Quote Originally Posted by stinkas View Post
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...review-18.html

To me the conclusion reads like someone who is biased but trying not to come off as biased. One minute SLI minimums are king, then the next Xfire is scaling better etc.

Everyone has bias, this is not the issue. The issue comes when it is preventing someone from being completely objective.
SKYMTL's comments in this forum seem to indicate a deep bias that prevents him from seeing what some of us would describe as obvious. He just gives the impression that he believes Nv can do no wrong, and anyone who says different no matter how legitimate a source they are, is either lying or simply mistaken and confused.
Honestly don't get it. He ran the benches and got numbers from them. The SLI min's were overall better. The X-fire scaling was overall better. The X-Fire power consumption was overall better. And he writes as much.
Quote Originally Posted by The Review
"We’re just not that excited about it because ATI threw a live hand grenade into the SLI party by posting performance increases that were simply jaw-dropping in nearly every respect."

"it becomes extremely hard to recommend a GTX 470 SLI setup at this point in time for someone who isn’t hell-bent on going with NVIDIA cards."
What exactly would you see done differently?