:hello:
i'm testing my ddr 500 A-data today, I put multiplier 4 and then i began to increase fsb.. i reach 342 at the moment but latency isn't that good i think.. (52 ns)..
I put 2.9v . no vddr mod at the moment.
my system : shuttle an50r
a64 3200+
2x256 ddr 500 A-data
what multiplier is the best in order to have best performance?
is 340 normal..? i heard that multiplier .5 aren't that good.. i didnt test that much under .5 multiplier..
Last edited by eviLRuLeZ; 05-16-2004 at 02:59 AM.
its not actually running 340fsb... its a glitch with the 4x and .5 multipliers
ok
how can i reach a high fsb then? with which multiplier?
Since 5 is the lowest ram-divider, your ram is running @ 273Mhz
(342/5) * 4 = 273
To run 1:1 you need to run 5 or above, and no half multis.
ok i'm going to test with multiplier above 5 and no half multis too
i'll post screenshots here
thx Formann
they have to fix that bug.Bt 273 is still good.
Abit KN9-SLI
X2 3800+
1gb corsair pc5400
2 evga 7900gt
200gb maxtor sata
ocz 520w
heatware:althes
ebay althes
thats average for hynix chips, nice board though it seems, and nice cpu.
bios is last, 26
i hope i'll reach more than 273 tonight
finally tested my mem..
Last edited by eviLRuLeZ; 05-16-2004 at 02:52 AM.
Try to test the memory in Sisoftsandra.
it reached something like 295 now under sandra
Nice !!
Shuttle SN95G5 V2
AMD Athlon64 3000+ Winchester @ 2430MHz, 1.47vcore
Club3D X800Pro 256MB
1GB Kingston Value PC3200 @ 221MHz, 3-3-8-3, 2.7v
200GB Maxtor DiamondMax 10
NEC 3500A DVD±RW
Acer AL1715 17" TFT
nice... great results.
Nice scores.. And nice sticks. How much voltage are you feeding´em ?
2.9v only
i need to do vddr mod in order to see if they can reach a better frequency
300 shud be np with a little more volts
tried lowering the timings a little? ..
Intel i7 930 @ 4.2Ghz 24/7
Asus Rampage 3 Extreme
Asus Radeon HD 6990
Corsair Dominator GT 6GB
Corsair AX1200, 600T
Intel X25-M 160GB
Dell U3011 30" Monitor
If you are after performance then lowering the timings would incerase ever so slightly.
would be interesting to know if these chips could run
better timings lets say
230 fsb 1:1 - 2-3-3-6 or 2-3-2-6
ok i'm going to test better timings
i have run 2.5 4 3 5 but its stable only under 255 mhz though.
i tested 3 4 4 5 too. stable around 270,280 but no more.
Nice clocks and buffered
How is the 'real world speed' at those timings ?
aka unbuffered Sandra mem
im curious about this aswell, especially 2-3-2-6Originally posted by thomas66
would be interesting to know if these chips could run
better timings lets say
230 fsb 1:1 - 2-3-3-6 or 2-3-2-6
can you see the light? is it shining too bright? can you see the light at the end of the tunnel, i know i do, i know its true.
hynix can run cas2? 300mhz is nice, most hynic sticks crap out at 280
it doesnt even boot with cas 2
macci, where can I find this screen setup in sandra?
i reached 297 on sandra, i try to reach 300 @2.9 but its getting hard :/
is it running hot? ramsinks could give you a nice 5mhz boost.
right click on memory bandwidth benchmark and then click on module options :thumbsup:Originally posted by eviLRuLeZ
where can I find this screen setup in sandra?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks