-
Since i got no reply, here's some 3D diagrams showing off the random read performance of SteveRo's Frankenstien RAID of 4x25-V, some are flashed Kingston V 40GB (therefore frankenstein).
Both sets are 4R0 x25-V ICH10R 16KB stripe, WBC off. First set is stock clocks, second is 119 PCIe and 4,8Ghz HT off on 980x. The OC makes a difference.
Comment: You'll notice 3-4 drops in performance around 8-16KB, this can happen some times, and is the reason this is only a "fairly accurate" representation of performance. For more smooth graphs, i'd use 5 data sets, discard the best and worst numbers for each datapoint, and take the average of the 3 in the middle. This however is a bit too much work for this type of "overlook".
So, here we go:
No OC:



OC:



I also have graphs comparing OC to stock, as a spoiler, the OC has a 10-25% advantage at smaller blocks, and 5-15% at larger blocks. The results are consistent, but there is a drop for OC at 16KB QD 8-16 (it happens), but this likely represents an anomaly and not the actual performance at those points.
EDIT: i saw Steve's reply too late. If a moderator sees this, pleese move this post.
For now, i'll post a link there to this post.
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks