Page 2 of 14 FirstFirst 1234512 ... LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 344

Thread: Intel plans to deliberately limit Sandy Bridge overclocking

  1. #26
    ODOC
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Copenhagen - Denmark
    Posts
    2,189
    Exactly, You get what you pay for.

    futhermore is X68 the real platform for extreme pushing.

    Sure OC on P67 as said etc. with right BINs CPUs.

    Very nice move imo from Intel.

    LGA1156 is like atm. imo in the middle. price / features. Its cool to see that it assumingly will be cheaper to build a LGA1155 rig and when its time to beg up you push your X68.

  2. #27
    Devil kept pokin'
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    South Kakalaky
    Posts
    1,299
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    this is bs... intel didnt do this deliberatly, and they didnt do it to make more money either...
    ya sure ok companies arent concerned in the least about making money

  3. #28
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    23
    We need someone..

    Who?

  4. #29
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    SF
    Posts
    1,070
    Quote Originally Posted by memmem View Post
    We need someone..

    Who?
    It took this long for your first post?

  5. #30
    all outta gum
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    3,390

    I think it says here that it will allow for even greater bus overclocks than with BCLK, but only on the high end/extreme platform.
    www.teampclab.pl
    MOA 2009 Poland #2, AMD Black Ops 2010, MOA 2011 Poland #1, MOA 2011 EMEA #12

    Test bench: empty

  6. #31
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    SF
    Posts
    1,070
    The top right of that slide says "SNB-E Non-XE = TDP+0 bins (no overclocking)"

  7. #32
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,192
    Sounds to me they made it so that the lower end cheaper systems can be cheaper over all.
    Quote Originally Posted by alacheesu View Post
    If you were consistently able to put two pieces of lego together when you were a kid, you should have no trouble replacing the pump top.

  8. #33
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    1,261
    after sandybridge released, i hope more activity on amd forum section

    intel is too greedy, they got money recently from selling .. still not enough need more!
    Vishera 8320@ 5ghz | Gigabyte UD3 | 8gb TridentX 2400 c10| Powercolor 6850 | Thermalight Silver Arrow (bench Super KAZE 3k) | Samsung 830 128gbx2 Raid 0| Fractal case

  9. #34
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    425
    this has been a rumor before i7 launch too, "because of the turbo boost OC won't be possible"... i don't see why intel would do that, it makes no sense.
    and please don't say RMA, rma for OC is certainly marginal.
    Core i7 2700k@4,8ghz HT off- 1.41v / Gainward GTX580 GooD 850/1700/2200 / 2X4Gb G.Skill Ares 1833C9 / Z77 Sabertooth / Crucial M4 64 Gb / WD 320Gb and 640GB / Corsair H80 / Corsair 620 HX

  10. #35
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Quote Originally Posted by herderien View Post
    this has been a rumor before i7 launch too, "because of the turbo boost OC won't be possible"... i don't see why intel would do that, it makes no sense.
    and please don't say RMA, rma for OC is certainly marginal.
    But there is a difference now due to the way DMI is designed.This wasn't the case in the i7s.

  11. #36
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    1,264
    Quote Originally Posted by richierich View Post
    The top right of that slide says "SNB-E Non-XE = TDP+0 bins (no overclocking)"
    Refers to the multiplier though, nothing to do with supposed bclk restriction

  12. #37
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    425
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    But there is a difference now due to the way DMI is designed.This wasn't the case in the i7s.
    possible, but you cannot be sure just by looking at specs on a powerpoint.
    or they will develop the "K" concept or whatever they need to make OC affordable.

    average overclockers are just too much of free publicity for them to let it go like that

    Quote Originally Posted by Sam_oslo View Post

    It is a natural move if Intel try yo to limit the OC of mainstream to prevent a direct competition with hight end. I guess that's the lesson Intel has learned from i7, when we all bought a sub $300 920 and OCed it to beat the $1000 975.
    you mean it took 20 years for them to realize that ? this has been existing since 486 series ^^
    Core i7 2700k@4,8ghz HT off- 1.41v / Gainward GTX580 GooD 850/1700/2200 / 2X4Gb G.Skill Ares 1833C9 / Z77 Sabertooth / Crucial M4 64 Gb / WD 320Gb and 640GB / Corsair H80 / Corsair 620 HX

  13. #38
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    1,886
    intel will surely milk those stupid fully unlocked cheapo sandy bridge ... FAIL!!!!
    WILL CUDDLE FOR FOOD

    Quote Originally Posted by JF-AMD View Post
    Dual proc client systems are like sex in high school. Everyone talks about it but nobody is really doing it.

  14. #39
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    380
    and this is why monopolies are bad.. i just wish AMD got its act together

  15. #40
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the Land down -under-
    Posts
    4,452
    Quote Originally Posted by 3NZ0 View Post
    Wait, what?
    lol my bad i found out yesterday only just realised what i said haha

    Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?

  16. #41
    I am Xtreme Ket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    6,822
    I don't see this happening. All that will result is intel shooting themselves in the foot and many jumping ship to AMD. Pure panic rumors, salt truck is to your right.

    "Prowler"
    X570 Tomahawk | R7 3700X | 2x16GB Klevv BoltX @ 3600MHz CL18 | Powercolor 6800XT Red Devil | Xonar DX 7.1 | 2TB Barracuda | 256GB & 512GB Asgard NVMe drives | 2x DVD & Blu-Ray opticals | EVGA Supernova 1000w G2

    Cooling:

    6x 140mm LED fans, 1x 200mm LED fan | Modified CoolerMaster Masterliquid 240

    Asrock Z77 thread! | Asrock Z77 Extreme6 Review | Asrock P67 Extreme4 Review | Asrock P67 Extreme4/6 Pro3 thread | Asrock Z68 Extreme4 thread | Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Review | Asrock Z68 Gen3 Thread | 8GB G-Skill review | TK 2.ZERO homepage | P5Q series mBIOS thread
    Modded X570 Aorus UEFIs

  17. #42
    Xtreme Addict Chrono Detector's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,142
    WTF Intel... I guess they didn't like how people got a lower clocked CPU and overclocked it to higher speeds for free. But seriously, by doing this that may lose customers. The whole 1155 platform sounds disappointing anyway, so I'm going to skip it and focus on AMD Bulldozer and Intel 2011, or whatever they are going to call it.
    AMD Threadripper 12 core 1920x CPU OC at 4Ghz | ASUS ROG Zenith Extreme X399 motherboard | 32GB G.Skill Trident RGB 3200Mhz DDR4 RAM | Gigabyte 11GB GTX 1080 Ti Aorus Xtreme GPU | SilverStone Strider Platinum 1000W Power Supply | Crucial 1050GB MX300 SSD | 4TB Western Digital HDD | 60" Samsung JU7000 4K UHD TV at 3840x2160

  18. #43
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Quote Originally Posted by Ket View Post
    I don't see this happening. All that will result is intel shooting themselves in the foot and many jumping ship to AMD. Pure panic rumors, salt truck is to your right.
    How about reading the thread and looking at the intel official slides from last IDF? It's all there.

  19. #44
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the Land down -under-
    Posts
    4,452
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    But there is a difference now due to the way DMI is designed.This wasn't the case in the i7s.
    Yeh but we had Blck in i7 which is similar to the front side bus "fsb" now we have DMI which is similar to blck, so who knows?

    Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?

  20. #45
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Quote Originally Posted by Johnny87au View Post
    Yeh but we had Blck in i7 which is similar to the front side bus "fsb" now we have DMI which is similar to blck, so who knows?
    Look at the presentation slides from IDF.It's limitation of the design.Without the unlocked multi DMI clock doesn't scale past 3-5% from default 100Mhz.It's just the way the thing is designed.

  21. #46
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the Land down -under-
    Posts
    4,452
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    Look at the presentation slides from IDF.It's limitation of the design.Without the unlocked multi DMI clock doesn't scale past 3-5% from default 100Mhz.It's just the way the thing is designed.
    What im saying is though, They arent released yet and from what ive read its only the 1155 platform so no real biggy, no loss..

    Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?

  22. #47
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    Quote Originally Posted by Johnny87au View Post
    Yeh but we had Blck in i7 which is similar to the front side bus "fsb" now we have DMI which is similar to blck, so who knows?
    You still have a reference clock aka base clock and from this clock all other clock domains are sprung off. The difference is, that for mainstream SB you have locked DMI and PCIE multiplicators. So if you increase reference clock you also increase both of this clocks.

  23. #48
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    840
    I won't say I'm surprised. Intel receives alot of CPUs from people that think they are "leet overclockers". Then they burn up their chip because they don't know what they're doing and then RMA it claiming a faulty CPU. It's difficult to identify what CPUs were overclocked/overvolted and which ones weren't unless there is physical damage.

    Frankly, I'd prefer the CPU having some feature that records the highest clock/voltage the CPU has ever been exposed to and Intel looking at that before replacing a CPU. If you overclocked the out of it, your warranty will not be honored. Instead they're going to limit the speed for everyone. No fun!

  24. #49
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    23
    Quote Originally Posted by richierich View Post
    It took this long for your first post?
    Thank you.

    For a long time I follow the forum very closely because i really like computers

    But i donīt have the knowledge to post frequently (or ever ) because I am only a civil engineer.

  25. #50
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the Land down -under-
    Posts
    4,452
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornet331 View Post
    You still have a reference clock aka base clock and from this clock all other clock domains are sprung off. The difference is, that for mainstream SB you have locked DMI and PCIE multiplicators. So if you increase reference clock you also increase both of this clocks.
    Yeh i read that increasing it by 5mhz only causes the PCIE and system to freeze, sounds crap eh

    Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?

Page 2 of 14 FirstFirst 1234512 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •