MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 98

Thread: Fermi delayed again !

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    866
    Quote Originally Posted by N19h7m4r3 View Post
    True that type of benchmark is usually the best, but most places don't put up the video tests.

    Also I personally know people that swear by Max fps, which I just find weird.

    The same applies for Avg fps, i'd rather have a card that spits out decent and consistant min fps that one that' Max i very high, but min dips far to low to often.
    entirely true, but, and before i say this im not one of those people that swear on max fps, but, usually, and im not saying even close to all the time, the card with the higher max (or max average) fps, usually does well with minimum as well, maybe 60/40, still buying based on minimum average is the way to go.

    I wish every GFX card review, had a minimum average, an average, and a maximum average.
    minimum/maximum average meaning, when it dips, or raises, how long, and how often.
    i guess thats what the average is judging, but a massive number for a small time, can manipulate that, and vice versa.
    I want details dangit!
    Last edited by Decami; 03-26-2010 at 02:38 AM.
    This post above was delayed 90 times by Nvidia. Cause that's their thing, thats what they do.
    This Announcement of the delayed post above has been brought to you by Nvidia Inc.

    RIGGY
    case:Antec 1200
    MB: XFX Nforce 750I SLI 72D9
    CPU:E8400 (1651/4x9) 3712.48
    MEM:4gb Gskill DDR21000 (5-5-5-15)
    GPU: NVIDIA GTX260 EVGA SSC (X2 in SLI) both 652/1403
    PS:Corsair 650TX
    OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ultimate
    --Cooling--
    5x120mm 1x200mm
    Zalman 9700LED
    Displays: Samsung LN32B650/Samsung 2243BWX/samsung P2350


Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •