Results 1 to 25 of 348

Thread: Vertex LE vs Crucial C300

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    513
    onex, disregard that AS SSD screenshot from legit-reviews. It's done using IDE mode, and says so in the picture. This is evident in the 4K-64Thrd numbers, wich don't scale. In AHCI or RAID mode, an x25-M G2 160GB can do 140-160MB/s read at 4K-64Thrd, and up to 80MB/s write, typical around 60MB/s. Sequential write should also be around 100MB/s, not 80.

    In reply to point 4 you listed above, we (me, and anvil) have already researched this, and found write-through give a significant IOPS boost (through lower latency overhead), while resulting in lower max bandwidth.
    EDIT: graphs
    EDIT2: to clarify the graphs. The SSDs are Intel x25-M G1, G2, and x25-V. The number of SSDs are listed first, then M/V, then G1/G2, then capacity, then write-back (WB) or write-through (WT), and lastly IOmeter file size.
    The Y-axis is bandwidth in MB/s, and the X-axis is Queue Depth.
    EDIT3: The controller used here is Anvils LSI 9260-8i. Firmware from january-february i think. So i think that makes the second firmware released.
    EDIT4: I have all the graphs in much higher resolution, and the xlsx document with all the raw data, if anybody wants the excel file, i'll post it.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	LSI 9260 random read 512b-4KB various setups.png 
Views:	467 
Size:	144.8 KB 
ID:	103549   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	LSI 9260 random read 8-64KB various setups.png 
Views:	466 
Size:	117.7 KB 
ID:	103550  
    Last edited by GullLars; 04-26-2010 at 09:54 AM.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •