MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 954

Thread: AMD "Thuban" Core (Phenom II X6) XS Overclocking Charts

Threaded View

  1. 05-12-2010, 05:17 AM #11
    Particle
    Particle is offline
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    Quote Originally Posted by Titan7171 View Post
    I dont understand......theres no standard here for stability. Theres people on the stable list that only did 1 hour prime this is not really going to help people.
    Prior to May 1st, there was no established standard for stability. I simply trusted people to be both honest and accurate. Someone had mentioned that I should formalize the definition so as to be more meaningful to those interpreting the charts, and I agreed. All new entries from that point (post #56+ / page 3) have proven themselves as stable via 8+ hours of y-cruncher, OCCT, LinX, Prime95, IBT, etc. I have also on occasion accepted reasonable alternatives to that requirement such as a couple days of WCG with no invalid workunits. All new submissions not providing such proof get marked as "untested" until they do even if the poster marked it as stable.

    My point is that there is certainly some credibility to the "stable" classification.

    ---

    @nex_73: I'll need you to run it over night some time (8+ hours). I know it's kind of stiff, but it's just barely enough to provide a reasonable assurance of total stability.
    Last edited by Particle; 05-12-2010 at 05:24 AM.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules