Somehow I find it hard to believe they're going to move to a 28nm process when they're having problems with the 40nm process. I'd surely like to see it, but I'm not holding my breathe.
Somehow I find it hard to believe they're going to move to a 28nm process when they're having problems with the 40nm process. I'd surely like to see it, but I'm not holding my breathe.
Yeah, 28nm would be a joke right now unless someone is hiding something. Whole image looks like a wishful fake thing.
ASUS Sabertooth P67B3· nVidia GTX580 1536MB PhysX · Intel Core i7 2600K 4.5GHz · Corsair TX850W · Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
8GB GSKill Sniper PC3-16000 7-8-7 · OCZ Agility3 SSD 240GB + Intel 320 SSD 160GB + Samsung F3 2TB + WD 640AAKS 640GB · Corsair 650D · DELL U2711 27"
well the time frame looks fishy , but Gf is skipping 32nm and going straight to 28nm. I think this is the same move as they did with the 4770 to test the process.Originally Posted by NaMcO
Phenon II x4 955 (3.7ghz)/athlon II x2 245 (3.7ghz), Mugen 2 , gigabyte 790xt ud4p, 5770 1000/1420 , 4GB ddr3
http://superclock.mysmf.com 5770 1ghz bench
evga failed
QFT!
Adobe is working on Flash Player support for 64-bit platforms as part of our ongoing commitment to the cross-platform compatibility of Flash Player. We expect to provide native support for 64-bit platforms in an upcoming release of Flash Player following the release of Flash Player 10.1.
tmsc wont be able toit up though 28nm = global foundries iirc
"Cast off your fear. Look forward. Never stand still, retreat and you will age. Hesitate and you will die. SHOUT! My name is "
//James
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks