Well you can subtract 851-479 = 372W more for the extra card, assuming nothing else was changed. That's at the wall of course... taking a 0.85 efficiency, that's 316W (at 0.80 efficiency, its 298W). So either way, the cards are drawing WAY over the 250W Nvidia advertised.
Holy moly!
Kind of an eye opener thats for sure, too bad TSMC doesn't have a high-k metal gate process on 40nm, 28nm should be high-k metal gate or at least be an option with TSMC later this year.
I'm wondering how much of a role leakage may be contributing with the high transistor count.
Work Rig: Asus x58 P6T Deluxe, i7 950 24x166 1.275v, BIX2/GTZ/D5
3x2048 GSkill pi Black DDR3 1600, Quadro 600
PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 810
Game Rig: Asus x58 P6T, i7 970 24x160 1.2v HT on, TRUE120
3x4096 GSkill DDR3 1600, PNY 660ti
PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 830
AMD Rig: Biostar TA790GX A2+, x4 940 16x200, stock hsf
2x2gb Patriot DDR2 800, PowerColor 4850
Corsair VX450
TMSC 40nm is NOT the problem. Somehow magically AMD made a DUAL-GPU card with less power and lower idle power.
Last time I checked, 5970=4BT. GTX=3BT. 4>3 isn't it?
The problem is the design. AMD put a LOT of focus on maintaining 4870's very high performance/TDP. nVidia was focused on top performance irregardless of means.
Its exactly the same way P4 fell from grace at 3.8Ghz.
(this is why Intel doesn't just hope for 1%performance/1%power, but requires it and much higher)
Now, where are all those Dual-Fermi folks? or the Fermi laptop weirdos.. I wanna see them spin their way out.
Who wants to be the first to offer 5 year warranty.. anybody? What about 3 year? Any takers? EVGA? BFG? They will provide SOME warranty (and house fire insurance), right?
Originally Posted by tomshardware
Code:idle core mem shader power 5870 157 300 157 27 480 50 67 100 60!?
Last edited by ***Deimos***; 03-26-2010 at 10:31 PM.
24/7: A64 3000+ (\_/) @2.4Ghz, 1.4V
1 GB OCZ Gold (='.'=) 240 2-2-2-5
Giga-byte NF3 (")_(") K8NSC-939
XFX 6800 16/6 NV5 @420/936, 1.33V
Not sure about the others but PNY offers a lifetime warranty with registration.
http://www3.pny.com/GTX-470-1280MB-PCIe-P2876C434.aspx
http://www3.pny.com/GTX-480-1536MB-PCIe-P2877C434.aspx
EDIT: EVGA offers lifetime was well with registration.
Last edited by highoctane; 03-26-2010 at 11:55 PM.
Work Rig: Asus x58 P6T Deluxe, i7 950 24x166 1.275v, BIX2/GTZ/D5
3x2048 GSkill pi Black DDR3 1600, Quadro 600
PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 810
Game Rig: Asus x58 P6T, i7 970 24x160 1.2v HT on, TRUE120
3x4096 GSkill DDR3 1600, PNY 660ti
PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 830
AMD Rig: Biostar TA790GX A2+, x4 940 16x200, stock hsf
2x2gb Patriot DDR2 800, PowerColor 4850
Corsair VX450
Around 150W for everything in the system except video cards.
This is based on the total power output of 57xx and 58xx.
+/- maybe 20W.
Thus, the two 480s are sharing 700W between each other. Maybe 20-40W for error and another 20W for extra power of SLI chipset... that's still 640W!
Its impossible to justify how the system could possibly use 350W, given advertised 250Wx2.
The system by itself can't use more than 226W which already included a 5750.
850W probably because EVERYTHING - PSU, CPU, DRAM, HDD, and ofcourse 480s - are LESS EFFICIENT because of VERY HIGH TEMPS caused by the 480s. I would never store critical data on hard drives in there.
yes GTX480 is about 100W (45%) more than 5870.
The only card worse in perf/Watt is the GTX295.. sorry GTX480 #2 place.
Last edited by ***Deimos***; 03-26-2010 at 10:14 PM.
24/7: A64 3000+ (\_/) @2.4Ghz, 1.4V
1 GB OCZ Gold (='.'=) 240 2-2-2-5
Giga-byte NF3 (")_(") K8NSC-939
XFX 6800 16/6 NV5 @420/936, 1.33V
Bookmarks