It is possible to write negative news about NVIDIA and not sound the way Charlie does. Most journalist do it all the time, and you don't see me or anyone else complaining about them. It has everything to do with how things are worded, and Charlie has always managed to sneak in a snide remark about NVIDIA's general competency as a company or their dishonesty where it had no relevance.Originally Posted by flippin_waffles
lol wow, the web is a fickle place. all those that despise Charlie D suddenly approve of him because his article supports their loyalties... in reality, his writing style hasn't changed one iota. the only thing that's changed is the calender and it's getting closer to when nvidia finally has working silicon, so that is what he is reporting. so it turns out it should have been nv those people should have been dispising all along. oh the irony!
given patterns like this, it seems there must be some real inherent social dangers to the internet.
/observation
He editorializes more than he reports news, yet he claims to be a journalist.
Bookmarks