user Catalyst 4.4
user Catalyst 4.4
Last edited by sxs112; 05-13-2004 at 09:48 PM.
Interesting.. you cannot find CAS 2 5-2-2 memory to test with this? Can you show detailed report of the 3DMark score?
i5 750 4.20GHz @ NH-D14 | 8GB | P7P55DLE | 8800U | Indilinx SSD + Samsung F3 | HAF922 + CM750W
Past: Q6600 @ 3.60 E6400 @ 3.60 | E6300 @ 3.40 | O165 @ 2.90 | X2 4400+ @ 2.80 | X2 3800+ @ 2.70 | VE 3200+ @ 2.80 | WI 3200+ @ 2.75 | WI 3000+ no IHS @ 2.72 | TBB 1700+ @ 2.60 | XP-M 2500+ @ 2.63 | NC 2800+ @ 2.40 | AB 1.60GHz @ 2.60Originally Posted by CompGeek
Because uses infineon memory Chip pellet therefore to be unable to make CAS 2 5-2-2Originally posted by IvanAndreevich
Interesting.. you cannot find CAS 2 5-2-2 memory to test with this? Can you show detailed report of the 3DMark score?
user Catalyst 4.5
Last edited by sxs112; 05-13-2004 at 10:07 PM.
This test is I is called him which I the friend tests not to emit the show detailed report me also not to have the means
Thermaltake Silent Tower CL-P0025
Mighty pimp looking, big copper coolers are fine as long as they don't make a racket. A big plus is also if they cool decently =)
Opteron 165
Dfi NF4 Expert
4x1 1GB twinmos PC 3200
XFX 7900GT 550/1500
tRCD and tRP at 3 cost a lot of marks, cas doesn't matter at all though. Your ram can't do tRCD/tRP "2", i take it?
no, but it might be the missing miliseconds to get a lower score...Originally posted by Soulburner
No, I don't think CL 2.5 vs 3.0 is worth 1 whole second, but someone can try to prove me wrong.
Interesting score, this is will show in the long run that 939 is alot faster than 940, and prescott.
Abit KN9-SLI
X2 3800+
1gb corsair pc5400
2 evga 7900gt
200gb maxtor sata
ocz 520w
heatware:althes
ebay althes
A fx53 (940) stock 1m is 34secs on a fresh formatted drive with memory set to auto in the bios.Originally posted by saaya
no, all new fx cpus will cost 733
yuri, you were running the 1m @ 2.5-3-3-8 , he was running the 1m @ 3-3-3-8, so his sys is probably a sec faster.
But at what timings? 2-2-2-5?Originally posted by yuri
A fx53 (940) stock 1m is 34secs on a fresh formatted drive with memory set to auto in the bios.
System
ASUS Z170-Pro
Skylake i7-6700K @ 4600 Mhz
MSI GTX 1070 Armor OC
32 GB G.Skill Ripjaws V
Samsung 850 EVO (2)
EVGA SuperNOVA 650 G2
Corsair Hydro H90
NZXT S340
All they say is cas 2Originally posted by Soulburner
But at what timings? 2-2-2-5?
amdzone
Probably 5-2-2-2 then..
i5 750 4.20GHz @ NH-D14 | 8GB | P7P55DLE | 8800U | Indilinx SSD + Samsung F3 | HAF922 + CM750W
Past: Q6600 @ 3.60 E6400 @ 3.60 | E6300 @ 3.40 | O165 @ 2.90 | X2 4400+ @ 2.80 | X2 3800+ @ 2.70 | VE 3200+ @ 2.80 | WI 3200+ @ 2.75 | WI 3000+ no IHS @ 2.72 | TBB 1700+ @ 2.60 | XP-M 2500+ @ 2.63 | NC 2800+ @ 2.40 | AB 1.60GHz @ 2.60
my guess is 2/3/2/6/11/16 because unless you vmodd the board tRCD is very hard to run @ 2Originally posted by IvanAndreevich
Probably 5-2-2-2 then..
isnt that 3dmark score kinda low, considering its got a s939 and a 9800pro?
i built a rig for my friend with an opteron (1.8ghz) and a 9800pro and it got 20k stock
Boyne7
That's kinda high..
i5 750 4.20GHz @ NH-D14 | 8GB | P7P55DLE | 8800U | Indilinx SSD + Samsung F3 | HAF922 + CM750W
Past: Q6600 @ 3.60 E6400 @ 3.60 | E6300 @ 3.40 | O165 @ 2.90 | X2 4400+ @ 2.80 | X2 3800+ @ 2.70 | VE 3200+ @ 2.80 | WI 3200+ @ 2.75 | WI 3000+ no IHS @ 2.72 | TBB 1700+ @ 2.60 | XP-M 2500+ @ 2.63 | NC 2800+ @ 2.40 | AB 1.60GHz @ 2.60
Initial screenshot for super pi (first post) shows a cpu-z package result of socket 939 yet the cpu-z package result for screenshot of super pi 1M (next posting) shows socket 940? What gives? Older version of cpu-z used straight after initial super pi result?
Last edited by OC Detective; 05-16-2004 at 11:18 PM.
Maybe with a 9800xt, a opteron 144 / 9800pro doesn't score 20k stockOriginally posted by Boyne7
isnt that 3dmark score kinda low, considering its got a s939 and a 9800pro?
i built a rig for my friend with an opteron (1.8ghz) and a 9800pro and it got 20k stock
Originally posted by sxs112
MB:K8T800Pro
Originally posted by sxs112
this CPU-Z is Old
1 pic has socket 939 and the other 940?! surely cpu-z wouldnt miss count the socket?!??!?!?!
CPU:Intel i5 750 @ 4200mhz 200x21 1.344v
Cooling: Corsair H50
Mobo:Gigabyte P55-US3L
Memory:4GB Corsair XMS3 9-9-9-24
GFX:ASUS HD5850 850/1200 1GB
Didn't they have a discount on Photoshop last week?
Just gotta wait till it's official to be certain. You can wait, right?
Personally, I doubt we will see any performance revelations from Socket939. Maybe 1-3%... still same core and same Mhz. The reason I'm waiting for it is: 1. Unlocked AGP/PCI and multiplier. 2. Doesn't need registered memory... can finally use pimping BH5 sticks 3. Hopefully really good overclocking because of 1&2.
PS: Does anybody have BH5 that can do 273 @ 2-2-2-5??
24/7: A64 3000+ (\_/) @2.4Ghz, 1.4V
1 GB OCZ Gold (='.'=) 240 2-2-2-5
Giga-byte NF3 (")_(") K8NSC-939
XFX 6800 16/6 NV5 @420/936, 1.33V
with enough volts.......BH-5 can go 270...like 3.6-3.8V.
C
lol agreedOriginally posted by ***Deimos***
Didn't they have a discount on Photoshop last week?
Just gotta wait till it's official to be certain. You can wait, right?
Personally, I doubt we will see any performance revelations from Socket939. Maybe 1-3%... still same core and same Mhz. The reason I'm waiting for it is: 1. Unlocked AGP/PCI and multiplier. 2. Doesn't need registered memory... can finally use pimping BH5 sticks 3. Hopefully really good overclocking because of 1&2.
PS: Does anybody have BH5 that can do 273 @ 2-2-2-5??
CPU:Intel i5 750 @ 4200mhz 200x21 1.344v
Cooling: Corsair H50
Mobo:Gigabyte P55-US3L
Memory:4GB Corsair XMS3 9-9-9-24
GFX:ASUS HD5850 850/1200 1GB
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks