I thought there would be heatsinks, wouldn't those NF200 chips run hot without it or whatever?
Anyway, the board needs more SATA ports, and I don't like how they are arranged.
I thought there would be heatsinks, wouldn't those NF200 chips run hot without it or whatever?
Anyway, the board needs more SATA ports, and I don't like how they are arranged.
AMD Threadripper 12 core 1920x CPU OC at 4Ghz | ASUS ROG Zenith Extreme X399 motherboard | 32GB G.Skill Trident RGB 3200Mhz DDR4 RAM | Gigabyte 11GB GTX 1080 Ti Aorus Xtreme GPU | SilverStone Strider Platinum 1000W Power Supply | Crucial 1050GB MX300 SSD | 4TB Western Digital HDD | 60" Samsung JU7000 4K UHD TV at 3840x2160
No, if you look at the benching picture, you can see that the NB, SB, and NF200 chips have a low-profile heatsink covering them, much like the large SB heatsink on the P6T7 or RIIE. This board is really meant to be put under water anyways, so I doubt that it will matter.
(By the way, is there any way that this topic could be merged with the other one? It's getting a little confusing trying to follow two active threads.)
Says who? Do you have one? No. Low profile doesn't automatically assume water cool only. Plus, the person I quoted was probably referring to the pics of the board lacking heatsinks.. so don't say no to me sir. The benching picture was not done by EVGA.. it is not a final board.
Last edited by Tobit; 01-07-2010 at 07:02 PM.
Ok, I made a simply reply to your response, no need to get all defensive.
No, I do not own the board, and I know that it is not the final version, but I still think that it will be very difficult to come up with a heatsink design to sufficiently cool the 3 very hot chips without interfering with the PCIe slots. And odds are, if you have $450-$550 to spend on a motherboard, $2000 to spend on CPUs, and at least $400 to spend on RAM (not to mention the large/multiple PSUs, large case, GPUs, etc.), an additional $150 for a full cover watercooling block would be peanuts.
Bookmarks