MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 196

Thread: GTX 460 1GB OC database

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    I am Xtreme Ket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    6,822
    Quote Originally Posted by papatsonis View Post
    you are indeed... i...t alongside with troll... you invent this BS post -again- to explain something completely different.. the linear performance increase proportional to gpu clock increase vs... driver's perfomance improvements over previous driver... the problem is you have no logic... trying to collerate these, to totally different case... no worries... as i said in previous post... "The smart admits... the idiot insists.. again and again..."
    I just knew you couldn't resist. Heres a couple screenshots. Kindly eat humble pie, stfu, and let the thread get back on topic





    Difference between 810 core and 875 core: 4.34FPS

    Yup, thats pretty much smack on what I was saying of a 5FPS increase.

    "Prowler"
    X570 Tomahawk | R7 3700X | 2x16GB Klevv BoltX @ 3600MHz CL18 | Powercolor 6800XT Red Devil | Xonar DX 7.1 | 2TB Barracuda | 256GB & 512GB Asgard NVMe drives | 2x DVD & Blu-Ray opticals | EVGA Supernova 1000w G2

    Cooling:

    6x 140mm LED fans, 1x 200mm LED fan | Modified CoolerMaster Masterliquid 240

    Asrock Z77 thread! | Asrock Z77 Extreme6 Review | Asrock P67 Extreme4 Review | Asrock P67 Extreme4/6 Pro3 thread | Asrock Z68 Extreme4 thread | Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Review | Asrock Z68 Gen3 Thread | 8GB G-Skill review | TK 2.ZERO homepage | P5Q series mBIOS thread
    Modded X570 Aorus UEFIs

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    258
    Quote Originally Posted by Ket View Post
    I just knew you couldn't resist. Heres a couple screenshots. Kindly eat humble pie, stfu, and let the thread get back on topic





    Difference between 810 core and 875 core: 4.34FPS

    Yup, thats pretty much smack on what I was saying of a 5FPS increase.
    Sorry for taking too long.. but here with 38 degrees ambient.. is only beach time.. not answering BS posts like yours.. anyway.

    you make me laugh each time i read your desperate BS... trying to still convince the ppl they read this "conflict", that you 're mrRight...

    the only difference is that this time.. you got pwned by your own... post... (saved the pictures just in case you remove them..)

    as you also can(??) see going from 810mhz to 875mhz (8% gpu increase) you get.. a mere of 3.6% fps increase.. or in absolute numbers.. 1.17fps. PWN No1.

    Even "ROCKS" know that an idiot who runs crysis test only 1 loop will have drop outs in fps while hdd is loading, or even because of inadequate cpu to process physics/explosion(2).Tip.. try to run crysis bench 3loops for example to see in 3rd loop, if you have constant/same results with 2nd loop(avg and min obviously).Also from your incoherent increase in average fps versus gpu increase, reveals that you -might- have a weak cpu to assist this 460..

    so this time that 120% you won't resist to reply with BS.. (as i said.. ,the idiot.. insists on..) post screenshots with 3-4 loop runs results... and stop trying to be "smart ass".. cause while im almost sure for the latter.. im not quite sure(the opposite in fact) for the 1st...

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •