Yea thats what I am guessing too @ estimated price. Thanx for the reply.Originally Posted by SKYMTL
Yea thats what I am guessing too @ estimated price. Thanx for the reply.
Xeon w3520 oc'd to 4.2ghz w/ htt enabled
Foxconn Bloodrage (G32 Bios)
2 x Nvidia 285 gtx's (overclock varies. Most recent core: 700/ shaders: 1550/ ram: 1230)
6gbs G-skill Trident ddr3 2000mhz ram @ 1604mhz (timings: 6 7 6 20 T1)
Silverstone ST1000 1000W PSU
WD RaptorX 150gb, WD 1tb, Seagate Perpendicular 320gb (non raid config)
2 x LG Sata 22x DVD Burner
Swiftech Apogee XT Extreme Water-block, Feser X-Changer 360mm Xtreme Performance Radiator, Alphacool Cape Coolplex Pro 10 External Reservior, Swiftech MCP655™ 12 VDC Pump, 3x Scythe 120mm fans, 1/2in tubing
Creative X-Fi Titanium Sound Card
Lian Li X-500 Case
And a partridge in a peared tree
Maybe the king is huge and ugly bust still:
... now that's pure power baby.
Asus' Matrix is clocked at 894MHz/4800MHz
Why did Asus leave the memory at stock speed?
not too sure, i thought the clocks were meant to be 900/4900? perhaps the mem bus on cypress can't handle anything faster?
Sweet card. Just need a waterblock or this beast. but chances are small.
ATCS 840| Core i7 920 - 4.2Ghz - H20| Corsair Dominator GT 1600Mhz 6GB| EVGA X58 Classified| GTX480 2-Way SLI| WD 640GB X2 (Raid 0)| Corsair HX1000W
Techreport tested this card against GTX 480
http://techreport.com/articles.x/18682/3
BTW Sapphire 5870 Toxic 2GB is 925MHz/5000MHz
yeah doesnt seem to get much of an increase in fps over 1gb version if u game under 2560x1600
hmm
FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
OCZ ZX 850w psu
Lian-Li Lancool K62
Samsung 830 128g
2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
Win7 Home 64bit
My Rig
excuse me, didn't see that.it's interesting to look at the far cry test in that review, even with heavy AA the matrix still takes a huge performance hit, to the point where it performs below the gtx470. i was expecting the extra vram to help cypress with AA.
EAH5870/2DIS/1GD5/V2 is on Asus website now
http://www.asus.com/product.aspx?P_I...xU0&templete=2
Do those numbers look a little wierd to anyone else? I don't recall seeing the GTX470 and GTX480 being owned in BC2 in any other reviews.
Regards,
Chris
Core i7 920 3931A318 4.4GHz 1.375vcore | EVGA X58 Classified E760 | EVGA GTX470 1280MB | Corsair Dominator GT 7-8-7-20 1688MHz | Heatkiller 3.0 CU and Feser xChanger 480 | Seasonic M12 (Soon to be replaced)
In the Anandtech review Fermi's perform below Cypresses in BC2 as well, although Anand has sweetened the situation by talking about the minimum framerates in which Fermi "tramples" Cypress.
INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
why do i feel like i see this screenshot in a few threads? and where exactly is a 2000SP ATI card this reflects? if its just suppose to be funny, whys it posted everywhereMaybe the king is huge and ugly bust still:
... now that's pure power baby.
See low FPS of Asus matrix 5870 2gb, Sapphire 5870 Toxic 2GB will decrease the difference between it and gtx 480 the Metro 2033 tessellation score is interesting 3fps difference
Coming Soon
When will the card get reviewed? I want to see how well it performs. Hmm, looks like the tech report article reviewing it.
Last edited by Eastcoasthandle; 04-02-2010 at 06:49 AM.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
MATRIX 5870/2DIS/2GD5 I just saw it on the Asus website now
http://www.asus.com/product.aspx?P_I...C5U&templete=2
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814121374
$430 + shipping
PC-A04 | Z68MA-ED55 | 2500k | 2200+ XPG | 7970 | 180g 520 | 2x1t Black | X3 1000w
1GB and stock clocks ^^^^^ , the card on newegg . and it looks a little bit different
That one
http://www.asus.com/product.aspx?P_I...xU0&templete=2
Last edited by kemo; 04-03-2010 at 12:54 PM.
Intel Core I7 920 @ 3.8GHZ 1.28V (Core Contact Freezer)
Asus X58 P6T
6GB OCZ Gold DDR3-1600MHZ 8-8-8-24
XFX HD5870
WD 1TB Black HD
Corsair 850TX
Cooler Master HAF 922
yeah if that was the 2GB matrix for $430, i would have wet myself and clicked the buy button, then go change my underwear
the asus eyefinity card looks sexy, carbon fiber stickers!
any reviews of the Asus V2 yet?
FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
OCZ ZX 850w psu
Lian-Li Lancool K62
Samsung 830 128g
2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
Win7 Home 64bit
My Rig
I remember when the 5870 first came out, there were a truckload of people crying: "WTF 1GB ONLY?!?! WTF WE WANT 2GB!!!! OMFGZZZZ MEMORY BOTTLENECK OMFG!!!!"
has anyone properly done a test of 1GB vs 2GB 5870s on a modded crysis with texture packs included?
its about future proofing, the idea that my 1GB card will last forever means we hit a very nice brick wall in technology, which i pray is not the case. i dont plan to spend 400-500$ on a card i will only keep for 1 year. but if an extra 50$ of memory makes it last 3 years, thats a pretty good upgrade. and can you imagine how much memory will be standard in 2012, or how games will be able to utilize it?
+this current games don't push it i agree but special mods do and there are plenty of themh
Stock clocks dont really matter on Asus cards as overclocking is covered by the warranty anyway, and they offer voltage tweak and unlocked OC limits, whereas other brands dont (except MSI).
i love how everyone is blabbering that 480 has awesome dx11 power unfortunantly in real games its nearly on par with 5870
Many of the DX11 titles currently available were developed using ATi hardware and capabilities since nVidia was just a little late to the party. In upcoming games you'll be sure to see much higher levels of tessellation available in game settings which Fermi cards can utilize to greatly enhance image quality while keeping playable frame rates.i love how everyone is blabbering that 480 has awesome dx11 power unfortunantly in real games its nearly on par with 5870
Yes... I know it's not a game, but nobody can deny how powerful Fermi is when it comes to levels of tessellation much higher than currently used in retail games.
As a current owner of a GTX285 and former owner of HD4870, I'm definitely going to wait for both companies to refresh their current cards. nV definitely needs to work out its heat and power issues through a refinement of TSMC's process... and I'm sure a more mature .40nm process would be of benefit to ATi and allow for less heat and higher clocks.
"If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government"
-- Alexander Hamilton
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks