so if i get it straight.. amd has 10x less $$$ for R&D ... has cores with 60% less die space yet they perform only 25% slower .... and people still think amd is a cheapo cpu maker??? LOLL drug is good in some part of the world
so if i get it straight.. amd has 10x less $$$ for R&D ... has cores with 60% less die space yet they perform only 25% slower .... and people still think amd is a cheapo cpu maker??? LOLL drug is good in some part of the world
WILL CUDDLE FOR FOOD
Originally Posted by JF-AMD
I don't know what to make of this post. So let's see, AMD doubles the size of their cores = double core performance? Stop grasping at straws. If VIA gets as much sympathy as AMD does, they may overtake AMD.
If you are so upset about people liking AMD, maybe you are in the wrong thread? Seriously, what are you trying to prove here?
Posting this in a thread that was created to talk about a new AMD chip is an attempt to turn the thread into a fanboy garbage dumping ground. Why not leave this kinda crap at the door? Is that too much to ask?
It may help to bring your sense of humor with you into a forum. As it stands you seem a little too tight, sensitive, and defensive about "AMD Threads." Relax dude, it's just hardware. I could quote you funnier stuff from 'Intel threads' from pro AMD posters.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks