB with SATA2/SAS-Controller "bad"
Drives > 2TB with 6Gb-Controller "good"
That is to say my ARC-1261ML cannot brake 32TB-Barriere (16x 2TB)
edit:
The Problem is the sector-size 512b
Last edited by F.E.A.R.; 08-27-2010 at 07:19 AM.
there is a document on arecas website fittingly called "over 2TB" under manuals that should have a better explanation:
http://www.areca.com.tw/support/main.htm
"Lurking" Since 1977
Jesus Saves, God Backs-Up *I come to the news section to ban people, not read complaints.*-[XC]GomelerDon't believe Squish, his hardware does control him!
You mean >2TB per volume (e.g. Raid-Array), but i mean >2TB for a single drive
The ARC-1880 spupports both (volume an drive >2TB).
Still haven't got my cables they were delivered to wrong address today and its bank holiday here so Tuesday earliest. I have just bought 4 Corsair F40 coming Tuesday also so I will try them on the card.
I couldn't believe the price of them value wise and with this card they should preform well I hope. Still keep my 2 Intels though. Seems these little drives are perfect for raiding and cost performance ratio
System:
Asus P8P67 Deluxe 2600K 4.8Ghz 5970 4GB Corsiar GT 2000 Areca 1880i & Corsair F40 and 2 Intel 80 Watercooled DDC 120.3
Based on what I have read i agree, the little F40's should be great in raid.
Hello? More benches please
Here is my Norwegian forum thread about ARC 1880
http://www.diskusjon.no/index.php?showtopic=1255245
Thx
When the BBU for ARC-1880 will become available?
@ Nizzen
Please try the new AS SSD Benchmark (+ copy-benchmark)
http://alex-is.de/PHP/fusion/downloads.php?cat_id=4
Wow
Is very good
It's OK, not great though.
Sequential is good
Random so-so
My PB score on the ICH is 1670, not sure how it compares to the 9260, I guess the 1GB cache gives the Areca the edge.
-
Hardware:
Nizzen is currently running the default config -> 1GB
The 1880IX-12/16/24 are user upgradable to 4GB
(Note that not all models are upgradable to 4GB)
-
Hardware:
For only 1G of cache - good job Mr Nizzen!
I think my PB AS SSD is 1945 - 5xacard 1231ML-4G - and that's pulling out all the stops -
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...03&postcount=1
Last edited by SteveRo; 08-29-2010 at 10:25 AM.
Wonder if Areca still uses old heatsink dimensions on 1880ix series.
12xx heatsink:
Anyone?
Just let me say everything can be cooled a different way.
Last edited by baldux; 08-29-2010 at 03:57 PM.
Have a Mips singleslot for 12xx series but I guess nobody has tried one of those on new 1880 series.
The heatsink shot above is from 12xx series. From photos it looks like even the singleslot version will fit as Areca hasn't changed much according the position of the cards processors.
btw: Grüße ins luxx.
Last edited by baldux; 08-29-2010 at 03:35 PM.
Bookmarks