Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 56

Thread: Pure Power @ 4k Random with 9211

  1. #26
    PCMark V Meister
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Athens GR
    Posts
    771
    device manager shows 2 ssds unallocated and 2 basic disks.. one basic disk is a usb drive (my backup) and the other my bootup device....
    even i use dynamic disk on those 2 SSDs... the performance is no where near 250k IO/s .......
    The raid configuration is set to Raid 0... WITH 6 drives....
    Now if it impassible to belive it and u only belive in PCmarkVantage or only in AS SSD benchmark ok then "NUMA" is the only word that i will say
    Everybody knows that pcmark has a very best friend called Cache its common secret.
    but ok the time will tell. Some ppl have seen the performance through livestreaming so no problem for me for others " No hard feelings im in NDA "

  2. #27
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,820
    I am not skeptical in any way, I am just puzzled and want to know what drives/volumes (RAID volumes) achieved what.
    So we are talking 6 SSDs in RAID0 on the 9211? (I thought 9211 is a pass-through only, so just checking)
    P5E64_Evo/QX9650, 4x X25-E SSD - gimme speed..
    Quote Originally Posted by MR_SmartAss View Post
    Lately there has been a lot of BS(Dave_Graham where are you?)

  3. #28
    PCMark V Meister
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Athens GR
    Posts
    771
    currect.

  4. #29
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    300
    @Tiltevros
    I'm a little lost on your setup as well. Numbers look great, but it's a little confusing.

    @alfaunits
    The 9211 is an HBA, but it does have a controller that handles raid 0 or 1. It might not be the same as a 9260, but I still have the option within the 9211 bios to configure raid 0 or 1. I don't need to do anything within windows.
    MainGamer PC----Intel Core i7 - 6GB Corsair 1600 DDR3 - Foxconn Bloodrage - ATI 6950 Modded - Areca 1880ix-12 - 2 x 120GB G.Skill Phoenix SSD - 2 x 80GB Intel G2 - Lian LI PCA05 - Seasonic M12D 850W PSU
    MovieBox----Intel E8400 - 2x 4GB OCZ 800 DDR2 - Asus P5Q Deluxe - Nvidia GTS 250 - 2x30GB OCZ Vertex - 40GB Intel X25-V - 60GB OCZ Agility- Lian LI PCA05 - Corsair 620W PSU

  5. #30
    PCMark V Meister
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Athens GR
    Posts
    771
    Quote Originally Posted by Spoiler View Post
    @alfaunits
    The 9211 is an HBA, but it does have a controller that handles raid 0 or 1. It might not be the same as a 9260, but I still have the option within the 9211 bios to configure raid 0 or 1. I don't need to do anything within windows.

  6. #31
    PCMark V Meister
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Athens GR
    Posts
    771
    6 ssd on 9211 @ raid0 64k stripe size drivers for windows 2008 R2

  7. #32
    SLC
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    2,795
    You are at the limit of your SSDs. If you had more, it would do more. Each X25-M can do 35k at the 4kb level, so 6*35 is the 210k you are seeing. 8 would be 280k .

  8. #33
    PCMark V Meister
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Athens GR
    Posts
    771
    for some reason i let 2 ssd out of my raid0 just to see something new.
    in HD tune at smart options i get average speed 635MB/s on each intel x25m this is something that we have to discuss screenshots will be posting later

  9. #34
    PCMark V Meister
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Athens GR
    Posts
    771
    the average speed of each SSD is around 265-270 MB/s at least HD tune 4.01 and everest says....

  10. #35
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,820
    Quote Originally Posted by Spoiler View Post
    @alfaunits
    The 9211 is an HBA, but it does have a controller that handles raid 0 or 1. It might not be the same as a 9260, but I still have the option within the 9211 bios to configure raid 0 or 1. I don't need to do anything within windows.
    Ah, cool. All is clear now. Thanks.
    P5E64_Evo/QX9650, 4x X25-E SSD - gimme speed..
    Quote Originally Posted by MR_SmartAss View Post
    Lately there has been a lot of BS(Dave_Graham where are you?)

  11. #36
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Wichita, Ks
    Posts
    3,887
    these results are awesome. soon we shall see the full power of the 9260-8i once they release the new software...MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    this is what i have been talking about when comparing it to the older gen controllers people!
    this goes forward...1231 getting smaller in the rearview mirror people
    Last edited by Computurd; 03-03-2010 at 08:55 PM.
    "Lurking" Since 1977


    Jesus Saves, God Backs-Up
    *I come to the news section to ban people, not read complaints.*-[XC]Gomeler
    Don't believe Squish, his hardware does control him!

  12. #37
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Warrenton, VA
    Posts
    3,029
    yes, 1231 getting smaller but it will be interesting to see how enhanced 92118i and 92608i stack up against the 1880 - whenever that finally arrives.

  13. #38
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2,597
    It's great to see the power of ssd's being unleashed but I'm confused. Is this hardware or software? How can software produce these results and is there a price being paid somewhere?

  14. #39
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,820
    It's 6 X25-Ms on 9211 as "hardware" RAID0. I was puzzled as well. See posts above.
    P5E64_Evo/QX9650, 4x X25-E SSD - gimme speed..
    Quote Originally Posted by MR_SmartAss View Post
    Lately there has been a lot of BS(Dave_Graham where are you?)

  15. #40
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2,597
    Edit: ^ sorry I did not mean hard or soft raid I meant is software delivering the benefits from a hard array? It sounds very much like software applications and as below maybe one drive is being used for cache.

    Tilt, spill the beans


    So the drives not in the array were being used for cache?

    "LSI MegaRAID CacheCade cache tiering software enables SSDs to be configured as a secondary tier of cache to maximize transactional I/O performance."
    Last edited by Ao1; 03-04-2010 at 05:25 AM.

  16. #41
    PCMark V Meister
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Athens GR
    Posts
    771
    Quote Originally Posted by audienceofone View Post
    Edit: ^ sorry I did not mean hard or soft raid I meant is software delivering the benefits from a hard array? It sounds very much like software applications and as below maybe one drive is being used for cache.

    Tilt, spill the beans


    So the drives not in the array were being used for cache?

    "LSI MegaRAID CacheCade cache tiering software enables SSDs to be configured as a secondary tier of cache to maximize transactional I/O performance."
    cachecade works only with mechanicals drives

  17. #42
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2,597
    What do they mean by the statement I quoted then?

    There are two forms of software? FastPath technology & cachecade?

  18. #43
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Wichita, Ks
    Posts
    3,887
    from some reading i have done the cachecade is another level of cache memory created as a sort of "buffer" between a hdd array and the controller. it uses intelligent caching algorithims to use it to effectively boost performance of commonly sought out I/o. it would really only offer performance improvements on hdd arrays.
    I am more interested in fastpath. that is where the speed improvements will come about for ssd arrays.
    Last edited by Computurd; 03-04-2010 at 07:42 AM.
    "Lurking" Since 1977


    Jesus Saves, God Backs-Up
    *I come to the news section to ban people, not read complaints.*-[XC]Gomeler
    Don't believe Squish, his hardware does control him!

  19. #44
    SLC
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    2,795
    Quote Originally Posted by Computurd View Post
    from some reading i have done the cachecade is another level of cache memory created as a sort of "buffer" between a hdd array and the controller. it uses intelligent caching algorithims to use it to effectively boost performance of commonly sought out I/o. it would really only offer performance improvements on hdd arrays.
    I am more interested in fastpath. that is where the speed improvements will come about for ssd arrays.
    Could a software ram drive be used for the cachecade? It should speed things up even for SSDs...

  20. #45
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    2,838
    It sounds like Caschecade is a sort of ASAP. (Auto-tuning SSD Accelerated Pools of storage)

    Much like Adaptec's MaxIQ. Link to tomshardware
    -
    Hardware:

  21. #46
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Wichita, Ks
    Posts
    3,887
    exactly^^
    "Lurking" Since 1977


    Jesus Saves, God Backs-Up
    *I come to the news section to ban people, not read complaints.*-[XC]Gomeler
    Don't believe Squish, his hardware does control him!

  22. #47
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Spokompton, WA
    Posts
    188
    Awesomeness!
    Asus Rampage III Formula
    I7 970 (200x23=4610)
    EK Supreme HF Copper
    Swiftech 420 QP w/ (4) Scythe GT AP-15 (1850 RPM)
    Swiftech 355 w/ ek X-Top v2

    (3) Asus 5850 (1050/1250/1.3v)
    (3) EK 5850 FC
    Swiftech 220 QP w/ (2) Scythe GT AP-15 (1850 RPM)
    Swiftech 355 w/ ek X-Top v2

    Cosair HX850
    (3) 2GB Gskill F3-12800CL7T-6GBPI
    (1) Intel X25-M G2
    (3) WD Black 1TB



  23. #48
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    657
    Quote Originally Posted by Tiltevros View Post
    LSI MegaRAID FastPath optimizer software provides high-performance I/O acceleration for SSDs connected to a 6Gb/s SAS/SATA MegaRAID controller. The technology is designed to dramatically boost transactional application throughput, delivering up to 150,000 I/Os per second (IOPS). The software supports full optimization of SSD and hard disk drive (HDD) virtual disk groups to deliver a 3X improvement in read and write IOPS compared to MegaRAID controllers not utilizing FastPath technology.
    How much do we know about the FastPath software? (I'm sure it is windows only.) Is it something you run and leave in memory (a service) or is it some kind of optimizing software that you run periodically? (Maybe even making TRIM not needed???)

    If I'm reading the info in the press release correctly it sounds like if I buy a 9240 4i then I can attach two X25-M G2, and also my two Raptor HDD's and get "fastpath" benefit for both RAID-0 arrays at this time. So for now I can make the 2x RaptorX into a nice 300Gb Raid-0 that is fast bulk storage that will benefit from the FastPath stuff. Later I might get two more X25-M G2...

    BTW: I'm considering the 9240 4i since it has a PCIe x8 for about the same price as the 9211 4i which only has the PCIe x4. I'm thinking that the 9240 is probably a 9260 without the 512Mb cache memory and with the slower 533Mhz PowerPC chip.

    Another question would be if I could use most of the 2xSSD as a RAID-0 and set aside a partition on those SSD's for the Cache stuff they mentioned. That might be nice also.
    Last edited by keithlm; 03-05-2010 at 11:57 PM.
    FX-8350, Powercolor ATI R9 290X LCS, OCZ Vertex 4, Crosshair V Forumula-Z, AMD Radeon DDR3-2133 2x8Gb, Corsair HX1000W, Thermaltake Xaser VI, Xonar D2X, Water Cooling 140.3

  24. #49
    PCMark V Meister
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Athens GR
    Posts
    771
    9240 is a 9211 with some extra staff its not the 9260 with out cache.
    9260 has RoC cpu for RAID 0,1,5,6 .
    Please wait for the Public Announcement.
    i have already problems with some posts.

  25. #50
    PCMark V Meister
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Athens GR
    Posts
    771
    LSI and Kinston together
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOj7WXCvOzQ
    9260 with 4 kinstons

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •