Results 1 to 25 of 2036

Thread: The GT300/Fermi Thread

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by neliz View Post
    one is 725, one is 750 (i hope I'm not reading fake fact sheets now btw)
    too high clocks i think...

    Quote Originally Posted by neliz View Post
    It says that GF100 scores P22000 in Vantage.. which.. you already knew for a couple of hours...

    5k above a 5870, which is around 25% faster...



    as fast as 285sli and a 5970... makes sense... i guess...
    but isnt a P score kinda pointless for such a highend card?
    how about X?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sam_oslo View Post
    22k is behind the GTX 295, but can be a good start for a single card with early (and totally new) drivers..
    295 scores more than 22K? where?

    Quote Originally Posted by jazkat View Post
    The GF100 card length is 10.61"
    The GF104 is going to be larger, around 5870 length
    The GF104 is the faster of the two cards.

    At midnight (EST, -5 GMT), I will fill in the blanks.... MUHAHAHAA.

    GF100 outperforms ATi's 5870 by 46% on average
    GF100 outperforms ATi's 5970 by 8% on average

    The GF100 gets 148 fps in DiRT2
    The GF100 gets 73 fps in Crysis2
    The GF100 gets 82 fps in AvP3
    cheers
    so 100=360 and 104=380?
    with this kind of performance... why would anybody want sli or a dual card unless its for benching?

    but those are nvidia pr numbers...
    the real numbers are probably notably lower... theres a reason so many people said ~25% faster than 5870, and i dont think it can beat the 5970 consistently... if it would be 48% faster than a 5870 it would have to score over 25K in vantage, and a card performing better compared to the competition in games than in 3dmark? thats not going to happen... 3dmark has turned into a 3D sisoft sandra benchmark, showing the maximum theoretical performance which is always higher than realworld performance, and the gap between theoretical max and actual max grows with every new card. so a new card that is 30% faster in 3dmark compared to another card, is most likely only 25-29% faster in games.

    Quote Originally Posted by neliz View Post
    Lol@nFinity



    restricted to 1920x1080 displays.
    amazing visual realism and advanced dynamic realism... terrible marketing speak...

    Quote Originally Posted by Jamesrt2004 View Post
    well nvidia's implimentation is a bad way, there is that cimpany at CES which has 3d without the need for glasses and just a 120hz res which is WAYYYY better and worked just as good... thats the way they should do it...
    what tech is that? and have you seen it with your own eyes? i saw all the 3d stuff at the display tradeshow here in taipei over half a year ago, CMO CTM and AUO showed their panel tech back then, which samsung sony lg etc used to build displays they now show at CES... and the 3d tech that didnt require glasses was terrible... it was distorted and flickered and low res, and when you moved your head or even just your eyes slightly, the image changes...
    Last edited by saaya; 01-17-2010 at 02:45 AM.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •