Results 1 to 25 of 2723

Thread: The GT300/Fermi Thread - Part 2!

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,463
    470 SMSRP = $299, PSU requirement = 550Watt. Meant to compete with 5850, recommend 50 more watts, performance slightly faster than 5870. Looks like a winner.

    http://www.shanebaxtor.com/2010/02/2...u-requirement/
    Bring... bring the amber lamps.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    1,264
    Quote Originally Posted by jaredpace View Post
    470 SMSRP = $299, PSU requirement = 550Watt. Meant to compete with 5850, recommend 50 more watts, performance slightly faster than 5870. Looks like a winner.

    http://www.shanebaxtor.com/2010/02/2...u-requirement/
    I want to play devils advocate and gun down the fact you were somewhat warping words. They said "no doubt NVIDIA will be aiming the performance of the model more around the HD 5870 area though" not that it will compete with the 5870. They are making a blatent ( and retarded ) assumption on their part. It would make no sense to put it at 5850 prices if it can trade blows with the 5870. It would be insanity given the cost involved with this chip. They would turn a very small profit at 300 if any ( possibly even selling at a loss? hell the GTX 260 costed ironically around 260 USD in the first few months and every indication points to GF100 being more expensive to produce; coupled with the late coming to the party, i think it would be retarded to price it at 299 unless it happens to be underwhelming and they have no choice )

    The only remotely logical point of pricing a faster card at a lower price would be to restore customer confidence but I'd think at this point they'd be more concerend with share holder confidence and making up for lost time (delays / technical speed bumps ). Making a profit worth their while launching a near 3 billion transistor gpu ( I assume the 470 isn't a unit disabled 480 unlike previous cards so perhaps its cost won't be so astronomical ) at 299 just doesn't compute... Hell I'd love to be wrong and see the 470 launch at 299 AND match / beat the 5870 but it just sounds too good to be true and too illogical. I also can't ignore the fact that the past has shown when Nvidia has a performance lead, they ask customers to pay for it.
    Last edited by Chickenfeed; 02-22-2010 at 12:01 PM.
    Feedanator 7.0
    CASE:R5|PSU:850G2|CPU:i7 6850K|MB:x99 Ultra|RAM:8x4 2666|GPU:980TI|SSD:BPX256/Evo500|SOUND:2i4/HS8
    LCD:XB271HU|OS:Win10|INPUT:G900/K70 |HS/F:H115i

  3. #3
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    above USA...below USSR
    Posts
    1,186
    480GTX is listed for 699 which puts it in 5890 territory, if this beast performs on par if not greater then colour me green. source' http://www.techpowerup.com/115816/Ge...ts_Listed.html
    Case-Coolermaster Cosmos S
    MoBo- ASUS Crosshair IV
    Graphics Card-XFX R9 280X [out for RMA] using HD5870
    Hard Drive-Kingston 240Gig V300 master Seagate 160Gb slave Seagate 250Gb slave Seagate 500Gb slave Western Digital 500Gb
    CPU-AMD FX-8320 5Ghz
    RAM 8Gig Corshair c8
    Logitech 5.1 Z5500 BOOST22
    300Gb of MUSICA!!


    Steam ID: alphamonkeywoman
    http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/933ab/

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •