Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 151

Thread: Sandy Bridge: Preliminary Clocks Revealed?

  1. #76
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the Land down -under-
    Posts
    4,452
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    i heard its more than 8 and i dont think itll be 12, so...
    jesus christ, 10 core yet their still bringing out the 990x..

    Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?

  2. #77
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    what, im calling him rude, whats wrong with that? i didnt mean it as an insult and i dont think he saw it as one...
    hornet?
    what insult... :p

    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    compare the highest scores of 1156 and 1366... there is a pretty huge gap, not just 5% or 10%...
    only if you compare it to the 980x, but this baby plays in its own league. All the 45nm nehalems are quite in line on cpu bound benchmarks, when you start looking at vantage the table turn, thx to more pci-e lanes for SLi/CF.


    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    no, i agree, you were right, the ipc at stock clocks is about the same for 1156 and 1366... what i meant is that you seem to really enjoy pointing out that i was wrong
    Look at the benchmarks i provided, there you have a i7 9xx and a i7 8xx clocked @ 4ghz and the perform tha same. It doesn't matter what what clock they run, stock or overclocked. If IPC is the same you performance is determined by max achivable clockrate and there S1336 has the edge compared to S1156.

    And no im no enjoying it to correct someone who is wrong...actually its a pain in the ass, cause I have to find data and I am a lazy fella...

  3. #78
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    4,308
    Can't decide, search for a better i7-860 CPU (atm running 4.0GHz 1.392v / 1.36v load HT off cuz of summer temp probs, max 77C at this config) or just wait til SB arrives and upgrade? Money isn't a problem atm so I don't care if I wouldn't gain that much. Would be nice to know how well SB overclocks. ^^

    I'm not interested in the 8(+) core versions myself, I can't seem myself be in need of more than 4 cores for quite a while.
    Last edited by RPGWiZaRD; 07-15-2010 at 07:08 AM.
    Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs

    If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place

  4. #79
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,638
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    i heard its more than 8 and i dont think itll be 12, so...
    Bring on the cores!

    But really, how does Intel plan to fit 10 cores on a desktop (non EX) socket without a 22nm 'tock'? 6 Westmere cores already span 32nm, SB will be 32nm for a while until they shrink down to 22nm.

    Are SB cores smaller or arranged differently?
    XTREMESupercomputer: Phase 2
    Live up to your name - November 1 - 8
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team

  5. #80
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    580
    Quote Originally Posted by trn View Post
    Bring on the cores!

    But really, how does Intel plan to fit 10 cores on a desktop (non EX) socket without a 22nm 'tock'? 6 Westmere cores already span 32nm, SB will be 32nm for a while until they shrink down to 22nm.

    Are SB cores smaller or arranged differently?
    yeah, nehalem cores measure 24mm˛, while SB cores shall be more like ~20mm˛

    the desktop SB quad-core + IGP will end up with 65w TDP

    an octo-core and even a 10-core processor without the graphics part is totally possible...

  6. #81
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the Land down -under-
    Posts
    4,452
    Quote Originally Posted by -Sweeper_ View Post
    yeah, nehalem cores measure 24mm˛, while SB cores shall be more like ~20mm˛

    the desktop SB quad-core + IGP will end up with 65w TDP

    an octo-core and even a 10-core processor without the graphics part is totally possible...
    Definately low end cpu's if thats the case

    Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?

  7. #82
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the Land down -under-
    Posts
    4,452
    Only changes from i7 to sandybridge are listed below..
    Sandy Bridge DT (LGA 1155) will be a direct replacement for Core i5/i7 LGA 1156, but I doubt whether the owner of the latter would bother too much with the upgrade since the only notable differences are :
    (1) a few new instruction sets, the most notable being AVX, that will still require software to be written to take advantage of them-probably around the two-year timeframe for AVX usage to become anything more than a novelty
    (2) native SATA 6Gb support, as opposed to a third party onboard controller chip.
    (3) Upgraded DMI (4 lanes PCI-E v2.0 for "Southbridge" duties)
    The new chipset retains the dual channel DDR3-1333 (official support) and sixteen lanes of PCI-E 2.0 that the P55 enjoys.
    So, LGA 1366/X58 will remain the enthusiast setup of choice* until Sandy Bridge B2 (LGA 2011) launches in late 2011.

    * Depending upon whether Bulldozer mounts any worthwhile challenge, assuming it launches before LGA 2011....not a given at this stage.


    Would really love to see how their native 6gb support scales to the gimmicky current third party onboard controllers?

    Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?

  8. #83
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    580
    Quote Originally Posted by Johnny87au View Post
    So, LGA 1366/X58 will remain the enthusiast setup of choice* until Sandy Bridge B2 (LGA 2011) launches in late 2011.
    Q3, not late 2011.

  9. #84
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    whats bull*hit? What i know, EX Sandy Bridge for highend s1355 and 8c/16t, not more
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  10. #85
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    China
    Posts
    69
    Quote Originally Posted by FlanK3r View Post
    whats bull*hit? What i know, EX Sandy Bridge for highend s1355 and 8c/16t, not more
    No, you are completely wrong, Johnny87au is right. Next enthusiast platform will be LGA 2011, till will be High-end X58+Core i7

  11. #86
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    I thought 2011 is only for server segment...? (s1155 mainstream and lower highend, s1355 new highend, 2011 server). 2011 pins will too crazy and big chip (how large L3 cache than?)
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  12. #87
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    China
    Posts
    69
    yet it will be huge chip, but quad-channel, new logics, 8+ cores, 32 pci-e bridge needs more pins and bigger silicon then 1366 now.

  13. #88
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    Quote Originally Posted by Zed_X View Post
    yet it will be huge chip, but quad-channel, new logics, 8+ cores, 32 pci-e bridge needs more pins and bigger silicon then 1366 now.
    Your talking about Sand Bridge EX aka replacement for nehalem EX... thats no enthuisast platform but rather a replacement for 4P+ server.

  14. #89
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    China
    Posts
    69
    he asked for EX

  15. #90
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    Quote Originally Posted by Zed_X View Post
    he asked for EX
    Ehhh.. not really S1336 will be replaced by Socket S1356 , Wikipedia is wrong in this regard, since it makes no sense to have such a huge socket for normal uniprocessor server and highend desktop.

    S1156-> S1155
    S1336-> S1356
    S1567-> S2011

    Three segements three sockets.

    Why should intel suddenly change a scheme that worked for the last decade.

  16. #91
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the Land down -under-
    Posts
    4,452
    hornet i strongly disagree with you here, I highly doubt the 1366's >1356.. 1356 is the new sandybridge socket which will be high end , say 6/8/10 cores.. not sure but im assuming 6-8 cores..

    Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?

  17. #92
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Bangkok,Thailand (DamHot)
    Posts
    2,693
    i assume 1356 same size heatsink hole as 1366????


    would 1356 still tripple ch. ddr3 or it would go to quad ch. ddr3????
    Intel Core i5 6600K + ASRock Z170 OC Formula + Galax HOF 4000 (8GBx2) + Antec 1200W OC Version
    EK SupremeHF + BlackIce GTX360 + Swiftech 655 + XSPC ResTop
    Macbook Pro 15" Late 2011 (i7 2760QM + HD 6770M)
    Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) , Huawei Nexus 6P
    [history system]80286 80386 80486 Cyrix K5 Pentium133 Pentium II Duron1G Athlon1G E2180 E3300 E5300 E7200 E8200 E8400 E8500 E8600 Q9550 QX6800 X3-720BE i7-920 i3-530 i5-750 Semp140@x2 955BE X4-B55 Q6600 i5-2500K i7-2600K X4-B60 X6-1055T FX-8120 i7-4790K

  18. #93
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the Land down -under-
    Posts
    4,452
    Quote Originally Posted by PatRaceTin View Post
    i assume 1356 same size heatsink hole as 1366????


    would 1356 still tripple ch. ddr3 or it would go to quad ch. ddr3????
    Not sure mate, definately gonna be 8core/12threads though.. Cant wait

    Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?

  19. #94
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    what about L3 size chache for LG1356 ?
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  20. #95
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Bulgaria, Varna
    Posts
    447


    LGA1356 will probably harbor salvage parts from the full-scale LGA2011 (quad channel) Sandy Bridge processors.
    Last edited by fellix_bg; 07-16-2010 at 10:42 PM.

  21. #96
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    Quote Originally Posted by Johnny87au View Post
    hornet i strongly disagree with you here, I highly doubt the 1366's >1356.. 1356 is the new sandybridge socket which will be high end , say 6/8/10 cores.. not sure but im assuming 6-8 cores..
    Uhhh... we where talking about the new enthusiast platform.. and if you belive intel makes the new MP platform the new enthusiast platform then you couldn't be more wrong. Mother board prices would be insane due to strict desgin requirements, ocing will be next to impossible...

    The rumored S1356 has the same target field as the current S1336 -> Singel or Dual socket boards for highend desktop and workstations/lowend servers.

    S2011 is the MP platform for 4 Socket+ with the chance for some 2S boards.

    It makes no sense that intel extends MP platform down to singel socket workstations...

  22. #97
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the Land down -under-
    Posts
    4,452
    Im not exactly sure what you mean by MP platform... As far as my knowledge lets me go i know their is alot of changes which in no way targets the same idea of the 1336.. As for expensive mobo's yes unfortunately people will have to upgrade mobo's but CPU's will be fine..

    Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?

  23. #98
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    Quote Originally Posted by Johnny87au View Post
    Im not exactly sure what you mean by MP platform... As far as my knowledge lets me go i know their is alot of changes which in no way targets the same idea of the 1336.. As for expensive mobo's yes unfortunately people will have to upgrade mobo's but CPU's will be fine..
    MP = Multi Processor -> 4sockets+
    DP = Dual Processor -> 2 sockets
    UP =Uni Processor -> one socket

    You should know this when you talk about this kind of stuff, since is basic knowledge.

    Hell, Intel even uses this as there official nomenclature for there cpus...

    Enthusiasts wont get S2011 cause its the MP platform aka Sandybridge EX, why do you want stuff like hardware RAS and other reliability related features that come with a hefty price tag for consumers...

  24. #99
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    i cant understand chinese lang., but here is some new video about SB
    Sandybridge OC?
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  25. #100
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    263
    Quote Originally Posted by FlanK3r View Post
    i cant understand chinese lang., but here is some new video about SB
    Sandybridge OC?
    Thanks for the link. Here are some slides from the video...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	sandy1.jpg 
Views:	680 
Size:	70.1 KB 
ID:	106198   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	sandy2.jpg 
Views:	668 
Size:	69.2 KB 
ID:	106199   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	sandy3.jpg 
Views:	686 
Size:	58.2 KB 
ID:	106200   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	sandy4.jpg 
Views:	672 
Size:	67.7 KB 
ID:	106201  

Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •