MMM
Page 26 of 31 FirstFirst ... 1623242526272829 ... LastLast
Results 626 to 650 of 759

Thread: GTX 480 and GTX 470 Reviews

  1. #626
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    QLD
    Posts
    942
    Quote Originally Posted by damha View Post
    Best. Review. Ever.

    Well done xbitlabs! The first of a kind for gtx480s.

    Metro on nvidia = fail.
    To be fair, its because Metro=Fail. Atleast in its graphics engine.

  2. #627
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    3,247
    HD 5870 Crossfire CPU Scaling Performance Part II
    http://www.legionhardware.com/articl..._part_2,1.html

  3. #628
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    3,247


    GTX 480 Supports 4-way SLI?
    Soon after EVGA laid its hands on stocks of GeForce GTX 480 graphics cards, it claims from an internal test that 4-way SLI is possible on the reference design GTX 480 graphics cards. The GTX 480 was advertised to work with up to two more of its kind in 3-way SLI, in NVIDIA's presentations to the press. EVGA's feat of running four GTX 480 cards was possible on its X58 Classified 4-way SLI motherboard, which has room for four graphics cards, and a special SLI bridge that connects to four NVIDIA graphics cards with two SLI interconnect bridges each. EVGA released a special-edition GeForce GTX 285 4-way SLI ready graphics card to go with the motherboard.

    The EVGA X58 Classified 4-way SLI isn't the only motherboard to support 4-way SLI, the recently released EVGA Classified SR2 also ships with the special SLI bridge. No other motherboard vendor released a 4-way bridge, yet. EVGA demonstrated the 4-way SLI setup with a run of Unigine Heaven, although it did not give away any performance numbers.......
    http://www.techpowerup.com/119615/Ge...-way_SLI_.html

  4. #629
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,023
    Quote Originally Posted by onethreehill View Post
    I'm surprised they didn't use their watercooled ones
    i7 920 @ 4GHz 1.25v
    GTX 470 @ 859MHz 1062mv

  5. #630
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    so if a 480 is good for 3xSLI, how does 4x work? is the motherboard making a software link?

  6. #631
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,023
    Quote Originally Posted by Manicdan View Post
    so if a 480 is good for 3xSLI, how does 4x work? is the motherboard making a software link?
    the classified has some nvidia rebranded (somehow) magic included in the NF200
    i7 920 @ 4GHz 1.25v
    GTX 470 @ 859MHz 1062mv

  7. #632
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    3,247

  8. #633
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Brighton, UK
    Posts
    210
    Others who might be mainly interested in this card for Flight Simulator X (FSX) like myself.

    FSX comment

    A user here comments:

    "I cant say for the 480 but I installed my 470 last night. I played a few hours of FSX with it and I like it very much. I've seen a much better difference going from the GTX275 to the GTX470 than when I went from a 8800GT to the GTX275. No huge increase in framerate, (I would say about 10% above the GTX275) but much smoother without any stuttering. Need to do lots more testing tough".

    It's sounding very promising, soon as i get my 480 i'll give some feedback of my own.

  9. #634
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    3,247

  10. #635
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    79
    ^^^
    Maybe just me, but that smelt a bit like badly disguised Nv damage control...

  11. #636
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    355
    Quote Originally Posted by stinkas View Post
    ^^^
    Maybe just me, but that smelt a bit like badly disguised Nv damage control...
    Have to agree.

    One has to believe that with 6 months of driver development time the picture could be completely different. Min framerates seems to be the only shining light.
    ASUS Striker II Extreme 790i Bios 1202 PICS
    Q9650@4.05 (FSB 450hz X4) Linked & synced.
    Patriot Viper PC2000Mhz DDR3 4x2GB 8-8-8-22-1822
    EVGA GTX470 X2 SLI
    OS RAID 0 2X Intel X25-M 80GB 34NM Postville
    Games RAID 0 500GB X2 ES 7200 32MB Enterprise
    Silverstone TJ10 ESA
    Swiftech MCR220 & MCR120 rads
    D-TEK Fusion v2
    Black Freezer NB/SB
    EK's Acetal on Mosfets
    1/2 R3603 Tygon Tubing
    Corsair HX1000w
    SoundBlaster X-FI TITANIUM - PCIE
    Klipsch ProMedia Ultra 5.1
    Dell 3008WFP 30' @ 2560x1600
    Win7 x64 Pro


  12. #637
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Quote Originally Posted by stinkas View Post
    ^^^
    Maybe just me, but that smelt a bit like badly disguised Nv damage control...

    I must have missed something then.....


    However, the facts are quite clear: in general, ATI’s cards offer better multi GPU scaling than anything NVIDIA can currently offer.
    ATI threw a live hand grenade into the SLI party by posting performance increases that were simply jaw-dropping in nearly every respect.
    Unfortunately, that didn’t happen so as it stands we feel that spending $700 for two GTX 470 cards is a hard sell when you can buy a similarly performing solution from ATI for more than $100 less.
    It is quite evident that while the GTX 470 is a clear winner against a single HD 5850, SLI is currently struggling to mirror the downright amazing scaling that Crossfire offers.
    but the HD 5850 in Crossfire is simply too close for comfort in most cases.

  13. #638
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,870
    I was wondering wtf these guys are talking about. They obviously didn't read the article.

  14. #639
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    970
    Nvm, that doesn't make any sense.
    Last edited by flippin_waffles; 04-15-2010 at 05:20 AM.

  15. #640
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    3,247
    GTX 480 (825/1100 MHZ) vs. HD 5870 (975/1300 MHz), Overclocked Performance Analysis, Part 2
    http://alienbabeltech.com/main/?p=16997

  16. #641
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,195
    Quote Originally Posted by Trigger5521 View Post
    Have to agree.

    One has to believe that with 6 months of driver development time the picture could be completely different. Min framerates seems to be the only shining light.
    article is huge bogus first nvidias sli scaling is bad next min is more important so we should actually consider 470 sli then power cons kicks in and again we are back to 5850
    Quote Originally Posted by LesGrossman View Post
    So for the last 3 months Nvidia talked about Uniengine and then Uniengine and more Uniengine and finally Uniengine. And then takes the best 5 seconds from all the benchmark run, makes a graph and then proudly shows it everywhere.

  17. #642
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Quote Originally Posted by eric66 View Post
    article is huge bogus first nvidias sli scaling is bad next min is more important so we should actually consider 470 sli then power cons kicks in and again we are back to 5850
    As stated:

    ATI's scaling is excellent in the AVERAGE framerates. NVIDIA's scaling is merely OK for average framerates.

    ATI's scaling isn't that great for MINIMUM framerates. Yes, the overall scaling graph makes it look amazing but that's because of some incredible scaling in Far Cry 2 and BF:BC2. Other games are merely so so or take a minimum framerate hit when going to Crossfire. NVIDIA's scaling is quite good for minimums but the vast majority of its lead here is due to the GTX 470's single card minimum framerate lead.


    There are always pros and cons to every product. Simple as that.
    Last edited by SKYMTL; 04-15-2010 at 06:08 AM.

  18. #643
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Istantinople
    Posts
    1,574
    Quote Originally Posted by eric66 View Post
    article is huge bogus first nvidias sli scaling is bad next min is more important so we should actually consider 470 sli then power cons kicks in and again we are back to 5850
    I don't want to have to dissect partitions of your posts to understand them every time. How about using some punctuation marks?
    Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
    INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"

  19. #644
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,870
    Quote Originally Posted by eric66 View Post
    article is huge bogus first nvidias sli scaling is bad next min is more important so we should actually consider 470 sli then power cons kicks in and again we are back to 5850
    Fortunately, humans have well developed brains that are capable of sorting out the various nuances. It doesn't need to be black and white.

  20. #645
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    3,247
    A note on GeForce GTX 480 noise levels

    Now that GeForce GTX 400-series graphics cards are out in the wild, although in limited numbers, I should say something quickly about the main issues for which these cards, and especially the GTX 480, have gained a reputation: power, noise, and heat. I talked about this some on the latest podcast, but I don't think I communicated it all that well in the context of our GeForce GTX 480 and 470 review.

    I feel like the GTX 480 is getting a bit of a bad rap.......
    http://techreport.com/discussions.x/18774

  21. #646
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    79
    ^^^
    Now that's how PR damage control is supposed to be done.

    Has Nvidia fixed the power/heat issue with dual monitors yet? >90C at idle is a no go for me...

  22. #647
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    257
    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    As stated:

    ATI's scaling is excellent in the AVERAGE framerates. NVIDIA's scaling is merely OK for average framerates.

    ATI's scaling isn't that great for MINIMUM framerates. Yes, the overall scaling graph makes it look amazing but that's because of some incredible scaling in Far Cry 2 and BF:BC2. Other games are merely so so or take a minimum framerate hit when going to Crossfire. NVIDIA's scaling is quite good for minimums but the vast majority of its lead here is due to the GTX 470's single card minimum framerate lead.


    There are always pros and cons to every product. Simple as that.
    Great review! But how can a HD 5970 perform worse than the 5850 CFX? Like this and this

    Oh, as you've benched using FRAPS, maybe you could post some charts showing framerate fluctuation among cards tested during tests, mainly the GTX 470 SLI and HD 5850 CFX. That would be great!

    Off-topic: Not big deal but I'm think there's a typo in Test System & Setup

    OS: Windows 7 Ultimate N x64 SP1
    Last edited by japamd; 04-15-2010 at 07:48 PM.

  23. #648
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    2,207
    Quote Originally Posted by japamd View Post
    Great review! But how can a HD 5970 perform worse than the 5850 CFX? Like this and this

    Oh, as you've benched using FRAPS, maybe you could post some charts showing framerate fluctuation among cards tested during tests, mainly the GTX 470 SLI and HD 5850 CFX. That would be great!

    Off-topic: Not big deal but I'm think there's a typo in Test System & Setup

    OS: Windows 7 Ultimate N x64 SP1
    For the most part, most reviews point to 5850CF being slightly faster than the 5970.
    Core i7 920@ 4.66ghz(H2O)
    6gb OCZ platinum
    4870x2 + 4890 in Trifire
    2*640 WD Blacks
    750GB Seagate.

  24. #649
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,195
    Quote Originally Posted by tajoh111 View Post
    For the most part, most reviews point to 5850CF being slightly faster than the 5970.
    lol wut
    Quote Originally Posted by LesGrossman View Post
    So for the last 3 months Nvidia talked about Uniengine and then Uniengine and more Uniengine and finally Uniengine. And then takes the best 5 seconds from all the benchmark run, makes a graph and then proudly shows it everywhere.

  25. #650
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    India
    Posts
    394
    Epic ATI crossfire scaling

Page 26 of 31 FirstFirst ... 1623242526272829 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •