Page 1 of 5 1234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 107

Thread: NVIDIA Announces GeForce GTX 480M Mobile GPU

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    244

    NVIDIA Announces GeForce GTX 480M Mobile GPU

    http://www.nvidia.com/object/product...x-480m-us.html

    352 CUDA cores
    Core 425Mhz
    Shader 850Mhz
    256bit 2400Mhz GDDR5
    Last edited by mindfury; 05-25-2010 at 08:08 AM.

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    580
    the world's most power draining notebook GPU
    Last edited by -Sweeper_; 05-25-2010 at 08:14 AM.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    2,084
    Wanted: Lots of jokes about how hot it is and how much power it uses, maybe throw in "can it play crysis?" while you're at it, or a pic of a burning laptop. We just can't get enough of it.

    Really.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    466
    I think for a notebook that card is insane. Xtreme alright!

  5. #5
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Europe/Slovenia/Ljubljana
    Posts
    1,540
    Last time i've seen info, this "GTX 480M" is suppose to be slightly modified GTS 250 core...

    EDIT:
    Correction, it was the GTX 280M. My bad.
    Intel Core i7 920 4 GHz | 18 GB DDR3 1600 MHz | ASUS Rampage II Gene | GIGABYTE HD7950 3GB WindForce 3X | WD Caviar Black 2TB | Creative Sound Blaster Z | Altec Lansing MX5021 | Corsair HX750 | Lian Li PC-V354
    Super silent cooling powered by (((Noiseblocker)))

  6. #6
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,870
    Those specs don't make sense.

    A 352 shader part should have 44 TMUs for 37.4GT/s and not 18.7GT/s (half that). It should also have 1.2 Gflops and not 900 Gflops for 850/1700 clocks.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    244
    Quote Originally Posted by trinibwoy View Post
    Those specs don't make sense.

    A 352 shader part should have 44 TMUs for 37.4GT/s and not 18.7GT/s (half that). It should also have 1.2 Gflops and not 900 Gflops for 850/1700 clocks.
    Core 425/Shader 850 clocks

  8. #8
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,870
    Quote Originally Posted by mindfury View Post
    Core 425/Shader 850 clocks
    Ah that makes more sense given the reported texture throughput. But it doesn't explain the Gflops. 352 shaders at 850Mhz is ~ 600Gflops.

  9. #9
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Bucharest, Romania
    Posts
    381
    352 shaders at 425 mhz. GTX 480 is 480 at 700. And it's around 1.35 gigaflops. I actually don't know if it's really 900 gflops, should be lower than that.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	specs.JPG 
Views:	931 
Size:	71.9 KB 
ID:	104725  

  10. #10
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    302
    Dose the outlet require to be 220v @ 15amps for this portable fermunce? If anyone claims its a LAPtop, they must have a really good flame suit.

    I wonder what type of voltage this chip is running?
    Motherboard: GigaByte P67UD4 f6 | CPU: Intel 2500k 4.5ghz 1.26v | Memory: GSkill 2x4gb @ 1600mhz 1.34v | PSU: SeaSonic X650 Gold 650W | Video: AMD 6970 Koolance water block 880c/1450mem 1.035v | HDD: WD 640gb cavier black: VelociRaptor 300gb: Intel x-25 g2 80gb | Sound: Asus xonar D1 | OS: W7 64bit

  11. #11
    One-Eyed Killing Machine
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside a pot
    Posts
    6,340
    Under 0.82V.
    Coding 24/7... Limited forums/PMs time.

    -Justice isn't blind, Justice is ashamed.

    Many thanks to: Sue Wu, Yiwen Lin, Steven Kuo, Crystal Chen, Vivian Lien, Joe Chan, Sascha Krohn, Joe James, Dan Snyder, Amy Deng, Jack Peterson, Hank Peng, Mafalda Cogliani, Olivia Lee, Marta Piccoli, Mike Clements, Alex Ruedinger, Oliver Baltuch, Korinna Dieck, Steffen Eisentein, Francois Piednoel, Tanja Markovic, Cyril Pelupessy (R.I.P. ), Juan J. Guerrero

  12. #12
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    City of Lights, The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,381
    Quote Originally Posted by Sgt.McRuff View Post
    If anyone claims its a LAPtop, they must have a really good flame suit.
    No the motive behind a laptop featuring this GPU is much more sinister than you think. The thought is that anyone stupid enough to buy such a laptop should not be able to reproduce, which is why such a laptop will put out so much heat that anyone who dares to put it on their lap will be sterilized.
    "When in doubt, C-4!" -- Jamie Hyneman

    Silverstone TJ-09 Case | Seasonic X-750 PSU | Intel Core i5 750 CPU | ASUS P7P55D PRO Mobo | OCZ 4GB DDR3 RAM | ATI Radeon 5850 GPU | Intel X-25M 80GB SSD | WD 2TB HDD | Windows 7 x64 | NEC EA23WMi 23" Monitor |Auzentech X-Fi Forte Soundcard | Creative T3 2.1 Speakers | AudioTechnica AD900 Headphone |

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by Mats View Post
    Wanted: Lots of jokes about how hot it is and how much power it uses, maybe throw in "can it play crysis?" while you're at it, or a pic of a burning laptop. We just can't get enough of it.

    Really.

  14. #14
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Oslo - Norway
    Posts
    2,879
    Hey kids why don't you QUOTE your genius insider about the bad performance this time?

    It is really embracing for this forum. People jump on and starts bushing everything that comes nVidia and Intel, before the product hits the marked, and before any real benchmarks or results.

    Get a clue before you jump on judging an unreleased product.

    ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
    2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
    Silver Arrow , push/pull
    2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
    GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
    CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
    +
    EVGA SR-2 , A50
    2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
    Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
    3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
    XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
    SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Madison Wisconsin, U.S.A.
    Posts
    46
    But is it faster than 5870M and when can we expect a flag ship laptop with this part, such as the ASUS G73?

    If it's faster, I don't care how short my battery life is or how hot it gets!
    Last edited by TehVince; 05-25-2010 at 11:14 AM.

    __________________________________________________

    AMD Phenom II X4 "B50" 3.8GHz/2.6GHz NB/1.46v
    ATI Radeon HD4850 700MHz/2500MHz
    4GB OCZ Platinum DDR3 1333MHz/5-5-5-15-20 1T/1.90v
    MSI 790FX-GD70
    Auzentech X-Meridian 7.1 PCI
    Cooler Master CM690
    Corsair HX850W
    Thermalright Ultra 120
    Dual Dell 2407WFP 24" LCD's
    __________________________________________________

  16. #16
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    1,123
    Quote Originally Posted by TehVince View Post
    But is it faster than 5870M and when can we expect a flag ship laptop with this part, such as the ASUS G73?
    Product answers next week.. and it works just fine so far....

  17. #17
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    America's Finest City
    Posts
    2,078
    Afaik, the G73 was built with some wiggleroom on the GPU something like 50w... so it should be able to handle an NV GTX 400M series GPU.
    Quote Originally Posted by FUGGER View Post
    I am magical.

  18. #18
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Madison Wisconsin, U.S.A.
    Posts
    46
    I can't wait, I hope it out performs the ATI offering!

    The G73 has a great chassis (no fans underneath, like a Mac!), it would be awesome if we had a choice of GPUs.
    Last edited by TehVince; 05-25-2010 at 11:13 AM.

    __________________________________________________

    AMD Phenom II X4 "B50" 3.8GHz/2.6GHz NB/1.46v
    ATI Radeon HD4850 700MHz/2500MHz
    4GB OCZ Platinum DDR3 1333MHz/5-5-5-15-20 1T/1.90v
    MSI 790FX-GD70
    Auzentech X-Meridian 7.1 PCI
    Cooler Master CM690
    Corsair HX850W
    Thermalright Ultra 120
    Dual Dell 2407WFP 24" LCD's
    __________________________________________________

  19. #19
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    312
    Am I the only one that noticed that this fits the specifications for the GTX465.
    My rig the Kill-Jacker

    CPU: AMD Phenom II 1055T 3.82GHz
    Mobo: ASUS Crosshair IV Extreme
    Game GPU: EVGA GTX580
    Secondary GPU 2: EVGA GTX470
    Memory: Mushkin DDR3 1600 Ridgeback 8GB
    PSU: Silverstone SST-ST1000-P
    HDD: WD 250GB Blue 7200RPM
    HDD2: WD 1TB Blue 7200RPM
    CPU Cooler: TRUE120 Rev. B Pull
    Case: Antec 1200


    FAH Tracker V2 Project Site

  20. #20
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Lansing, MI / London / Stinkaypore
    Posts
    1,788
    Quote Originally Posted by =SOC= Admiral View Post
    Am I the only one that noticed that this fits the specifications for the GTX465.
    Hmm, if the way they cut the units are the same...

    0.7x core clock
    ~0.75x memory clock

    So you get 0.8x (max) perf of a GTX 465, which itself like a GTX 285/275 or so...
    GTX260 performance or so?

    It will definitely be the fastest mobile GPU, no thanks to the anemic 128-bit memory interface of Juniper (you can't really clock RAM fast on notebooks). But the gap should be less than expected- about 15-20% more performance? For double the TDP...


    I'm still seeing HP's Envy 15 (if it didn't have that many problems)/17 as the perfect notebook blend for the majority of gamers (who really game)- definitely enough graphics performance, without the heft or uglyness associated with a gaming notebook. These are just gonna sell way more than any Alienware/Clevo, so nVidia really needs a 20-40W lineup on Fermi soon, and hopefully GF104 is (part) of the answer.

    But really, congrats to nVidia on making a 530mm2 chip fit with 100W cooling on a design, and actually selling it! ATI would have a hard time doing that for several reasons.
    Quote Originally Posted by radaja View Post
    so are they launching BD soon or a comic book?

  21. #21
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,247
    german notebook e-tailer mysn already offers notebooks with 480m for preorder.

    it's about time nvidia streamlines their mobile offerings. they used the same architecture over and over again. i think a castrated fermi with a lower power draw could be a pretty good mobile gpu.
    1. Asus P5Q-E / Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 @~3612 MHz (8,5x425) / 2x2GB OCZ Platinum XTC (PC2-8000U, CL5) / EVGA GeForce GTX 570 / Crucial M4 128GB, WD Caviar Blue 640GB, WD Caviar SE16 320GB, WD Caviar SE 160GB / be quiet! Dark Power Pro P7 550W / Thermaltake Tsunami VA3000BWA / LG L227WT / Teufel Concept E Magnum 5.1 // SysProfile


    2. Asus A8N-SLI / AMD Athlon 64 4000+ @~2640 MHz (12x220) / 1024 MB Corsair CMX TwinX 3200C2, 2.5-3-3-6 1T / Club3D GeForce 7800GT @463/1120 MHz / Crucial M4 64GB, Hitachi Deskstar 40GB / be quiet! Blackline P5 470W

  22. #22
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,116
    regarding the heat of the gtx 480m. there are laptops with dual 75W gtx280m chips. 150W of graphics in one laptop. this new chip will not be unusual.


    Quote Originally Posted by =SOC= Admiral View Post
    Am I the only one that noticed that this fits the specifications for the GTX465.
    the gtx465 isnt even announced yet. it has no specifications.

  23. #23
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Oslo - Norway
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by RaZz! View Post
    german notebook e-tailer mysn already offers notebooks with 480m for preorder.

    it's about time nvidia streamlines their mobile offerings. they used the same architecture over and over again. i think a castrated fermi with a lower power draw could be a pretty good mobile gpu.
    It was actually pretty fast, after all Fermi is just a few months old. Why should we call it "castrated Fermi"? nobody puts a full blown desktop GPU in a notebook. Maybe a flexible and scalable Fermi-architecture is making this possible so fast?
    Last edited by Sam_oslo; 05-25-2010 at 12:09 PM.

    ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
    2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
    Silver Arrow , push/pull
    2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
    GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
    CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
    +
    EVGA SR-2 , A50
    2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
    Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
    3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
    XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
    SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W

  24. #24
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Canaduh
    Posts
    731
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam_oslo View Post
    Hey kids why don't you QUOTE your genius insider about the bad performance this time?

    It is really embracing for this forum. People jump on and starts bushing everything that comes nVidia and Intel, before the product hits the marked, and before any real benchmarks or results.

    Get a clue before you jump on judging an unreleased product.
    lol the jokes went from slow,hot unmanufaturable to hot only
    Intel i7 980x / 3001B331
    HK3.0+LaingDDCPRO+XSPCRX360+1xMCR220
    EVGA Classified X58+EK FB
    6GB Corsair Dominator GT 1866 7-8-7-20(TR3X6G1866C7GT)
    ASUS GTX580
    Enermax Revolution+85 950w
    Corsair Obsidian






  25. #25
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    Quote Originally Posted by Macadamia View Post
    But really, congrats to nVidia on making a 530mm2 chip fit with 100W cooling on a design, and actually selling it!
    is the chip going into the laptops really that big, just shut off pieces by lazer cuts or whatever the hell they do? i dont think i would want such a big chip in a laptop, takes up way too much space

Page 1 of 5 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •