Following the trend, the name Bulldozer makes sense?
Too bad the NDA will expire in at least 1 week.
Following the trend, the name Bulldozer makes sense?
Too bad the NDA will expire in at least 1 week.
Athlon II X4 620 2.6Ghz @1.1125v | Foxconn A7DA-S (790GX) | 2x2GB OCZ Platinum DDR2 1066
| Gigabyte HD4770 | Seagate 7200.12 3x1TB | Samsung F4 HD204UI 2x2TB | LG H10N | OCZ StealthXStream 500w| Coolermaster Hyper 212+ | Compaq MV740 17"
Stock HSF: 18°C idle / 37°C load (15°C ambient)
Hyper 212+: 16°C idle / 29°C load (15°C ambient)
Why AMD Radeon rumors/leaks "are not always accurate"
Reality check
Nice, 4,2G with retail chip?
Good Cinebench performance too
I wonder how stable it is with these clocks
Keep in mind that the AMD K10.5 cores are much smaller as the the
Nehalem cores. Here a compare at 32 nm
So the Nehalem cores are 10%-15% faster in single threaded applications
and another 20%-30% through the use of Hyper Threading. They achieve
that at a cost of being 1.8 times larger.
Regards, Hans
~~~~ http://www.chip-architect.org ~~~~ http://www.physics-quest.org ~~~~
You have hit it on the head
This is my post where i was saying the same thing...
I do stand by my est. of dual llano < dual sandy bridge < quad llano < quad sandy in performance tough.
Coming Soon
Hans thanks for posting that analysis ,I've been saying similar thing for a while now in Deneb Vs Nehalem threads.Now we have your post backed up with nice images you compiled for all of us to see,good job
![]()
The two SRAM tiles of the L2 cache are below the "B" of Sandy Bridge.
They are longer but also less wide as in case of Westmere so the area
is about the same in both cases.
A good candidate for a Trace cache would be the larger square tile
below the L2 cache and above the location of the L1 instruction cache
in Westmere, which is located at the bottom edge in the middle.
Regards, Hans
A bit larger version:
![]()
~~~~ http://www.chip-architect.org ~~~~ http://www.physics-quest.org ~~~~
Bookmarks