MMM
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 63

Thread: JEDEC reveals DDR4 roadmaps and specs

  1. #1
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    4,308

    JEDEC reveals DDR4 roadmaps and specs




    At a recent MemCon conference in Tokyo, Japan, Bill Gervasi, vice president of engineering at US Modular and a member of the JEDEC board of directors, revealed that the target effective clock-speeds for DDR4 memory would be 2133MHz - 4266MHz, an increase from previously discussed frequencies. Apparently, JEDEC and memory manufacturers decided that the progress of DDR3 leaves no space for DDR4 data rates below 2133Mb/s.

    The designers of DDR4 memory are looking forward 1.2V and 1.1V voltage settings for the new memory type and are even considering 1.05V option to greatly reduce power consumption of the forthcoming systems. It is expected that manufacturers of dynamic random access memory (DRAM) will have to use advanced fabrication technology to make the DDR4 chips. The first chips are likely to be made using 32nm or 36nm process technologies.

    At present JEDEC expects to finalize the DDR4 specification in 2011 and start commercial production in 2012. Actual mass transition to the next-generation memory is projected to occur towards 2015.
    English source: http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/memory/...Hz_Report.html

    More extensive japanese-english google translation report with lots of slides: http://translate.google.com/translat...ml&sl=ja&tl=en
    Last edited by RPGWiZaRD; 08-17-2010 at 05:04 AM.
    Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs

    If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place

  2. #2
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    where can i get ddr3 2133 @1.25v?
    and the dates are really confusing, are they saying that they will have all the speeds availible by 2015, or thats when all platforms have transitioned, idk what to think, and the translator isnt the best

    EDIT, i actually like some of the images
    like this one:

    and
    Last edited by Manicdan; 08-17-2010 at 05:21 AM.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Evje, Norway
    Posts
    3,419
    Lol @ DDR3 2133 1.25v
    Quote Originally Posted by iddqd View Post
    Not to be outdone by rival ATi, nVidia's going to offer its own drivers on EA Download Manager.
    X2 555 @ B55 @ 4050 1.4v, NB @ 2700 1.35v Fuzion V1
    Gigabyte 890gpa-ud3h v2.1
    HD6950 2GB swiftech MCW60 @ 1000mhz, 1.168v 1515mhz memory
    Corsair Vengeance 2x4GB 1866 cas 9 @ 1800 8.9.8.27.41 1T 110ns 1.605v
    C300 64GB, 2X Seagate barracuda green LP 2TB, Essence STX, Zalman ZM750-HP
    DDC 3.2/petras, PA120.3 ek-res400, Stackers STC-01,
    Dell U2412m, G110, G9x, Razer Scarab

  4. #4
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    VA, USA
    Posts
    932
    Honestly though... Ram isn't a major energy eater right?
    It only uses what 5W?


    ^^^^
    Click me

  5. #5
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    Quote Originally Posted by eXa View Post
    Lol @ DDR3 2133 1.25v
    looking at the roadmap, its due out early 2012

  6. #6
    Nerdy Powerlifter
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Down in the Bayou
    Posts
    4,553
    Funny how DDR2 is shown as 400 to 800. There's a lot of high bins out there.

    As everyone else has said, DDR3 2133 @ 1.25v!? WTF. My ECO kits are 1600 & run at 1.35v and I figured that was low for the aggressive timings.

    Has Intel or AMD even mentioned a socket using DDR4 at this point?
    You must [not] advance.


    Current Rig: i7 4790k @ stock (**** TIM!) , Zotac GTX 1080 WC'd 2214mhz core / 5528mhz Mem, Asus z-97 Deluxe

    Heatware

  7. #7
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    guys i posted the roadmap for a reason.

    the initial arrow chart is a horrible representation of their schedule

  8. #8
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Evje, Norway
    Posts
    3,419
    To my defence, i posted before your edit :P

    Edit: Hmm.... timestamps says otherwise, but i swear, i didnt see the roadmap before i posted.
    Quote Originally Posted by iddqd View Post
    Not to be outdone by rival ATi, nVidia's going to offer its own drivers on EA Download Manager.
    X2 555 @ B55 @ 4050 1.4v, NB @ 2700 1.35v Fuzion V1
    Gigabyte 890gpa-ud3h v2.1
    HD6950 2GB swiftech MCW60 @ 1000mhz, 1.168v 1515mhz memory
    Corsair Vengeance 2x4GB 1866 cas 9 @ 1800 8.9.8.27.41 1T 110ns 1.605v
    C300 64GB, 2X Seagate barracuda green LP 2TB, Essence STX, Zalman ZM750-HP
    DDC 3.2/petras, PA120.3 ek-res400, Stackers STC-01,
    Dell U2412m, G110, G9x, Razer Scarab

  9. #9
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    lol, no biggy, i just wish they had a smaller version cause we dont care about anything pre 2005

  10. #10
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,079
    2015 is sooo far away.

  11. #11
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    Interesting stuff. I'm more excited to see that we can start expecting realistically priced 4GB DDR3 modules next year.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  12. #12
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    970
    DDR3 has at least 2 years life span...
    Main Rig:
    Processor & Motherboard:AMD Ryzen5 1400 ' Gigabyte B450M-DS3H
    Random Access Memory Module:Adata XPG DDR4 3000 MHz 2x8GB
    Graphic Card:XFX RX 580 4GB
    Power Supply Unit:FSP AURUM 92+ Series PT-650M
    Storage Unit:Crucial MX 500 240GB SATA III SSD
    Processor Heatsink Fan:AMD Wraith Spire RGB
    Chasis:Thermaltake Level 10GTS Black

  13. #13
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    210
    Quote Originally Posted by [XC] Synthetickiller View Post
    As everyone else has said, DDR3 2133 @ 1.25v!? WTF. My ECO kits are 1600 & run at 1.35v and I figured that was low for the aggressive timings.
    You need advanced process tech for that. For example Samsung just started their 3X nm RAM chip production in July, they claim to produce DDR3-2133 @1,5V:
    Samsung's 30nm-class 2Gb Green DDR3 chips provide the highest performance solution in the industry, based on an innovative circuit design. For server applications, memory modules can reach up to 1.866 gigabits per second (Gbps) at 1.35 volts, while PC modules can run at up to 2.133Gbps (1.5 volts), which is 3.5 times faster than DDR2 and 1.6 times faster than 50nm-class DDR3.
    http://www.samsung.com/us/business/s...o?news_id=1180

    Expect some nice DDR3-2133 modules in 2011. Maybe they will already be ready with the introduction of sandy bridge in Q4.

  14. #14
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    960
    Will Rambus have a say (licensing fees) on DDR4?

  15. #15
    I am Xtreme Ket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    6,822
    For those reading the chart wrong, DDR4 will be introduced 2012, with its life ending sometime 2015. Expect DDR3 to get up to bins around 2500 before the end of its life.

    "Prowler"
    X570 Tomahawk | R7 3700X | 2x16GB Klevv BoltX @ 3600MHz CL18 | Powercolor 6800XT Red Devil | Xonar DX 7.1 | 2TB Barracuda | 256GB & 512GB Asgard NVMe drives | 2x DVD & Blu-Ray opticals | EVGA Supernova 1000w G2

    Cooling:

    6x 140mm LED fans, 1x 200mm LED fan | Modified CoolerMaster Masterliquid 240

    Asrock Z77 thread! | Asrock Z77 Extreme6 Review | Asrock P67 Extreme4 Review | Asrock P67 Extreme4/6 Pro3 thread | Asrock Z68 Extreme4 thread | Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Review | Asrock Z68 Gen3 Thread | 8GB G-Skill review | TK 2.ZERO homepage | P5Q series mBIOS thread
    Modded X570 Aorus UEFIs

  16. #16
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    DDR2 lasted 4.5 years
    DDR3 is looking to be 5.5 years
    DDR4 ends in 2015, but then its only 3.5 years

    so that makes it look like DDR3 is lasting longer than expected, and taking away form DDR4s lifespan

    also theres the overlap, which existed for all DDR standards, but they dont show any date based overlap for DDR4, but a massive overlap in speeds,
    DDR4 at 1.6Gbit while we would already have DDR3 at 2.1Gbit

    i wonder if they are trying to perfect the schedule, instead of predicting what will actually pan out.

    im still just gonna wait for platform dates of the next BD, no point for me going to DDR3 now with thuban, and it might not be worth it for AM3+ if the second revision of BD is going to be AM4 only

  17. #17
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    4,308
    Quote Originally Posted by Ket View Post
    For those reading the chart wrong, DDR4 will be introduced 2012, with its life ending sometime 2015. Expect DDR3 to get up to bins around 2500 before the end of its life.
    Yea correct, it starts appearing on the market 2012 altough at low volume ofc and they expect around 2015 to correspond to the state what DDR3 is in now in volumes & usage etc. I doubt 2015 will be EOL for DDR4 though but probably DDR5 or whatever will start appearing around that time in very low volume production.
    Last edited by RPGWiZaRD; 08-17-2010 at 09:23 AM.
    Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs

    If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place

  18. #18
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    The chart shows DDR3 ending in 2015, not DDR4. DDR4 will be virtually all that is produced in 2015 is what it is saying, kind of like DDR3 by the end of next year.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  19. #19
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    i see ddr3 ending in Q3 2012

  20. #20
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    4,308
    Quote Originally Posted by Manicdan View Post
    i see ddr3 ending in Q3 2012
    No, it's just around that time production of DDR3 gets slightly lower in favor making room for DDR4 production according to the graph. How logical is it that in like 2 years there would be no DDR3 left, you can still easily find DDR2 today (altough prices and availability sucks). :p
    Last edited by RPGWiZaRD; 08-17-2010 at 09:43 AM.
    Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs

    If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place

  21. #21
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    148
    Quote Originally Posted by Kurz View Post
    Honestly though... Ram isn't a major energy eater right?
    It only uses what 5W?
    Pretty much, however if you look to the server environment, with a dozen or more DIMM's, you find that the power draw of memory can reach 15% of total system power. For a 300 watt system, that's quite a lot of power.
    Core I7 920 4.2 ghz (21x200) 1.35 volts / Asus P6T / Corsair XMS 1333mhz @ 1600mhz / EVGA GTX 285 SSC (724 core/1634 shaders / 1508 mem) / Modified ThermalTake Armor

    Swiftech Apogee, MCW-60, Swiftech 655, Black Ice GTX 360

  22. #22
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    251
    The only advancement in RAM I am interested in, is higher density at low cost.

    Intel Core i7 3770K | Asus Maximus V Gene | 16GB DDR3-1600 | Asus GTX 670 directCU TOP | Intel 320 120GB | WD Caviar Black 1TB | Enermax Revolution 1050W | Silverstone TJ08-E | Dell UltraSharp U2711

  23. #23
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    France - Bx
    Posts
    2,601



  24. #24
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    Quote Originally Posted by RPGWiZaRD View Post
    No, it's just around that time production of DDR3 gets slightly lower in favor making room for DDR4 production according to the graph. How logical is it that in like 2 years there would be no DDR3 left, you can still easily find DDR2 today (altough prices and availability sucks). :p
    i think the confusion is that we are not looking at production or sales, but simply when standards are made. you can buy 2133 DDR3 now, but its official JEDEC wont be out for a little while longer.

    so in 2012 the standards for DDR3 will stop, the fastest official ram will be established and then they wont go beyond that.

    if im reading it correctly, i wouldnt expect DDR4 in production until very early 2013

  25. #25
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    Quote Originally Posted by Manicdan View Post
    i see ddr3 ending in Q3 2012
    It's important to note that the title of this chart is regarding the transition and also take notice of the tapers both on the rising and falling edge of each technology.



    As you can see above, DDR4 starts trickling into volume production at the end of 2012 by this chart. DDR3 isn't suddenly gone at that point. Instead, you can see that DDR3 begins its decline at that same point--it doesn't suddenly drop dead. Volume DDR3 production doesn't taper off entirely until some time in 2016. Likewise, DDR2 production won't be completely dead until the very beginning of 2012, about 8 months before DDR4 volume production is projected to start. Between those two points in 2012, DDR3 will be virtually all that is produced.

    Perhaps it would be more clear if I translated the graph into a textual time line for you.

    Late 2007: DDR2 Volume Production Begins Decline, DDR3 Volume Production Begins
    Early 2012: DDR2 Volume Production Ends, DDR3 Volume Production Becomes Only Type
    Late 2012: DDR3 Volume Production Begins Decline, DDR4 Volume Production Begins
    Mid 2016: DDR3 Volume Production Ends, [And Probably DDR4 Volume Production Becomes Only Type]
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •