Nice clocks on AMD young one!
I personally got rid of all AMD stuff, and wont turn back before they make decent products for ram again..
Seems they've just past CLARKDALE IMC.... Still not up at bloomfield level, nor Lynnfiled, Gulftown.
Nice clocks on AMD young one!
I personally got rid of all AMD stuff, and wont turn back before they make decent products for ram again..
Seems they've just past CLARKDALE IMC.... Still not up at bloomfield level, nor Lynnfiled, Gulftown.
Competition ranking;
2005; Netbyte, Karise/Denmark #1 @ PiFast
2008; AOCM II, Minfeld/Germany #2 @ 01SE/AM3/8M (w. Oliver)
2009; AMD-OC, Viborg/Denmark #2 @ max freq Gigabyte TweaKING, Paris/France #4 @ 32M/01SE (w. Vanovich)
2010: Gigabyte P55, Hamburg/Germany #6 @ wprime 1024/SPI 1M (w. THC) AOCM III, Minfeld/Germany #6 @ 01SE/AM3/1M/8M (w. NeoForce)
Spectating;
2010; GOOC 2010 Many thanks to Gigabyte!
Competition ranking;
2005; Netbyte, Karise/Denmark #1 @ PiFast
2008; AOCM II, Minfeld/Germany #2 @ 01SE/AM3/8M (w. Oliver)
2009; AMD-OC, Viborg/Denmark #2 @ max freq Gigabyte TweaKING, Paris/France #4 @ 32M/01SE (w. Vanovich)
2010: Gigabyte P55, Hamburg/Germany #6 @ wprime 1024/SPI 1M (w. THC) AOCM III, Minfeld/Germany #6 @ 01SE/AM3/1M/8M (w. NeoForce)
Spectating;
2010; GOOC 2010 Many thanks to Gigabyte!
You are right, but was simply a reply if 1800 C8 is bad, and fact is Intel has the stronger memory handling at the moment, I dont think anyone questions that
Uncore is locked on Lynnfield, so taking it being the i5-750, you have 16x multi for uncore, 5 multi for ram..... 2300 = 230bclk, 2400 = 240bclk.... That means; 230x16 = 3680mhz v 240x16 = 3840mhz, which for dual channel actually is alot for bandwidth, actually not that significant loss my friend.
Competition ranking;
2005; Netbyte, Karise/Denmark #1 @ PiFast
2008; AOCM II, Minfeld/Germany #2 @ 01SE/AM3/8M (w. Oliver)
2009; AMD-OC, Viborg/Denmark #2 @ max freq Gigabyte TweaKING, Paris/France #4 @ 32M/01SE (w. Vanovich)
2010: Gigabyte P55, Hamburg/Germany #6 @ wprime 1024/SPI 1M (w. THC) AOCM III, Minfeld/Germany #6 @ 01SE/AM3/1M/8M (w. NeoForce)
Spectating;
2010; GOOC 2010 Many thanks to Gigabyte!
Don't know.
I just ran a couple of scaling results checking the influence of freq, tcl and trcd on the everest read bandwidth (theoretical max difference) and it learned me that the relative importance of the three variables are:
trcd = 1
tcl = 9,1
mhz = 22,5
Of course, at a certain point, the IMC will bottleneck the memory freq.
Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens.
The STT Speed 6GB 2000C7 kit I got is 1.71v 1800 666 spi 32m and 1800 666 stable, which embrassed me a lot
:
the "best" Hyper kit I have does 1.71v 1860 666 spi 32m but only 1760 666 stable.
Do you mean full stablity (e.g. LinX and Hyper PI) or spi 32m?
How much voltage did you push on ambient?
i7 920/950/w3565 @ ek hf
R3E @ bios 0602/0704
bbse gs 2133ps/hyper pdp2kc8 stt2kc8 stt2kc7 stt2.2kc8
zotec gtx480 @ stock @ pcie x8
x-fi elite pro @ pci
areca arc-1300-4e eSATAx4 controller @ pcie x1(x8)
hd*N @ ahci
corsair hx850w
cosmos rc-1000 case
windows xp pro 32-bit sp3/windows 7 ult 64-bit
Bookmarks