can i hav ethe stepping added to mine?
CCBBE CB 1013CPMW green PCB
can i hav ethe stepping added to mine?
CCBBE CB 1013CPMW green PCB
Yep thats MSI for you at 72F.Originally Posted by crazydiamond
Clocks cpu alot higher at the cost of clock per clock performance.Single threaded to multi threaded speeds are a rather large gap.
Titan we have had this discussion before, assumption is the mother of all F ups.
Might want to check HW bot, I do own the fastest single core chip in Pi
Be glad to go on water and then phase change to show you guys linear scaling.
While you may need an AC blowing on your system. I have the equipment actually designed to do cold properly so why bother. Makes alot more sense to bolt cold to cpu than blow it at it
So while you do it out of necessity I don't bother. I use AC's for what they are meant for, keep room at 72F
It's summer time that AC is doing what it's meant to do, keep my living room cool.
Last edited by chew*; 06-12-2010 at 05:35 PM.
heatware chew*
I've got no strings to hold me down.
To make me fret, or make me frown.
I had strings but now I'm free.
There are no strings on me
Yep thats MSI for you at 72F.
Clocks cpu alot higher at the cost of clock per clock performance.
Titan we have had this discussion before, assumption is the mother of all F ups.
Might want to check HW bot, I do own the fastest single core chip in Pi
Be glad to go on water and then phase change to show you guys linear scaling.
While you may need an AC blowing on your system. I have the equipment actually designed to do cold properly so why bother. Makes alot more sense to bolt cold to cpu than blow it at it
So while you do it out of necessity I don't bother. I use AC's for what they are meant for, keep room at 72F
It's summer time that AC is doing what it's meant to do, keep my living room cool.
Wow, dont be so modest ....
AMD 1090T@4.0ghz
Enzotech sapphire/Mo-Ra extreme rad
Asus Crosshair IV Formula
ht 2400mhz / nb 2400mhz
12gb Gskill 1300mhz
HIS HD5970
Enermax Evo Galaxy 1250
case: XCLIO A380PLUS-BK
4.61ghz water
4.5ghz superpi 1M 15.585
http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/j...rpi4500mhz.jpg
25,396 06 Phenom 965@ 4.4ghz HIS 5970@960/1260
21,893 Vantage, Phenom 965 4.2ghz HIS 5970 @960/1260
Phenom 2 125w 965 test results
http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=117414
Phenom 2 140w 965 test results
http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=109214
Phenom 2 AM2+ 940 cold air results
http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...ad.php?t=97430
If I dont get every single drop out of my cpu I feel like someone is stealing from me
converation is over not taking your baitWow, dont be so modest ....
heatware chew*
I've got no strings to hold me down.
To make me fret, or make me frown.
I had strings but now I'm free.
There are no strings on me
good choice.converation is over not taking your bait
AMD 1090T@4.0ghz
Enzotech sapphire/Mo-Ra extreme rad
Asus Crosshair IV Formula
ht 2400mhz / nb 2400mhz
12gb Gskill 1300mhz
HIS HD5970
Enermax Evo Galaxy 1250
case: XCLIO A380PLUS-BK
4.61ghz water
4.5ghz superpi 1M 15.585
http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/j...rpi4500mhz.jpg
25,396 06 Phenom 965@ 4.4ghz HIS 5970@960/1260
21,893 Vantage, Phenom 965 4.2ghz HIS 5970 @960/1260
Phenom 2 125w 965 test results
http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=117414
Phenom 2 140w 965 test results
http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=109214
Phenom 2 AM2+ 940 cold air results
http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...ad.php?t=97430
If I dont get every single drop out of my cpu I feel like someone is stealing from me
tested again after a while to take screen shots
sorry for the late screen shots, but better late than never i guess.
idle:
load:
stable -.-
computer refuses to boot up @ anything above 3.75Ghz, some friend told me that my psu is holding me back overclocking a 6-core processor, it's a 650w coolermaster psu, shouldn't that be enough to reach 4.0Ghz?!
Last edited by DeMagH; 06-13-2010 at 02:15 AM.
I have a HX 520W running +4.15GHz so no problem there.
It depends on what GPU(s) and other hw you have?
You really should look over your temperatures!
(Speedfan Temp1 is your CPU temperature, you shouldn't go after Core Temp as there is a difference in core and cpu temp)
65C is a bit high, you don't want to go over 62C...
Last edited by nex_73; 06-13-2010 at 02:47 AM.
My stuff
PhII x6 1055T @ 4.2GHz | Corsair H50 + Scythe SL12SH PnP | Asus Crosshair IV F | 4GB Dominator 1600 CL8 | Corsair HX520W | CM HAF932 | Dell 2405FPW | Creative 5.1 THX |
The gpu is an HD 4670 @ stock. not a big deal i guess.
well its hot nowadays in egypt "where i live" and i don't usually do stressful operations on the cpu, but it is a good note as i figured out my temps are a bit higher than most, using freezer pro 7 rev.2, might want to recheck the HS base some other time later.
also, what temps should i stick to?! core temp reporting 57c as u can see in the LOAD screen shot while speedfan is @ 65
Well a 4670 could not stress the PSU more then my GF 9600GT
57C is your CORE temp and 65C is your CPU temp
It's the CPU temp you should go after (stick to) - not getting over 62C
My stuff
PhII x6 1055T @ 4.2GHz | Corsair H50 + Scythe SL12SH PnP | Asus Crosshair IV F | 4GB Dominator 1600 CL8 | Corsair HX520W | CM HAF932 | Dell 2405FPW | Creative 5.1 THX |
I got a new one
* CPU Stepping: CCBBE CB 1010BPMW
* CPU Frequency: 4004 MHz
* CPU vCore: 1.424V (1.44 load)
* CPU Multiplier: 14x
* CPU Turbo: Disabled
* CPU NB Speed: 2860 MHz
* HT Ref Speed: 286 MHz
* RAM Speed: DDR3-1525
* RAM Timings: 6-8-6-24-2T
* RAM Configuration: 4 GB (2 x 2 GB)
* RAM vDIMM: 1.65V
* Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-890GPA-UD3H (Rev 2)
* Chipset/Socket: AM3, 890GX + SB850
* Cooling: Air (Megahalems)
* Temps: ~22C Idle / 43C Load (HWMon)
* Operating System: Windows 7
* 32/64-Bit: 64
* Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable 10 hours Prime95 Blend
http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/7861/105540test.png
Got my 1090t setup running only a couple days ago. At 4.2 with 1.42v so far, still working things out. Loving the 1090t so far though, great for $299.
http://img.techpowerup.org/100616/Capture013.jpg
4.2GHz, 1.38v idle, 1.42v load.
* CPU Stepping: ----
* CPU Frequency: 4200 MHz
* CPU vCore: 1.38v (1.42v load)
* CPU Multiplier: 21x
* CPU Turbo: Disabled
* CPU NB Speed: [testing]
* HT Ref Speed: 200 MHz
* RAM Speed: DDR3-1600
* RAM Timings: [testing]
* RAM Configuration: 4 GB (2 x 2 GB)
* RAM vDIMM: 1.68V
* Motherboard: MSI 890FXA-GD70
* Chipset/Socket: AM3, 890GX + SB850
* Cooling: Water - Apogee XT
* Temps: 18C Idle / 35C Load (HWMon)
* Operating System: Windows 7
* 32/64-Bit: 64
* Stable/Suicide/Untested: Untested, 5 runs of ITB
Last edited by batmang; 06-16-2010 at 02:06 PM.
i5 2500K @ 5GHz (1.4v) | Biostar TP67B+ | 8GB GSKILL 1600
HEATWARE / Rate My RIG / i7 950 @ 4.6GHz / 1090T @ 4.5GHz / i5 2500K @ 5GHz
I'll get your guys' new entries when I'm back in town Friday.
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Rule 3:
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
This thread should be stickied ?
why is not.
+1 for sticky
HAVE NO FEAR!
"AMD fallen angel"
You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.
I agree demonkevy666
I hope they finally do so
AMD 1055T, Biostar TA890FXE, Mushkin 1600 6-8-6-24, Hd 5870, Corasair Hx1000, Twin liang D5
+1 for sticky
And maybe a "standard" for cpu temp/voltage readings... ?
HWiNFO32 is good and should manage to get the readings of most boards...
My stuff
PhII x6 1055T @ 4.2GHz | Corsair H50 + Scythe SL12SH PnP | Asus Crosshair IV F | 4GB Dominator 1600 CL8 | Corsair HX520W | CM HAF932 | Dell 2405FPW | Creative 5.1 THX |
Updated the charts with all known-outstanding submissions. PM me if I've missed you.
Regarding stickying this topic, someone just needs to message a moderator like MovieMan and they'll do it. I don't want to do it myself since it would just seem that I'm trying to serve my own purposes although I agree.
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
+1 for sticky as well >> do we really need to vote for this?! the thread speaks for itself, informative, organized .. etc.
The mods don't regularly cruise the AMD section for threads to sticky. They've said in the past to tell them if you want something stickied. That's how the original Phenom list of overclocks got to be so.
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Water testing MSI now.
Still scaling speed. Imagine that
heatware chew*
I've got no strings to hold me down.
To make me fret, or make me frown.
I had strings but now I'm free.
There are no strings on me
* CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
* CPU Stepping: Under Cpu cooler
* CPU Frequency: 4200 MHz
* CPU vCore: 1.5V (LLC 1,55)
* CPU Multiplier: 14x
* CPU Turbo: Disabled
* CPU NB Speed: 2400 MHz
* HT Ref Speed: 300 MHz
* RAM Speed: DDR3-1600
* RAM Timings: 9-9-9-24-27-1T
* RAM Configuration: 4 GB (2 x 2 GB)
* RAM vDIMM: 1.7V
* Motherboard: ASUS M4A89GTD Pro
* Chipset/Socket: AM3, 890FX + SB850
* Cooling: Air (Noctua NH-D14)
* Temps: 17C Idle / 46C Load
* Operating System: Windows 7
* 32/64-Bit: 64
* Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable/Untested (Prime 5h, large TTF)
Note: core5 is only multi 12,5
Last edited by Tenkura; 07-08-2010 at 04:23 PM.
Image is nothing - thirst is everything.
chew* CPUZ Realy Show True Voltage? 1.3 With 4.8GHZ Vcore????
Asus Crosshair IV Formula
AMD FX-8120
ATI HD5750 Silent+ATI HD5770
Kingston 1333 2*2GB
GP1035B
Zalman CNPS 10X Extreme
Sorry For My Great English
maybe if hes on 32nmchew* CPUZ Realy Show True Voltage? 1.3 With 4.8GHZ Vcore????
LEO!!!! amd phenom II x6 1100T | gigabyte 990fxa-ud3 . . 2x2gb g.skill 2133c8 | 128gb g.skill falcon ssd sapphire ati 5850 | x-fi xtrememusic. . . samsung f4 2tb | samsung dvdrw . . corsair tx850w | windows 7 64-bit. ddc3.25 xspc restop | ek ltx | mc-tdx | BIP . . lycosa-g9-z2300 | 26" 1920x1200 lcd .
ok, i will wait for that...
990FXA-UD3 | FX8350@4.7Ghz | Asus HD7870 | 2x 4GB Crucial Ballistix Tracer 2050Mhz 8-8-8-22 | AX850W |SSD Vertex3 Max IOPS 120GB | Auzentech Forte + TAPCO-S5
EK Supreme Full-Gold | XSPC RX240 + EX120 | MCP35x | 3x Koolance Blue Led @PWM | Tygon Black 1/2 | Bitspower Compression | @ FM CM690 I
* CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE
* CPU Stepping: unknow, did not check
* CPU Frequency: 4202.4mhz
* CPU vCore: 1.480
* CPU Multiplier: 20.5x
* CPU Turbo: Disabled
* CPU NB Speed: 2664.9MHz
* HT Ref Speed: 205 MHz
* RAM Speed: DDR3-1366.6
* RAM Timings: 6-7-6-18-1T
* RAM Configuration: 4 GB (2 x 2 GB)
* RAM vDIMM: 1.85V
* Motherboard: MSI 790fx gd-70
* Chipset/Socket: AM3, 790FX + SB750
* Cooling: liquid, pa120.2, mcw 355/ek g3/8 top, dtek v2, mcw60v2
* Temps: 28C Idle / 42C Load, dynamic fan profile
* Operating System: Windows 7
* 32/64-Bit: 64
* Stable/Suicide/Untested: Untested, seams stable but i cannot waste power with 8 hours of occt in the summer, its stable for 45min
SS in the HWbot
http://hwbot.org/community/submissio...be_16sec_678ms
5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi
nah no where near that, roughly 1.55 IIRC, ambients havent changed and on a smallish rad 2x120 + dtek ( my high performance water setup is down atm ).chew* CPUZ Realy Show True Voltage? 1.3 With 4.8GHZ Vcore????
Tbh it makes almost no diff in single threaded ( 100 mhz ) and no gains at all for max cpu-z, need cold temps from my phase to see gains i guess.
Load apps is where i see the biggest diff.
Last edited by chew*; 06-21-2010 at 05:31 PM.
heatware chew*
I've got no strings to hold me down.
To make me fret, or make me frown.
I had strings but now I'm free.
There are no strings on me
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks