MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 954

Thread: AMD "Thuban" Core (Phenom II X6) XS Overclocking Charts

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    Anyone notice the trends for 1055 vs 1090 on +MHz/+mV? The 1090s seem to be providing better results in terms of frequency gains per extra millivolt applied. The statistic takes base frequency into account. Of the stable results, 1090s seem to be offering about 10MHz per extra millivolt. 1055s seem to average around 8MHz per extra millivolt.

    @PetNorth: +MHz/+mV is pretty important, but I like the other ideas.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    3,119
    Quote Originally Posted by Particle View Post
    As for names on the left, I agree. I have to scroll back and forth quite a bit myself. I'm not sure if I made column order modular or not in the software--I'll have to try it and see what happens.

    Edit: Looks like I did. Let's see how people like the left-handed names.
    Thanks, much appreciated.

    Quote Originally Posted by Particle View Post
    Anyone notice the trends for 1055 vs 1090 on +MHz/+mV? The 1090s seem to be providing better results in terms of frequency gains per extra millivolt applied. The statistic takes base frequency into account. Of the stable results, 1090s seem to be offering about 10MHz per extra millivolt. 1055s seem to average around 8MHz per extra millivolt.

    @PetNorth: +MHz/+mV is pretty important, but I like the other ideas.
    I hadn't paid attention to this portion of the chart yet. Interesting though. I will throw in the 1090T and see if I can up the stable chart.
    ~1~
    AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
    GigaByte X570 AORUS LITE
    Trident-Z 3200 CL14 16GB
    AMD Radeon VII
    ~2~
    AMD Ryzen ThreadRipper 2950x
    Asus Prime X399-A
    GSkill Flare-X 3200mhz, CAS14, 64GB
    AMD RX 5700 XT

  3. #3
    Devil kept pokin'
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    South Kakalaky
    Posts
    1,299
    Quote Originally Posted by Particle View Post
    Anyone notice the trends for 1055 vs 1090 on +MHz/+mV? The 1090s seem to be providing better results in terms of frequency gains per extra millivolt applied. The statistic takes base frequency into account. Of the stable results, 1090s seem to be offering about 10MHz per extra millivolt. 1055s seem to average around 8MHz per extra millivolt.

    @PetNorth: +MHz/+mV is pretty important, but I like the other ideas.
    Keep in mind the mobo and cooling too.
    My 1090T is eating up to 1.62 at 4.2ghz and 2.8ghz NB @ 1.265v on prime95 on a H50 at ~53c on the mobo in sig.
    As reported by cpuz and hwmonitor which I consider the standard for ocing.
    Last edited by slaveondope; 05-17-2010 at 11:29 AM.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •