Page 39 of 123 FirstFirst ... 29363738394041424989 ... LastLast
Results 951 to 975 of 3051

Thread: The Fermi Thread - Part 3

  1. #951
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,374
    Quote Originally Posted by Gilhooley View Post
    There seems to be a lot of confusion about computer wattage. PSUs ain't 100% effective. Current new models have 80plus certs and a few with more, but thats best case scenarios. 80% efficiency is a realistic value and for you in 110V land maybe a little less.

    This means that if you measure at the wall a 100W draw you're using 80W, the rest is heat in the PSU. This also means that a rated 500W PSU at maximum load will draw 625W from the wall..

    So when you see statements like "the system draws 450W" which alludes to a killawatt measurement, that's only the maximum for a 360W PSU.
    Many sites will factor that in...

  2. #952
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    1,886
    Quote Originally Posted by Teemax View Post
    Companies don't really price their product based on production cost. They price it on how much the market is willing to pay

    its a bit of both ... what they want to sell it for to make the process lucrative + what people will pay ... they usually go with an average between both ......

  3. #953
    Xtreme Member Gilhooley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    164
    Quote Originally Posted by xVeinx View Post
    Many sites will factor that in...
    And some will measure on the MB for even better values. But I think that 9 of 10 sites doesn't..
    Q9650@4000 - Apogee GTX, Gigabyte X48-DS5, 8GB Corsair Dominator XMS2-8500, GTX480 El cheapo Asetek block, Audiophile 192 + Adam-A7, Win7

  4. #954
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    336
    you gotta be an electrical engineer to figure this stuff out

  5. #955
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,970
    Quote Originally Posted by Gilhooley View Post
    There seems to be a lot of confusion about computer wattage. PSUs ain't 100% effective. Current new models have 80plus certs and a few with more, but thats best case scenarios. 80% efficiency is a realistic value and for you in 110V land maybe a little less.

    This means that if you measure at the wall a 100W draw you're using 80W, the rest is heat in the PSU. This also means that a rated 500W PSU at maximum load will draw 625W from the wall..

    So when you see statements like "the system draws 450W" which alludes to a killawatt measurement, that's only the maximum for a 360W PSU.
    Yeah, I 100% wigged out and forgot about that.... .

  6. #956
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    23
    From Fellix,

    OK, some first hand info, but my source is still under NDA, so not much in-depth details.

    GTX470 is ~10% faster than stock HD5870, benched in Crysis.
    The noise level under load is similar to GTX285 -- noticeable but not irritating.
    Bench setting is unclear...

  7. #957
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by Oj101 View Post
    OEMs requested the 3xx rename.
    that doesnt explain why they renamed their retail products though
    and it doesnt explain why they named the last G92 based OEM part GTS150 while the retail cards were called GTS250... same specs, same clocks, same chip... but sure, it was those oh so evil oems that push nvidia to rename their cards to make them sound more powerful

    Quote Originally Posted by WeiT.235 View Post
    From Fellix,
    Bench setting is unclear...
    thx
    no big difference though, 10% more or less... i doubt itll make a difference.
    whether you play on a system with a 5870 or gtx470 or gtx480... it should be pretty much the same... unless you game at ultra high res, then the 480 might actually make a difference compared to the 470 and 5870... cant wait for reviews to check that

    oh and about the 10% more perf for double the watts...
    im not saying i believe it, i have no idea... but i believe he meant actual wattage of 5870s is around 130W and actual wattage of 480s is 250W, so then its ALMOST double the wattage... IF 480s are really that power hungry is another question...

    since their tdp was rumored to be close to 300W first, that might have been an electrical worst case scenario which was very unrealistic, so nvidia lowered it to a more realistic max tdp value... but i dont think the 480 comes close to 250W under gaming load... id say 200W max when playing games, and a 5870 is probably around 140W max when playing games.

  8. #958
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Istantinople
    Posts
    1,574
    saaya: I think you missed that the guy reported %10 better perf. in Crysis of 470, not 480...

    However, this still might be the 2560 + 4xAA case which says little...
    Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
    INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"

  9. #959
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    23
    must be the most power hungry config. ever...


  10. #960
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    23
    Quote Originally Posted by annihilat0r View Post
    saaya: I think you missed that the guy reported %10 better perf. in Crysis of 470, not 480...

    However, this still might be the 2560 + 4xAA case which says little...
    agree, I guess the 5870 1g must be included for the bench, instead of 2gb version. In high setting like 2506x1600 in crysis, 1g version is easy to use out of the buffer.

  11. #961
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    1,886
    we might see 90 pages before the 6th of april LOLL

  12. #962
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Istantinople
    Posts
    1,574
    Quote Originally Posted by Sn0wm@n View Post
    we might see 90 pages before the 6th of april LOLL
    yeah but at least reviewers have the cards now, any info leaking should be close to correct
    Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
    INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"

  13. #963
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    1,886
    Quote Originally Posted by annihilat0r View Post
    yeah but at least reviewers have the cards now, any info leaking should be close to correct

    indeed..... we should prepare the anti depression med for the nvidia fanboys .....

  14. #964
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    4,308
    It's like only 3 days left (it's past midnight here) and there's no comprehensive leaked stuff, yea the most important specs are revealed but nothing besides this, no trustworthy benchmarks etc. I must say this is very impressively kept secret. GT200 was kept quite secret until like a week beforehand, things started leaking out, benchmarks etc but even 3 days before fermi stuff is meant to be released no signs of real benchmarks etc. Congrats nvidia to this if nothing else.
    Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs

    If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place

  15. #965
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    336
    Quote Originally Posted by RPGWiZaRD View Post
    It's like only 3 days left (it's past midnight here) and there's no comprehensive leaked stuff, yea the most important specs are revealed but nothing besides this, no trustworthy benchmarks etc. I must say this is very impressively kept secret. GT200 was kept quite secret until like a week beforehand, things started leaking out, benchmarks etc but even 3 days before fermi stuff is meant to be released no signs of real benchmarks etc. Congrats nvidia to this if nothing else.
    that's probably because no one is excited about the performance

  16. #966
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    244
    Quote Originally Posted by LordEC911 View Post
    Again... that is supposedly a picture of GT215.
    It is GF100 A3,leaked by a chinese employee of Giada.



    Last edited by mindfury; 03-22-2010 at 03:34 PM.

  17. #967
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,313
    Your spouse/chiropractor laughed at you when you spent $400 on it.. now who's laughing!
    1500W. Let that sink in.

    mobo = 6pin = 75W, 8pin = 150W.
    GTX480 = mobo + 6pin + 8pin = 300W max
    GTX460 = mobo + 6pin + 6pin = 225W max

    For 3x SLI need: 6 PCIE connectors, and 675-900W for video cards alone.
    There are about a dozen 1100-1200W PSU on the market - which suddenly dont look so excessive. But most only have enough 6/8 pin PCIE connectors for 2 x GTX480 or 3x GTX470.

    Newegg has three PSU with 8 PCIE connectors, and one amazing PSU has 4x 6pin, 4x 8pin . Sadly Antec only has 1200W - hardly enough for OC CPU AND Triple or Quad SLI.

    PS: If they add even metal bars/rods along top of heatsink, it will leave the same marks as grill on your hamburgers

    24/7: A64 3000+ (\_/) @2.4Ghz, 1.4V
    1 GB OCZ Gold (='.'=) 240 2-2-2-5
    Giga-byte NF3 (")_(") K8NSC-939
    XFX 6800 16/6 NV5 @420/936, 1.33V

  18. #968
    NooB MOD
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    5,799
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    that doesnt explain why they renamed their retail products though
    and it doesnt explain why they named the last G92 based OEM part GTS150 while the retail cards were called GTS250... same specs, same clocks, same chip... but sure, it was those oh so evil oems that push nvidia to rename their cards to make them sound more powerful
    Hehe, you missed that I was replying to the guy I quoted where he said OEMs are getting irritated with the renames. I simply pointed out that no they're not, they REQUESTED some of the renames to differenciate between retail and OEM channels.
    Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
    Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!


    Quote Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides View Post
    Intel is about to get athlon'd
    Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v

  19. #969
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by annihilat0r View Post
    saaya: I think you missed that the guy reported %10 better perf. in Crysis of 470, not 480...
    However, this still might be the 2560 + 4xAA case which says little...
    no, i didnt miss that...
    but whats the difference between a 5870, 5850, gtx470 and gtx480?
    unless you play at super high res you wouldnt be able to tell them apart by playing games on those rigs... same res, same aa, roughly same fps and min fps...

    so one card is 5% faster here, another 10% there... that doesnt really make a difference, does it? i hope reviews will have oced vs oced comparisons as well, that would be interesting... especially for the 470...

  20. #970
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    FYI

    NVIDIA will be officially launching the GF100 graphics cards at PAX East 2010. We’d like to take this opportunity to get together with some of our biggest fans. Here’s your chance to meet some of your fellow Club SLI members as well as some of the folks from NVIDIA.

    http://surveys.nvidia.com/index.jsp?...ced6122cfa2c4a
    headsup for all the fermi lovers out there

  21. #971
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,970
    Quote Originally Posted by WeiT.235 View Post
    From Fellix,



    Bench setting is unclear...
    Nice if true, 10% faster on the 470 over a 5870 . Will be interesting to see overclocked results especially , I run 2560x1600 and like 2-4x AA so it is important to me.

  22. #972
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    1,264
    Quote Originally Posted by GoldenTiger View Post
    Nice if true, 10% faster on the 470 over a 5870 . Will be interesting to see overclocked results especially , I run 2560x1600 and like 2-4x AA so it is important to me.
    If it is true at anything less than 1920x1200 8xAA very high settings, I'll be impressed. Otherwise Again we've already seen the leaks with the 470 pulling ahead at 25600x1600 4-8xAA but clearly this is a biased scenario as half the time the game wasnt playble (or just barely) on either card despite the extra video memory ( in other words 10%+ crap still is crap ) I don't have many doubts that the 470 will do better at 25600x1600 on average however I still think it won't be enough as this resolution is really multi gpu territory (unless one stays clear of current titles anyways ). I don't see the point pairing a ultra highend display with a non ultra highend gpu setup ( not to say 5870/470s aren't highend, they just aren't ultra high end solutions )
    Last edited by Chickenfeed; 03-22-2010 at 03:55 PM.
    Feedanator 7.0
    CASE:R5|PSU:850G2|CPU:i7 6850K|MB:x99 Ultra|RAM:8x4 2666|GPU:980TI|SSD:BPX256/Evo500|SOUND:2i4/HS8
    LCD:XB271HU|OS:Win10|INPUT:G900/K70 |HS/F:H115i

  23. #973
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Miltown, Wisconsin
    Posts
    353
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    no, i didnt miss that...
    but whats the difference between a 5870, 5850, gtx470 and gtx480?
    unless you play at super high res you wouldnt be able to tell them apart by playing games on those rigs... same res, same aa, roughly same fps and min fps...

    Just ask my wife what a inch or two of e-peen can do. Its all about girth.. sorry, I mean bandwith.

    Honestly, its all about the same with these new cards. Whatever works for your res is the best choice. My 5850 maxes out almost everything but crysis at 1080p. I cant really ask for much more for just gaming. I think it was one of the best purchases I have ever made. I would wait till a fermi refresh honestly, this first batch looks horrid. I predict a fermi refresh asap, fermi just isnt profitable in its current state.

    I have a hard time spending more than 250$ on a piece of hardware I know is going to be outdated and worthless in 6 months. I am way happier spending less and upgrading more often.
    Pc gaming is dying fast, the consoles and ports rule the market. ACCEPT IT
    Quote Originally Posted by ***Deimos*** View Post
    WARNING GTX480 - may cause dizziness, blurred vision, dry mouth, dehydration, shortness of breath, headaches, naussea, explosive diahrea


    Foxconn Bloodrage P11 ( 2.1 SLIC MOD )
    Corei7 980 (3118B583) 4.2ghz 24-7 with stock vcore
    2x8GB PNY 1600c9 @ 1600mhz 9-9-9-24-1T
    nVidia GTX 770
    256gb OCZ Vertex4 FW 1.5
    2TB Green Barracuda
    Antec HCG-620w PSU
    Corsair H50 ( Sucks Hairry Balls IMHO )
    Coolermaster Storm Sniper Black Custom Sleeved
    3 x Dell U2410 H-IPS 1920x1200 Surround
    Windows 7 x64 Ultimate




  24. #974
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,313
    Quote Originally Posted by ElSel10 View Post
    GTX480 is $499, the 470 is $349.

    what has nVidia done for you in 2 years?
    Code:
    	$200 	$250 	$300 	$350 	$500 
    Jun-08				GTX 260	GTX 280
    Jul-08				GTX 260	GTX 280
    Aug-08				GTX 260	GTX 280
    Sep-08				GTX 260	GTX 280
    Oct-08				GTX 260	GTX 280
    Nov-08				GTX 260	GTX 280
    Dec-08				GTX 260	GTX 280
    Jan-09		GTX 260		GTX285	eol
    Feb-09		GTX 260		GTX285	GTX 295
    Mar-09		GTX 260		GTX285	GTX 295
    Apr-09	GTX 260	GTX275		GTX285	GTX 295
    May-09	GTX 260	GTX275		GTX285	GTX 295
    Jun-09	GTX 260	GTX275		GTX285	GTX 295
    Jul-09	GTX 260	GTX275		GTX285	GTX 295
    Aug-09	GTX 260	GTX275		GTX285	GTX 295
    Sep-09	GTX 260	GTX275		eol	eol?
    Oct-09	GTX 260	GTX275		eol	eol?
    Nov-09	GTX 260	eol		eol	
    Dec-09	GTX 260	eol		eol	
    Jan-10	GTX 260	eol		eol	
    Feb-10	GTX 260	eol		eol	
    Mar-10	eol?	eol			
    Apr-10	nothin	nothin	nothin	GTX470	GTX 480
    May-10	nothin	nothin	nothin	GTX470	GTX 480
    5 price brackets. 2 years. 5 products. 1 chip = whole lotta slackers

    CONTRAST to AMD. Unless I'm mistaken, you can still get rock bottom priced $100 4850's and $150 4870. In contrast, hard finding anything beyond GTX260 from nVidia for MANY MONTHS, and certainly nowhere remotely near $100.
    Code:
    	$200 	$250 	$300 	$350 	$500 
    Jun-08	4850		4870		
    Jul-08	4850		4870		4870x2
    Aug-08	4850		4870		4870x2
    Sep-08	4850		4870		4870x2
    Oct-08	4850		4870		4870x2
    Nov-08	4850		4870		4870x2
    Dec-08	4850	4870			4870x2
    Jan-09	4850	4870			4870x2
    Feb-09	4850	4870			4870x2
    Mar-09	4850	4870			4870x2
    Apr-09	4870	4890			
    May-09	4870	4890			
    Jun-09	4870	4890			
    Jul-09	4890	yeah, we're practically giving away those 4890s			
    Aug-09	4890	yeah, we're practically giving away those 4890s			
    Sep-09	4890		5850	5870	
    Oct-09	5770		5850	5870	5870x2
    Nov-09	5770		5850	5870	5870x2
    Dec-09	5770		5850	5870	5870x2
    Jan-10	5770		5850	5870	5870x2
    Feb-10	5770	5830	5850	5870	5870x2
    Mar-10	5770	5830	5850	5870	5870x2
    Notice full lineup. No gaps. Notice how far prices fall yet availability remains.

    EDIT: These are very rough approximations based on MSRP.
    Notice not counting 2 different GTX260 types for nVidia
    For AMD, not counting, HD4770, HD4830, HD4870 1GB, HD4850x2 or 5870 Eyeinfinity edition.

    Just like 4870/4890, 1 year from now, you will be able to buy a 5850 or 5870 for less than $200... Fermi - only in a liquidation sale
    Last edited by ***Deimos***; 03-22-2010 at 04:21 PM.

    24/7: A64 3000+ (\_/) @2.4Ghz, 1.4V
    1 GB OCZ Gold (='.'=) 240 2-2-2-5
    Giga-byte NF3 (")_(") K8NSC-939
    XFX 6800 16/6 NV5 @420/936, 1.33V

  25. #975
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Bloomfield
    Posts
    1,968
    since when did all of the 200 series reach eol?

Page 39 of 123 FirstFirst ... 29363738394041424989 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •