MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 3593

Thread: Retail Q9650 Overclocking Thread

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Croatia
    Posts
    23
    I have 1,2875 VID CPU and last night past 4,9 GHz for max CPU-Z,
    bench at ~ 4,8 GHz, all on air (cold air - open window) and vcore around 1,60-1,65 V

    http://hwbot.org/community/submissio...hz_4923.84_mhz

    MBO:EP45-Extreme, CPU:Q9650 @ 4,00 GHz, Cooler: IFX-14 + 2x120 mm, RAM:Transcend aXeRAM PC2-8500 2x2 GB
    HDD:2 x WD 640 AAKS, GPU:XFX HD4890 XXX + Accelero S1 + 1x120mm, PSU:Corsair HX520, MON:Asus VW221D

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    30
    Quote Originally Posted by orbiter View Post
    Normally for very high overclocks it's more benificial if you have a low VID as the chip is actually binned as one that requires less voltage needs for it's stock speeds. When overclocking this assists us by having a larger voltage margin for overclocking. Your 1.225v chip is not a bad chip at all, It's just not one of the very low VID chips which means that overclocking to really high frequencies would more than likely require voltages way beyond Intels safe specs.
    That's what I was thinking

    Quote Originally Posted by thebluemeanie1 View Post
    My Q9650 is a 1.225V VID if I remember correctly and it will do 4.91GHz at around 1.57V. It seems like it would run prime95 at 4.5Ghz and 1.42V but I never bothered to stability test extensively.(I think I did 15 minutes of prime at 4.7GHz 1.52V before the temperatures were in the high 80s. Its been too long since I tried to push it further.)

    Don't be worried about a little bit higher VID.
    Glad to see a 1.225 VID can go that fast

    Quote Originally Posted by Linuxfan View Post
    sean222, with more voltage and the right settings you can get it past 4.25.
    I had a regular Q9650 and with 1.65vcore it did 4.7 and 4.8 on water and maxed out around 4.95ghz on subzero.
    Yea, you're right, but my cooling is not adequate to push 1.6+ volts.

    Quote Originally Posted by In-Fluence View Post
    I concur, mine's a 1.2 which seems to be about the average, but it can go past 5ghz, and bench at ~4.9 on water.


    Quote Originally Posted by E-mil View Post
    I have 1,2875 VID CPU and last night past 4,9 GHz for max CPU-Z,
    bench at ~ 4,8 GHz, all on air (cold air - open window) and vcore around 1,60-1,65 V

    http://hwbot.org/community/submissio...hz_4923.84_mhz

    ZOMG, you guys are getting amazing speeds...so it's not my VID then It's me LoL.

    Actually I think it's my cooling, although I have water cooling, I only have a Feser 240 rad...AND my overclocked GTX 295 is in the loop! It generates a lot of heat that my CPU pays for I have another rad (MCR-220)...maybe I can make another loop.

    Ok ok, so now that I know that it's possible to go faster, would it be safe to run at 1.5v or 1.6v 24/7? (with OK water cooling) I'm enjoying 4.25 @ 1.375, but 4.5 (24/7) was my goal a long time ago! Haven't made it there yet

    Thanks
    Asus Maximus V Gene (0701) • Intel i7 3770K @ 4.8GHz HT(1.31v 24/7) • AMD HD7970 @ 1275MHz (1.36v)
    16GB G.Skill Trident X@ 2400MHz (10-12-12-23) • Sony 55" LED EX620 • Corsair Obsidian 650D • Corsair Gold AX750w
    OCZ Vertex 3 (120GB) [Win 7 Pro SP1] • OCZ Vertex 3 (60GB) [OSX Lion 10.7.2]
    XSPC RS240 -> EK XTC140 -> EK Supreme HT -> EK-FC7970 -> XSPC750 (7v)

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •