MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 61

Thread: GSKILL FLARE achieves highest AMD ram frequency

Hybrid View

  1. 07-26-2010, 02:00 AM #1
    [XC] Oj101
    [XC] Oj101 is offline
    NooB MOD
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    5,799
    Enable your disabled cores and you should lose the red cross.

    Very nice clocks there Get that NB-F up
    Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
    Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!


    Quote Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides View Post
    Intel is about to get athlon'd
    Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 07-26-2010, 02:01 AM #2
    youngpro
    youngpro is offline
    PIfection
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    989
    Quote Originally Posted by Oj101 View Post
    Enable your disabled cores and you should lose the red cross.
    OH REALLY? i dont even need them disabled, just disabled them to see if it would help and never re-enabled... thanks dude

    thanks all for your kind comments... i dont normally bench this sort of thing, but it is definatly addictive, especially when only 10mhz away from 1200...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 07-26-2010, 12:57 PM #3
    [XC] Oj101
    [XC] Oj101 is offline
    NooB MOD
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    5,799
    Quote Originally Posted by youngpro View Post
    OH REALLY? i dont even need them disabled, just disabled them to see if it would help and never re-enabled... thanks dude

    thanks all for your kind comments... i dont normally bench this sort of thing, but it is definatly addictive, especially when only 10mhz away from 1200...
    Cool man, I discovered it while pushing a 940 a while ago. Disabled cores somehow give a rejected validation
    Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
    Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!


    Quote Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides View Post
    Intel is about to get athlon'd
    Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 07-26-2010, 01:36 PM #4
    Hyperhorn
    Hyperhorn is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Germany/Bavaria
    Posts
    462
    Send a message via ICQ to Hyperhorn Send a message via MSN to Hyperhorn
    Quote Originally Posted by Oj101 View Post
    Disabled cores somehow give a rejected validation
    Sure, but anything can give you a rejected validation. This is my rejection list for AMD - 2010 only:
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1195750
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1195722
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1179163
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1151384
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1145535
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1145527
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1141491
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1140714
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1140511
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=943983
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=943961

    46 % of my validations were rejected. It happend with different OSes, mainboards, chipsets, CPUs and core amounts. It´s just random and annoying as hell.

    @youngpro: Great results! Did you test how much you can gain from subzero temps? I figured out a DDR3-2200+ DC validation @ air is done easily within a few minutes, so I´m curious what to expect by changing to subzero. Would have tried that weeks ago, but lost confidence about non-rejected results...
    The Initial value finished
    ...
    PI calculation is done!

    Quote Originally Posted by Zeus View Post
    Software tweaks are not for sale.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 07-26-2010, 01:58 PM #5
    [XC] Oj101
    [XC] Oj101 is offline
    NooB MOD
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    5,799
    Quote Originally Posted by Hyperhorn View Post
    Sure, but anything can give you a rejected validation. This is my rejection list for AMD - 2010 only:
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1195750
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1195722
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1179163
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1151384
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1145535
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1145527
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1141491
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1140714
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1140511
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=943983
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=943961

    46 % of my validations were rejected. It happend with different OSes, mainboards, chipsets, CPUs and core amounts. It´s just random and annoying as hell.

    @youngpro: Great results! Did you test how much you can gain from subzero temps? I figured out a DDR3-2200+ DC validation @ air is done easily within a few minutes, so I´m curious what to expect by changing to subzero. Would have tried that weeks ago, but lost confidence about non-rejected results...
    Fair enough, but in my experience all validations with disabled cores were rejected. When I went four cores it was finally accepted.
    Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
    Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!


    Quote Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides View Post
    Intel is about to get athlon'd
    Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 07-26-2010, 02:58 PM #6
    youngpro
    youngpro is offline
    PIfection
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    989
    Quote Originally Posted by Hyperhorn View Post
    @youngpro: Great results! Did you test how much you can gain from subzero temps? I figured out a DDR3-2200+ DC validation @ air is done easily within a few minutes, so I´m curious what to expect by changing to subzero. Would have tried that weeks ago, but lost confidence about non-rejected results...
    well in terms of max validation, i top out on air at 1108 and scale to 1180~ with LN2

    for CPU (this is to respond to thomas question also about gains from making IMC cold) not much, maybe 50MHz, but I did not want it to be a problem... before I put memory under LN2 I had no idea if IMC would be a bottleneck, so safer for me to put it under SS than to run it on air..

    that being said I still don't know if its a bottleneck and thats something I want to know, so I will be trying to CPU at LN2, maybe -100 instead of -45~ of SS and seeing what impact that has on memory clocking..
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 07-26-2010, 04:28 PM #7
    chew*
    chew* is offline
    Brilliant Idiot
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Hell on Earth
    Posts
    11,015
    to answer a question partially. In the particular board he is using the IMC of CPU will scle till -80 ish....after that at least on asus you will take a huge IMC hit or at least with elpida IC's. 2160 ram is cake on air, drop below -80 on cpu and wall at 2000 ram basically boot on stock cooler than freeze and same settings fail.

    1800 is not the limit of good elpida 6-6-6. thats the limit of bad elpida. good does 1900 6-6-6....even 2000 but not 32m stable.
    Last edited by chew*; 07-26-2010 at 04:38 PM.
    heatware chew*
    I've got no strings to hold me down.
    To make me fret, or make me frown.
    I had strings but now I'm free.
    There are no strings on me
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 07-26-2010, 05:07 PM #8
    BeepBeep2
    BeepBeep2 is offline
    Xtreme 3D Team
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    8,499
    Quote Originally Posted by chew* View Post
    to answer a question partially. In the particular board he is using the IMC of CPU will scle till -80 ish....after that at least on asus you will take a huge IMC hit or at least with elpida IC's. 2160 ram is cake on air, drop below -80 on cpu and wall at 2000 ram basically boot on stock cooler than freeze and same settings fail.

    1800 is not the limit of good elpida 6-6-6. thats the limit of bad elpida. good does 1900 6-6-6....even 2000 but not 32m stable.
    I sorta meant 24/7...nevermind

    I've seen a lot of kits of Hyper that fail to do 1800 6-6-6 at reasonable volts...the majority so far. Corsair 1600 C6 kits, Corsair 2000 C8 kits, my kit...I mean, sure GTX2 is nice but...

    I don't know.
    Smile
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules