cinebench 11.5

[FlanK3r]

I have a problem with R11.5...I have too many restarts and pc downs with R11 at maximum, but its strange, because my friend with 955 has same problem, but with R10. For me, it fails to R11 as much as R10, my firend has tjis problem in reverse (R10 crash and down, R11.5 OK). Help me someone?

[Zeus]

Ending the night with 7.74 points, not bad but i'd like to see 8 points.

[ReKcOlNu]

Nice going theoldtimer!

[theoldtimer]

Awsome score man whats the ambiant on the cpu?? Mine was 17c. Did you notice Thuban being a bit more resistant to the cooling?? Comparing My 965Deneb at 1.65v I could ambiant at 10-12c and load at about 22c.......With Thuban at 1.6-1.65v I was seeing 16-18c and load going to around 27c depending on the length of the test.

my result is chilled water also so If you cant be there Ill have to be taken down also.....i think chilled water and cold air is ok you can do it without any special preperation/altering to the mobo, no dry ice or ln2 or LHe is definitely in another league

thats definitely specialized cooling

Honestly I don’t have anything that reads the CPU temps outside of the Asus LCD poster and it’s all over the place. I think it reads the MB sensor. I posted earlier that I was running 4.75GHz @1.58V when benching 3D06 but after checking today it was actually 1.57V so my mistake. This Thuban doesn’t like a lot of volts so for me to clock it higher I may need to get it colder. I’m really green at testing this series Phenom II and so far I don’t know a lot about what it likes but I have found some things this Thuban doesn’t like ( at least when installed in this MB).

Nice going theoldtimer!


XtremeSystems Forums > Hardware > AMD > cinebench 11.5

Thanks ReKcOINu

[Titan7171]

Honestly I don’t have anything that reads the CPU temps outside of the Asus LCD poster and it’s all over the place. I think it reads the MB sensor. I posted earlier that I was running 4.75GHz @1.58V when benching 3D06 but after checking today it was actually 1.57V so my mistake. This Thuban doesn’t like a lot of volts so for me to clock it higher I may need to get it colder. I’m really green at testing this series Phenom II and so far I don’t know a lot about what it likes but I have found some things this Thuban doesn’t like ( at least when installed in this MB).

Thanks ReKcOINu

well what temps did your cooling system show when you were using it on Deneb??

[charged3800z24]

Nice going theoldtimer!


XtremeSystems Forums > Hardware > AMD > cinebench 11.5

Ya, very impressive run old timer. I have a tiny addition, I used the 1090t for this rin, just a smidge better then my first. Sunday, i'll have some chilled results.. nothing like Oltimer's

[richierich]

oldtimer, update your CPU-z

[theoldtimer]

oldtimer, update your CPU-z

I have version 1.54 that I use in XP and Vista I just haven't updated the one for Windows 64-bit yet. Thing is version 1.54 in XP and Vista reads the Thuban clocks just like version 1,52. Maybe we need another CPUz update for the Thuban? But yeah I do need to keep the newest one onboard for the SS's.

[theoldtimer]

Ya, very impressive run old timer. I have a tiny addition, I used the 1090t for this rin, just a smidge better then my first. Sunday, i'll have some chilled results.. nothing like Oltimer's

Nice run charged3800z24

[Zeus]

8 points is very hard for normal watercooling....



I think i will need cold ambient and 4.5GHz at least.

[I.nfraR.ed]

Yes, it's hard. You need about 4.45 - 4.46GHz to get close to the 8pts, and this is with high NB and memory at about 1800 6-6-5-17-22.
1MHz up on the fsb gave me 4480 and ofcourse higher memory frequency and NB, it was not easy to complete the run. It did it after 2-3 freezes.
4460 was fine for running it more than one time, at least I tried 2 and it was still running after that, but the result was the same (7.98)
However with cold air should be easier, and 4.5GHz+ is possible. Speaking about my chip, ofcourse, but yours seems similar.

[ReKcOlNu]

Chart Updated and moved to post 151.

[Praz]

24/7 stable settings with the Crosshair IV Formula. Processor speed is limited by my memory. I'm using 1333/9-9-9 rated memory. Currently the sticks are running 1720/8-8-8.


click for larger image

[Zeus]

Just joined the 8 points club:



Needed lower ambient temps. ~10ºC

[moorhen2]

My best run as yet,still getting the hang of this chip and board,still working on the NB.

[Crisao23]

No more MSI moorhen ?

Here's a 4.1GHz run here:

[moorhen2]

Yes i still have the two GD70's,but wanted to give the asus a go,still getting to grips with it,LOL!!!!

Nice score by the way.

[moorhen2]

Slightly better this time,NB @3ghz.

[thijs]

Any specific reason everyone is using W7 64bit here? or anyone tried to check out the difference between xp 64bit and W7 64bit? or perhaps even vista 64bit?

[I.nfraR.ed]

Slight improvement with the new bios version, which eliminated the C'n'Q problem
8.05pts 4500MHz

[Zeus]

Nice result Ivan. 4.5G Cinenbench is nothing to sneeze at for watercooling.

[FlanK3r]

AIR run Cinebench R11.5 (no cold air!)


ZEUS: now i see in your watterscore 7.74 inspiration (setings) for my AIR :-D. Tomorow il test it

[FlanK3r]

better results, but i forgot jump for NB multiplier :-/...so only 7.68 with AIR (next 7.7 will done)

[Blacklash]

Tried it on my air cooled 1055T. I'm still tuning that computer. Had the CPU less than a week.



Basic guts on that one: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T @ 4.0GHz (1.45v)|GeIL Black Dragon DDR3 1600 (4x2Gb)
ASUS Crosshair IV (AMD 890FX)|Powercolor Radeon HD 5870 1Gb (x2)|Acer GD235HZbid

[demonkevy666]

Any specific reason everyone is using W7 64bit here? or anyone tried to check out the difference between xp 64bit and W7 64bit? or perhaps even vista 64bit?

probably vista will be the lowest that's why lol
windows 7 is said to be better optimized for mutli core too.
I'm I'm betting the xp version will score highest, then windows 7 and vista will be lowest