Back In Black or something like that.

[chew*]

Great show chew* but you forgot '05 and '06.

Sadly 01/03/05/and 06 are not thubans strong points.

I think i have a 6.5 x4 chip I can dig out and see what this board can get it to however

Yes zeus dominator 1600 c6 are better for the casual benchers and more budget minded for those users. When I get time I am going to wrap up a review on both gtx2 and 1600 c6.

[Zeus]

Sadly 01/03/05/and 06 are not thubans strong points.

I think i have a 6.5 x4 chip I can dig out and see what this board can get it to however

Yes zeus dominator 1600 c6 are better for the casual benchers and more budget minded for those users. When I get time I am going to wrap up a review on both gtx2 and 1600 c6.

Wouldn't say Thuban is worse than deneb in 03/05/06, the two extra cores seem to boost 06 quite a bit.

A GTX2 vs 1600C6 review would be very interesting, looking forward to that.

[chew*]

Wouldn't say Thuban is worse than deneb in 03/05/06, the two extra cores seem to boost 06 quite a bit.

A GTX2 vs 1600C6 review would be very interesting, looking forward to that.

They are great for air/water/phase/DI zeus. They are faster clock per clock in 06 but if clocks can't be matched at top end it is what it is

Otherwise I would have beat my previous 06 runs on x4 which I can't. Your 03/05 argument is invalid. Neither benefit from more cores.

[Zeus]

Your 03/05 argument is invalid. Neither benefit from more cores.

I wasn't saying they're better but they're not worse clock per clock either.

But i understand they don't overclock as well as quad cores so in the end quad will win, right?