The GT300/Fermi Thread

[saaya]

one is 725, one is 750 (i hope I'm not reading fake fact sheets now btw)

too high clocks i think...

It says that GF100 scores P22000 in Vantage.. which.. you already knew for a couple of hours...

5k above a 5870, which is around 25% faster...



as fast as 285sli and a 5970... makes sense... i guess...
but isnt a P score kinda pointless for such a highend card?
how about X?

22k is behind the GTX 295, but can be a good start for a single card with early (and totally new) drivers..

295 scores more than 22K? where?

The GF100 card length is 10.61"
The GF104 is going to be larger, around 5870 length
The GF104 is the faster of the two cards.

At midnight (EST, -5 GMT), I will fill in the blanks.... MUHAHAHAA.

GF100 outperforms ATi's 5870 by 46% on average
GF100 outperforms ATi's 5970 by 8% on average

The GF100 gets 148 fps in DiRT2
The GF100 gets 73 fps in Crysis2
The GF100 gets 82 fps in AvP3

cheers
so 100=360 and 104=380?
with this kind of performance... why would anybody want sli or a dual card unless its for benching?

but those are nvidia pr numbers...
the real numbers are probably notably lower... theres a reason so many people said ~25% faster than 5870, and i dont think it can beat the 5970 consistently... if it would be 48% faster than a 5870 it would have to score over 25K in vantage, and a card performing better compared to the competition in games than in 3dmark? thats not going to happen... 3dmark has turned into a 3D sisoft sandra benchmark, showing the maximum theoretical performance which is always higher than realworld performance, and the gap between theoretical max and actual max grows with every new card. so a new card that is 30% faster in 3dmark compared to another card, is most likely only 25-29% faster in games.

Lol@nFinity



restricted to 1920x1080 displays.

amazing visual realism and advanced dynamic realism... terrible marketing speak...

well nvidia's implimentation is a bad way, there is that cimpany at CES which has 3d without the need for glasses and just a 120hz res which is WAYYYY better and worked just as good... thats the way they should do it...

what tech is that? and have you seen it with your own eyes? i saw all the 3d stuff at the display tradeshow here in taipei over half a year ago, CMO CTM and AUO showed their panel tech back then, which samsung sony lg etc used to build displays they now show at CES... and the 3d tech that didnt require glasses was terrible... it was distorted and flickered and low res, and when you moved your head or even just your eyes slightly, the image changes...