MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 3051

Thread: The Fermi Thread - Part 3

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    1,886
    Quote Originally Posted by ***Deimos*** View Post
    Just when you thought your 850W PSU was enough for your stock PC:


    It gets worse:


    Power consumption figures in benchmarks can sometimes be quite revealing:
    Its probable that the 5870 isn't using a good portion of its resources in Unengine Heaven.
    Whether its poor driver optimization or design limitation is unknown.

    Surely with crazy high power output, the GTX480 is being used 100% by driver!?
    Its very possible, like i7/Phenom, that typical scenarios use much less power than special case (recall how AMD advertised "typical" not "max" Phenom power)
    nVidia might then purposefully slows down shader execution in Fermi in these special non-game scenarios to ensure advertised 250W spec.
    *censored* ...... wow..... seriously 850watt for sli 480gtx ??? how much watt does the mobo and cpu get into those figures????

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,125
    Quote Originally Posted by Sn0wm@n View Post
    *censored* ...... wow..... seriously 850watt for sli 480gtx ??? how much watt does the mobo and cpu get into those figures????
    Well you can subtract 851-479 = 372W more for the extra card, assuming nothing else was changed. That's at the wall of course... taking a 0.85 efficiency, that's 316W (at 0.80 efficiency, its 298W). So either way, the cards are drawing WAY over the 250W Nvidia advertised.

    Holy moly!

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    162
    Quote Originally Posted by zerazax View Post
    Well you can subtract 851-479 = 372W more for the extra card, assuming nothing else was changed. That's at the wall of course... taking a 0.85 efficiency, that's 316W (at 0.80 efficiency, its 298W). So either way, the cards are drawing WAY over the 250W Nvidia advertised.

    Holy moly!
    give or take that can be a fair assumption.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,656
    Quote Originally Posted by zerazax View Post
    Well you can subtract 851-479 = 372W more for the extra card, assuming nothing else was changed. That's at the wall of course... taking a 0.85 efficiency, that's 316W (at 0.80 efficiency, its 298W). So either way, the cards are drawing WAY over the 250W Nvidia advertised.

    Holy moly!
    Kind of an eye opener thats for sure, too bad TSMC doesn't have a high-k metal gate process on 40nm, 28nm should be high-k metal gate or at least be an option with TSMC later this year.

    I'm wondering how much of a role leakage may be contributing with the high transistor count.
    Work Rig: Asus x58 P6T Deluxe, i7 950 24x166 1.275v, BIX2/GTZ/D5
    3x2048 GSkill pi Black DDR3 1600, Quadro 600
    PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 810

    Game Rig: Asus x58 P6T, i7 970 24x160 1.2v HT on, TRUE120
    3x4096 GSkill DDR3 1600, PNY 660ti
    PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 830

    AMD Rig: Biostar TA790GX A2+, x4 940 16x200, stock hsf
    2x2gb Patriot DDR2 800, PowerColor 4850
    Corsair VX450

  5. #5
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,313
    Quote Originally Posted by highoctane View Post
    Kind of an eye opener thats for sure, too bad TSMC doesn't have a high-k metal gate process on 40nm, 28nm should be high-k metal gate or at least be an option with TSMC later this year.

    I'm wondering how much of a role leakage may be contributing with the high transistor count.
    TMSC 40nm is NOT the problem. Somehow magically AMD made a DUAL-GPU card with less power and lower idle power.

    Last time I checked, 5970=4BT. GTX=3BT. 4>3 isn't it?

    The problem is the design. AMD put a LOT of focus on maintaining 4870's very high performance/TDP. nVidia was focused on top performance irregardless of means.

    Its exactly the same way P4 fell from grace at 3.8Ghz.

    (this is why Intel doesn't just hope for 1%performance/1%power, but requires it and much higher)
    Now, where are all those Dual-Fermi folks? or the Fermi laptop weirdos.. I wanna see them spin their way out.

    Quote Originally Posted by Blacky View Post
    Nvidia partners prolly going nerdrage right now for this massive fail, after waiting so long for this...
    Who wants to be the first to offer 5 year warranty.. anybody? What about 3 year? Any takers? EVGA? BFG? They will provide SOME warranty (and house fire insurance), right?

    Quote Originally Posted by tomshardware
    Radeon HD 5870’s 27W idle board rating, achieved in part by clocking its GPU down to 157 MHz and its GDDR5 memory to 300 MHz. Nvidia goes even further, dropping clocks to 50 MHz core, 67 MHz memory (270 MT/s data rate), and 100 MHz for the shaders. Nvidia doesn’t cite its idle board power, but an educated guess would still put the GeForce GTX 480 around 60W at those frequencies
    Code:
    idle	core	mem	shader	power
    5870	157	300	157	27
    480	50	67	100	60!?
    Last edited by ***Deimos***; 03-26-2010 at 10:31 PM.

    24/7: A64 3000+ (\_/) @2.4Ghz, 1.4V
    1 GB OCZ Gold (='.'=) 240 2-2-2-5
    Giga-byte NF3 (")_(") K8NSC-939
    XFX 6800 16/6 NV5 @420/936, 1.33V

  6. #6
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,656
    Quote Originally Posted by ***Deimos*** View Post
    Who wants to be the first to offer 5 year warranty.. anybody? What about 3 year? Any takers? EVGA? BFG? They will provide SOME warranty (and house fire insurance), right?
    Not sure about the others but PNY offers a lifetime warranty with registration.

    http://www3.pny.com/GTX-470-1280MB-PCIe-P2876C434.aspx
    http://www3.pny.com/GTX-480-1536MB-PCIe-P2877C434.aspx

    EDIT: EVGA offers lifetime was well with registration.
    Last edited by highoctane; 03-26-2010 at 11:55 PM.
    Work Rig: Asus x58 P6T Deluxe, i7 950 24x166 1.275v, BIX2/GTZ/D5
    3x2048 GSkill pi Black DDR3 1600, Quadro 600
    PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 810

    Game Rig: Asus x58 P6T, i7 970 24x160 1.2v HT on, TRUE120
    3x4096 GSkill DDR3 1600, PNY 660ti
    PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 830

    AMD Rig: Biostar TA790GX A2+, x4 940 16x200, stock hsf
    2x2gb Patriot DDR2 800, PowerColor 4850
    Corsair VX450

  7. #7
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,313
    Quote Originally Posted by Sn0wm@n View Post
    *censored* ...... wow..... seriously 850watt for sli 480gtx ??? how much watt does the mobo and cpu get into those figures????
    Around 150W for everything in the system except video cards.
    This is based on the total power output of 57xx and 58xx.
    +/- maybe 20W.

    Thus, the two 480s are sharing 700W between each other. Maybe 20-40W for error and another 20W for extra power of SLI chipset... that's still 640W!

    Its impossible to justify how the system could possibly use 350W, given advertised 250Wx2.

    The system by itself can't use more than 226W which already included a 5750.
    850W probably because EVERYTHING - PSU, CPU, DRAM, HDD, and ofcourse 480s - are LESS EFFICIENT because of VERY HIGH TEMPS caused by the 480s. I would never store critical data on hard drives in there.

    Quote Originally Posted by zerazax View Post
    147W?

    Nah, it seems to be ~100W or so across the various reviews
    yes GTX480 is about 100W (45%) more than 5870.
    The only card worse in perf/Watt is the GTX295.. sorry GTX480 #2 place.
    Last edited by ***Deimos***; 03-26-2010 at 10:14 PM.

    24/7: A64 3000+ (\_/) @2.4Ghz, 1.4V
    1 GB OCZ Gold (='.'=) 240 2-2-2-5
    Giga-byte NF3 (")_(") K8NSC-939
    XFX 6800 16/6 NV5 @420/936, 1.33V

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •