Page 1 of 12 123411 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 293

Thread: Fastpath..

  1. #1
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    701

    Fastpath..

    I started late so I haven't done many benches but for those wondering..

    550mb/sec 4k@qd32

    90k pcmv hdd suite score


    Will post benches in the coming days. For those that have it, somewhere I can look that says fastpath enabled would make me feel better?

    7/8 c300 firmwares went fine, one did some weird waiting for <hex> code...

    then at the end it said my fw version was that hex code. Rebooted and drive wasn't seen unplugged/replugged rebooted drive seen with that hex code for fw. Was able to flash over it but it only took a second to complete, tomorrow I will bench drive by drive to see if one is bad.

    Fastpath looks good so far.

    Edit: Everything completely stock and ram at whatever optimized default was, 1333mhz I think.
    Last edited by mbreslin; 05-26-2010 at 08:35 PM.
    slowpoke:
    mm ascension
    gigabyte x58a-ud7
    980x@4.4ghz (29x152) 1.392 vcore 24/7
    corsair dominator gt 6gb 1824mhz 7-7-7-19
    2xEVGA GTX TITAN
    os: Crucial C300 256GB 3R0 on Intel ICH10R
    storage: samsung 2tb f3
    cooling:
    loop1: mcp350>pa120.4>ek supreme hf
    loop2: mcp355>2xpa120.3>>ek nb/sb
    22x scythe s-flex "F"

  2. #2
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    513
    If your 550MB/s 4KB@QD32 is from CDM, and you're running on stock settings, you are likely CPU-bound by one core/thread. Try AS SSD (wich uses 64 threads), or an IOmeter config with # of workers = threads (8 or 16?), and scale QD.
    I'd be happy to assist you with making a couple of graphs of IOmeter data to illustrate the scaling. I've got data for Computurds 8R0 barefoot array with fastpath, so we could compare them

  3. #3
    PCMark V Meister
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Athens GR
    Posts
    771
    i will post my results in cvs today
    if u want to make a new thread to post our results and if gulllars has the time to make us some graphs.
    just make one file to test.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    701
    Before I go to bed I thought I would see if I could quickly recognize if a drive turned gimp from the fw flash so I compared 2x 4 disk arrays. They seem close enough to me that if one had a dud in it it would be more noticeable.



    Tomorrow I'm happy to do iometer to show full scaling, I still need to find the sweet spot as far as controller settings. Night.
    slowpoke:
    mm ascension
    gigabyte x58a-ud7
    980x@4.4ghz (29x152) 1.392 vcore 24/7
    corsair dominator gt 6gb 1824mhz 7-7-7-19
    2xEVGA GTX TITAN
    os: Crucial C300 256GB 3R0 on Intel ICH10R
    storage: samsung 2tb f3
    cooling:
    loop1: mcp350>pa120.4>ek supreme hf
    loop2: mcp355>2xpa120.3>>ek nb/sb
    22x scythe s-flex "F"

  5. #5
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Warrenton, VA
    Posts
    3,029
    Quote Originally Posted by GullLars View Post
    If your 550MB/s 4KB@QD32 is from CDM, and you're running on stock settings, you are likely CPU-bound by one core/thread. Try AS SSD (wich uses 64 threads), or an IOmeter config with # of workers = threads (8 or 16?), and scale QD.
    I'd be happy to assist you with making a couple of graphs of IOmeter data to illustrate the scaling. I've got data for Computurds 8R0 barefoot array with fastpath, so we could compare them
    Lars or Paul - do you want to send me a iometer config or should i just make one up to match the table Paul posted? single worker?

  6. #6
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Warrenton, VA
    Posts
    3,029
    @ mrbreslin - your pcmv HDD scores are right up there with the best!
    anxiously waiting for your suite score.

    My best to date - (and believe me i run this bench alot) - is approx 97K
    (I think it was 1231 with 5x acard, this with pulling out all the stops, 4.5 oc and pcie at 119).

    I can do pcmv hdd test of ~135K by setting drive size to <4GB and running out of controller cache but that is not w7 bootable.
    The smallest vlite w7x64+pcmv I can create (so far) is approx 5.1GB.
    Last edited by SteveRo; 05-27-2010 at 03:00 AM.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    513
    I have created an IOmeter config set that will fit your goals for checking out 4KB random read with FastPath. It's actually a set of configs for a larger project charting 4KB random read scaling by QD for various drives and arrays.
    4KB random read project.zip
    I've attached a txt file with info, i'll quote it here:
    INFO on the 4KB random project.
    IOmeter configs by GullLars.

    The point of this project is to chart 4KB random read scaling of various drives and arrays.

    There are 2 series of configs, one for arrays off controllers with cache, and one for drives and arrays off controllers whitout cache or cache smaller than 256MB.
    The cache series of configs use a 10GB testfile, 5 sec ramp, and 25 sec runtime for 10mins total divided by #workers.
    The NOcache series of configs use a 1GB testfile, 1 sec ramp, and 9 sec runtime for 100sec total divided by #workers.

    Access specification: 4KB, 100% random, 100% read, 4KB alligned IO's

    Queue Depth (# of outstanding IO's) scales exp2 from 1*#workers to 1024. This is to allow mapping of the full scaling of larger arrays.


    To make it possible to handle results from many people, the naming of result files will be as follows:
    {Username}_{#of drives}{RAID level}_{drive name & size}_{RAIDcard/HBA name}_{stripe size}_{cache type}.csv
    Example: GullLars_2R0_Mtron 7025 32GB_SB650_SS32KB_WT.csv
    Include a .txt file with additional info on array, like drivers, firmware, read ahead, OC settings, etc.

    To avoid large numbers of result files pr user for those running multiple configs (f.ex. 1/2/4/8 workers) for the same array, you can use the same result file for all runs on the same array as long as the settings are unchanged. This is done by using the same name for the result file. The new results are added at the bottom of the file and don't overwrite the old.
    I suggest you guys run 1 worker and #workers = #CPUthreads and post the results, and i'll make some graphs.
    Pleese use the cache file (10 min runtime for 1 worker, <1,5min for 8 workers) for 9260.

  8. #8
    PCMark V Meister
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Athens GR
    Posts
    771
    how do i set it to 3 workers??? im getting maximum performance with only 3 workers.

  9. #9
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    513
    Take the 4W config and remove one of them, it's the button nr 2-3 from the right at the top. Remember to specify you using 3 workers, since i will calculate wrong otherwise. I would appreciate it if you did 1, 2, and 4 workers too, so we can compare scaling by workers.

  10. #10
    PCMark V Meister
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Athens GR
    Posts
    771
    gulllars the zip file is corrupted :S it cant be opent from winrar or even form windows zip client

  11. #11
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    513
    I just downloaded it and opened one of the configs. It's not corrupt.
    I've noticed you sometimes get the corrupt message on zip files others get to work.
    Can someone else confirm if the file is or is not corrupt?

  12. #12
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    2,838
    Tilt, GullLars

    The zip file opens just fine using 7Zip.
    (didn't work using the built-in extract all method in W7)

    7Zip ftw!
    -
    Hardware:

  13. #13
    PCMark V Meister
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Athens GR
    Posts
    771
    did u make it work with IOmeter? can u open the profile with IOmeter?

  14. #14
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    2,838
    Tilt,

    No, I didn't check, give me a few moments and I'll do a test.

    I think it's the XS forum that wraps the file somehow, looks like it's nested?

    config.JPG

    Just drag and drop from the 7Zip filemanager.
    Config files are ok, should be 11 files. (10 config files)
    Last edited by Anvil; 05-27-2010 at 08:49 AM.
    -
    Hardware:

  15. #15
    PCMark V Meister
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Athens GR
    Posts
    771
    ok im loading profiles and just puch the start button right?? i dont touch anything. do i have to tick on my workers the test drive?

  16. #16
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    2,838
    Tilt,

    You need to select the drive, that's all.
    In case you have a iobw.tst file with a different length on your drive you should delete the file before starting iometer.

    (Also you might wan't to "run as administrator")
    -
    Hardware:

  17. #17
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    701
    I'm not ready to submit, I want to try different stripe sizes. I'm a little underwhelmed so far 8500 iops at qd1, 85k at qd32 (1 worker).
    slowpoke:
    mm ascension
    gigabyte x58a-ud7
    980x@4.4ghz (29x152) 1.392 vcore 24/7
    corsair dominator gt 6gb 1824mhz 7-7-7-19
    2xEVGA GTX TITAN
    os: Crucial C300 256GB 3R0 on Intel ICH10R
    storage: samsung 2tb f3
    cooling:
    loop1: mcp350>pa120.4>ek supreme hf
    loop2: mcp355>2xpa120.3>>ek nb/sb
    22x scythe s-flex "F"

  18. #18
    PCMark V Meister
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Athens GR
    Posts
    771
    ok the first test 4kb random project cache 16W

  19. #19
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    2,838
    >40MB/s at QD1 is a great result, looks like it almost doubles for every QD up to QD4 ~302MB/s.

    Looking forward to that Key
    -
    Hardware:

  20. #20
    PCMark V Meister
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Athens GR
    Posts
    771
    do u want to run another test?

  21. #21
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    2,838
    Tilt,

    The iometer configs 1-16W should be sufficient but you could do a CDM @1GB just for the reference.

    @mbreslin
    Take your time, we can('t) wait
    -
    Hardware:

  22. #22
    PCMark V Meister
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Athens GR
    Posts
    771
    ---------------------------------------------------------------
    CrystalDiskMark 3.0 Technical Preview#1 (C) 2007-2009 hiyohiyo
    Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
    ---------------------------------------------------------------

    Sequential Read : 1494.986 MB/s
    Sequential Write : 492.210 MB/s
    Random Read 512KB : 954.204 MB/s
    Random Write 512KB : 482.645 MB/s
    Random Read 4KB : 22.354 MB/s [ 5457.6 IOPS]
    Random Write 4KB : 60.409 MB/s [ 14748.4 IOPS]
    Random Read 4KB (QD=4) : 87.647 MB/s [ 21398.2 IOPS]
    Random Write 4KB (QD=4) : 208.439 MB/s [ 50888.4 IOPS]
    Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 407.282 MB/s [ 99434.0 IOPS]
    Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 350.489 MB/s [ 85568.5 IOPS]

    Test Size : 2000 MB
    Date : 2010/05/27 22:18:09

  23. #23
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    513
    Tiltevros, the result file you posted was for another config entirely. The config you ran was 512B-64KB random, 2 workers, QD 1-32 pr worker.
    I would love it if you could run all 5 configs for arrays with cache, 1-16 workers, to show scaling with threads.
    It seems you also misunderstood the naming, you wrote 600GB, i'm guessing that's 80GB drives? so it's "8R0 x25-M 80GB LSI9260 SS16KB WT".
    EDIT: read ahead, fastpath key installed, etc you can alternatively add as notes in a .txt file in the zip.

  24. #24
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Warrenton, VA
    Posts
    3,029
    Quote Originally Posted by GullLars View Post
    I have created an IOmeter config set that will fit your goals for checking out 4KB random read with FastPath. It's actually a set of configs for a larger project charting 4KB random read scaling by QD for various drives and arrays.
    4KB random read project.zip
    I've attached a txt file with info, i'll quote it here:


    I suggest you guys run 1 worker and #workers = #CPUthreads and post the results, and i'll make some graphs.
    Pleese use the cache file (10 min runtime for 1 worker, <1,5min for 8 workers) for 9260.
    I will run this on 1231/acards sometime in the next day or three - just point to the drive and execute?

  25. #25
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    513
    Yep, all settings except target are in place.
    If you run more than one config to get results for 1-16 threads, you can use the same output file for all.

Page 1 of 12 123411 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •