Last edited by trueg50; 03-10-2010 at 03:47 PM.
Core I7 920 4.2 ghz (21x200) 1.35 volts / Asus P6T / Corsair XMS 1333mhz @ 1600mhz / EVGA GTX 285 SSC (724 core/1634 shaders / 1508 mem) / Modified ThermalTake Armor
Swiftech Apogee, MCW-60, Swiftech 655, Black Ice GTX 360
finally
is that only 3 phase power per-cpu? (on shown board))
PC-A04 | Z68MA-ED55 | 2500k | 2200+ XPG | 7970 | 180g 520 | 2x1t Black | X3 1000w
Well as long as the components of the phase are up to it. The reason we look down upon smaller phases is the complete garbage used by standard mobo makes till they start bragging about the overclocking.
Maybe, you wouldn't be using a bottom barrel Powmax power supply with that thing though. The juice powering a system like that would be coming from a true sine wave UPS into a power supply that's cleaner than a spit shined and polished bald head.
Another wide CPU, huh?
Interesting, not all the elements are under the heat spreader...
Donate to XS forumsOriginally Posted by jayhall0315
this may sound a bit noobish but where are the memory slots? is it on another add on board?
I believe that each of the PCI looking slots next to each socket are for memory bank riser boards
Main-- i7-980x @ 4.5GHZ | Asus P6X58D-E | HD5850 @ 950core 1250mem | 2x160GB intel x25-m G2's |
Wife-- i7-860 @ 3.5GHz | Gigabyte P55M-UD4 | HD5770 | 80GB Intel x25-m |
HTPC1-- Q9450 | Asus P5E-VM | HD3450 | 1TB storage
HTPC2-- QX9750 | Asus P5E-VM | 1TB storage |
Car-- T7400 | Kontron mini-ITX board | 80GB Intel x25-m | Azunetech X-meridian for sound |
socket 1567
Next year, Intel bring socket 2011 for sever segment !
Now we buy Nehalem EX system, next year we can't update CPU from Nehalem to Sandy Bridge !
When AMD had 64-bit and Intel had only 32-bit, they tried to tell the world there was no need for 64-bit. Until they got 64-bit.
When AMD had IMC and Intel had FSB, they told the world "there is plenty of life left in the FSB" (actual quote, and yes, they had *math* to show it had more bandwidth). Until they got an IMC.
When AMD had dual core and Intel had single core, they told the world that consumers don't need multi core. Until they got dual core.
When intel was using MCM, they said it was a better solution than native dies. Until they got native dies. (To be fair, we knocked *unconnected* MCM, and still do, we never knocked MCM as a technology, so hold your flames.)by John Fruehe
socket 2012: the end of the line for CPU performance as we know it?
All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.
Thanks, I was wondering where the memory was myself..
Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
The XS WCG team needs your support.
A good project with good goals.
Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.
I'm not sure if Nehalem ex will support it, but Intel showed a technology that allows them to shut down some of their memory risers.
The system had 512 GB of RAM in 8 memory risers.
They shut down half the ram and decreased power consumption from 1000 watts to 900.
http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/itdojo/?p=987
The more cores you have side by side, the wider the CPU is.
So anyone have any idea when we can buy one?
So if I do the math right, you're saying that 256GB = 100W. So if they shut down the rest of the memory, that would be 800W for CPUs, fans, power and a drive or two?
Wow, that is a power-hungry CPU.
But can it run Crysis?
I took it for the team. Seriously however, is this socket relevant to regular enthusiasts? What is the projected lifespan of 1366?
Well, if it was used as a server, it would have had a lot of hard drives (10+). So I wouldn't say a drive or two.
I'd buy that for a dollar!
As quoted by LowRun......"So, we are one week past AMD's worst case scenario for BD's availability but they don't feel like communicating about the delay, I suppose AMD must be removed from the reliable sources list for AMD's products launch dates"
Actually, most of the power is consumed by the module that is being read/written at a certain time, so by removing some memory from a system you only save the power needed to refresh it, wich is about 10-20 times less than the one needed when active.
800w for CPU's, fans, drive(s), chipsets.. a bit power hungry on the CPU possibly, but not really unexpectedly.
All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.
here is a video that demos the ras capabilities. you can actually see what he is doing in this vid.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bZIWYLttjY
thanks for making me not feel like a noobThanks, I was wondering where the memory was myself...
and thanks blauhung for the info
well, let s be gentlemen ... you do the math on your own processors, and you avoid to mess up the math on mine. Thanks!
Your Timex watch is using less power than YOUR processor, it does not mean Timex CPU is a good server chip. Thanks!
On Xtremesystem, it is about horse power, world grid as fast as you can with awesome efficency ... but 1st, you want to top of the list ...
Last edited by Drwho?; 03-10-2010 at 10:32 PM.
DrWho, The last of the time lords, setting up the Clock.
those board has no overclock option hehe
Intel Core i5 6600K + ASRock Z170 OC Formula + Galax HOF 4000 (8GBx2) + Antec 1200W OC Version
EK SupremeHF + BlackIce GTX360 + Swiftech 655 + XSPC ResTop
Macbook Pro 15" Late 2011 (i7 2760QM + HD 6770M)
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) , Huawei Nexus 6P
[history system]80286 80386 80486 Cyrix K5 Pentium133 Pentium II Duron1G Athlon1G E2180 E3300 E5300 E7200 E8200 E8400 E8500 E8600 Q9550 QX6800 X3-720BE i7-920 i3-530 i5-750 Semp140@x2 955BE X4-B55 Q6600 i5-2500K i7-2600K X4-B60 X6-1055T FX-8120 i7-4790K
Yay, boards are in the wild...
Now to get my hands on one
i5 2500K @ 4.9GHz+ 8GB G-Skill RipJaws DDR3-2000 @1600Mhz CAS 6 Asus P8P67 Pro CrossFire 6970's @ 950/1450
Xeon X5677 @ 4.5Ghz 6GB G-Skill RipJaws DDR3-2000 @1600Mhz CAS 7 Gigabyte EX58-UD5 4870x2
i7-880 @ 4.2Ghz+ (still playing) 4GB G-Skill RipJaws DDR3-2000 @2300Mhz CAS 9 Asus Maximus III Formula MSI Hawk 5770
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks