MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 72

Thread: Some benchmarks of Thuban X6 1090T

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Lima, Peru
    Posts
    600
    Following the trend, the name Bulldozer makes sense?


    Too bad the NDA will expire in at least 1 week.
    Athlon II X4 620 2.6Ghz @1.1125v | Foxconn A7DA-S (790GX) | 2x2GB OCZ Platinum DDR2 1066
    | Gigabyte HD4770 | Seagate 7200.12 3x1TB | Samsung F4 HD204UI 2x2TB | LG H10N | OCZ StealthXStream 500w| Coolermaster Hyper 212+ | Compaq MV740 17"

    Stock HSF: 18°C idle / 37°C load (15°C ambient)
    Hyper 212+: 16°C idle / 29°C load (15°C ambient)

    Why AMD Radeon rumors/leaks "are not always accurate"
    Reality check

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    235
    Nice, 4,2G with retail chip?
    Good Cinebench performance too

    I wonder how stable it is with these clocks

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    235
    Keep in mind that the AMD K10.5 cores are much smaller as the the
    Nehalem cores. Here a compare at 32 nm



    So the Nehalem cores are 10%-15% faster in single threaded applications
    and another 20%-30% through the use of Hyper Threading. They achieve
    that at a cost of being 1.8 times larger.


    Regards, Hans

  4. #4
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Shimla , India
    Posts
    2,631
    Quote Originally Posted by Hans de Vries View Post
    Keep in mind that the AMD K10.5 cores are much smaller as the the
    Nehalem cores. Here a compare at 32 nm



    So the Nehalem cores are 10%-15% faster in single threaded applications
    and another 20%-30% through the use of Hyper Threading. They achieve
    that at a cost of being 1.8 times larger.


    Regards, Hans
    You have hit it on the head

    This is my post where i was saying the same thing...

    I do stand by my est. of dual llano < dual sandy bridge < quad llano < quad sandy in performance tough.
    Coming Soon

  5. #5
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Hans thanks for posting that analysis ,I've been saying similar thing for a while now in Deneb Vs Nehalem threads.Now we have your post backed up with nice images you compiled for all of us to see ,good job

  6. #6
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    210
    Quote Originally Posted by Hans de Vries View Post
    Keep in mind that the AMD K10.5 cores are much smaller as the the
    Nehalem cores. Here a compare at 32 nm
    Could you identify if Sandy has 2x256kB L2 instead the prior 2x128kB ? I think it's bigger but I am not sure.

    Thanks

    Opteron146
    Last edited by Opteron146; 04-14-2010 at 04:43 AM.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    235
    Quote Originally Posted by Opteron146 View Post
    Could you identify if Sandy has 2x256kB L2 instead the prior 2x128kB ? I think it's bigger but I am not sure.

    Thanks

    Opteron146
    The two SRAM tiles of the L2 cache are below the "B" of Sandy Bridge.
    They are longer but also less wide as in case of Westmere so the area
    is about the same in both cases.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dresdenboy View Post
    Thanks for that picture. I published it on my blog with some thoughts added. Besides the likely double pumped FPU there might also be signs of a trace cache (directly below the execution units). Maybe you have an even higher res SB die shot to check this.
    A good candidate for a Trace cache would be the larger square tile
    below the L2 cache and above the location of the L1 instruction cache
    in Westmere, which is located at the bottom edge in the middle.


    Regards, Hans

    A bit larger version:


  8. #8
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Berlin
    Posts
    275
    Quote Originally Posted by Hans de Vries View Post
    So the Nehalem cores are 10%-15% faster in single threaded applications
    and another 20%-30% through the use of Hyper Threading. They achieve
    that at a cost of being 1.8 times larger.
    Thanks for that picture. I published it on my blog with some thoughts added. Besides the likely double pumped FPU there might also be signs of a trace cache (directly below the execution units). Maybe you have an even higher res SB die shot to check this.
    Now on Twitter: @Dresdenboy!
    Blog: http://citavia.blog.de/

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •