MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 61

Thread: GSKILL FLARE achieves highest AMD ram frequency

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Aussie God
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Posts
    4,596
    Nice clocks on AMD young one!

    I personally got rid of all AMD stuff, and wont turn back before they make decent products for ram again..

    Seems they've just past CLARKDALE IMC.... Still not up at bloomfield level, nor Lynnfiled, Gulftown.
    Competition ranking;
    2005; Netbyte, Karise/Denmark #1 @ PiFast
    2008; AOCM II, Minfeld/Germany #2 @ 01SE/AM3/8M (w. Oliver)
    2009; AMD-OC, Viborg/Denmark #2 @ max freq Gigabyte TweaKING, Paris/France #4 @ 32M/01SE (w. Vanovich)
    2010: Gigabyte P55, Hamburg/Germany #6 @ wprime 1024/SPI 1M (w. THC) AOCM III, Minfeld/Germany #6 @ 01SE/AM3/1M/8M (w. NeoForce)

    Spectating;
    2010; GOOC 2010 Many thanks to Gigabyte!


  2. #2
    Xtreme 3D Team
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    8,499
    Quote Originally Posted by M.Beier View Post
    Nice clocks on AMD young one!

    I personally got rid of all AMD stuff, and wont turn back before they make decent products for ram again..

    Seems they've just past CLARKDALE IMC.... Still not up at bloomfield level, nor Lynnfiled, Gulftown.
    I dont understand, what's wrong with 1800 CAS 6?
    Smile

  3. #3
    Aussie God
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Posts
    4,596
    Quote Originally Posted by BeepBeep2 View Post
    I dont understand, what's wrong with 1800 CAS 6?
    That 2300-2400 CAS 6 is possible on Intel
    Competition ranking;
    2005; Netbyte, Karise/Denmark #1 @ PiFast
    2008; AOCM II, Minfeld/Germany #2 @ 01SE/AM3/8M (w. Oliver)
    2009; AMD-OC, Viborg/Denmark #2 @ max freq Gigabyte TweaKING, Paris/France #4 @ 32M/01SE (w. Vanovich)
    2010: Gigabyte P55, Hamburg/Germany #6 @ wprime 1024/SPI 1M (w. THC) AOCM III, Minfeld/Germany #6 @ 01SE/AM3/1M/8M (w. NeoForce)

    Spectating;
    2010; GOOC 2010 Many thanks to Gigabyte!


  4. #4
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    4,714
    Quote Originally Posted by M.Beier View Post
    That 2300-2400 CAS 6 is possible on Intel
    Who cares if the uncore is not capable of using that bandwidth?
    Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens.

  5. #5
    Aussie God
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Posts
    4,596
    Quote Originally Posted by massman View Post
    Who cares if the uncore is not capable of using that bandwidth?
    You are right, but was simply a reply if 1800 C8 is bad, and fact is Intel has the stronger memory handling at the moment, I dont think anyone questions that

    Uncore is locked on Lynnfield, so taking it being the i5-750, you have 16x multi for uncore, 5 multi for ram..... 2300 = 230bclk, 2400 = 240bclk.... That means; 230x16 = 3680mhz v 240x16 = 3840mhz, which for dual channel actually is alot for bandwidth, actually not that significant loss my friend.
    Competition ranking;
    2005; Netbyte, Karise/Denmark #1 @ PiFast
    2008; AOCM II, Minfeld/Germany #2 @ 01SE/AM3/8M (w. Oliver)
    2009; AMD-OC, Viborg/Denmark #2 @ max freq Gigabyte TweaKING, Paris/France #4 @ 32M/01SE (w. Vanovich)
    2010: Gigabyte P55, Hamburg/Germany #6 @ wprime 1024/SPI 1M (w. THC) AOCM III, Minfeld/Germany #6 @ 01SE/AM3/1M/8M (w. NeoForce)

    Spectating;
    2010; GOOC 2010 Many thanks to Gigabyte!


  6. #6
    Xtreme 3D Team
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    8,499
    Quote Originally Posted by M.Beier View Post
    You are right, but was simply a reply if 1800 C8 is bad, and fact is Intel has the stronger memory handling at the moment, I dont think anyone questions that

    Uncore is locked on Lynnfield, so taking it being the i5-750, you have 16x multi for uncore, 5 multi for ram..... 2300 = 230bclk, 2400 = 240bclk.... That means; 230x16 = 3680mhz v 240x16 = 3840mhz, which for dual channel actually is alot for bandwidth, actually not that significant loss my friend.
    I definately said 1800 C6 (as in 6-6-6), which is pretty much the limit of good Elpida Hyper.

    As for CAS 7, CAS 8, especially CAS 7-9-7 on amd @ 2000?...gskill flare is nothing. Just a name. It's PSC. boo hoo, you can get that way cheaper than the 2000 7-9-7 kit.
    Smile

  7. #7
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    4,714
    Quote Originally Posted by BeepBeep2 View Post
    As for CAS 7, CAS 8, especially CAS 7-9-7 on amd @ 2000?...gskill flare is nothing. Just a name. It's PSC. boo hoo, you can get that way cheaper than the 2000 7-9-7 kit.
    Don't know.

    I just ran a couple of scaling results checking the influence of freq, tcl and trcd on the everest read bandwidth (theoretical max difference) and it learned me that the relative importance of the three variables are:

    trcd = 1
    tcl = 9,1
    mhz = 22,5

    Of course, at a certain point, the IMC will bottleneck the memory freq.
    Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens.

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    shanghai, pr china
    Posts
    61
    Quote Originally Posted by BeepBeep2 View Post
    I definately said 1800 C6 (as in 6-6-6), which is pretty much the limit of good Elpida Hyper.
    The STT Speed 6GB 2000C7 kit I got is 1.71v 1800 666 spi 32m and 1800 666 stable, which embrassed me a lot:
    the "best" Hyper kit I have does 1.71v 1860 666 spi 32m but only 1760 666 stable.

    Quote Originally Posted by chew* View Post
    I have non GTX2 kits that do 1800 fine in fact all my sets do 1800 fine.

    It's 1900+ that only 3 sets can do on ambient others scale to that speed cold fine.
    Do you mean full stablity (e.g. LinX and Hyper PI) or spi 32m?
    How much voltage did you push on ambient?
    i7 920/950/w3565 @ ek hf
    R3E @ bios 0602/0704
    bbse gs 2133ps/hyper pdp2kc8 stt2kc8 stt2kc7 stt2.2kc8
    zotec gtx480 @ stock @ pcie x8
    x-fi elite pro @ pci
    areca arc-1300-4e eSATAx4 controller @ pcie x1(x8)
    hd*N @ ahci
    corsair hx850w
    cosmos rc-1000 case
    windows xp pro 32-bit sp3/windows 7 ult 64-bit

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •